Jixiao Cui

Dr. Jixiao Cui

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

6Years (2021-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
10 January 2024 in Journal of Hazardous Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RBRunhao Bai
Runhao Bai
HLHongjin Liu
Hongjin Liu
JCJixiao Cui
Jixiao Cui
YWYan Wu
Yan Wu
XGXiaoyu Guo
Xiaoyu Guo
WHWenqing He
Wenqing He

15 January 2021 in Agronomy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YZYingxing Zhao
Yingxing Zhao
YCYuanquan Chen
Yuanquan Chen
HDHongcui Dai
Hongcui Dai
JCJixiao Cui
Jixiao Cui
LWLin Wang
Lin Wang
PSPeng Sui
Peng Sui
To address the low productivity of sandy farmlands, our study aimed to conduct a comparative study on the effects of different organic amendment (OA) inputs for the potential improvement of crop yield and soil quality in sandy alkaline farmlands through the selection of a suitable OA. This study set up straw (ST) returning as control and chemical fertilizer (CF) treatment as a side control, and chose three OAs returning as treatments, including pig manure (PM), biogas residue (BR), and straw biochar (BC), for improving soil fertility, with all amendments having matched doses of nitrogen (N). The experiment was conducted at the Wuqiao Experimental Station (37°41 N, 116°37 E) of China Agricultural University in Hebei Province, China, from October 2012 to September 2016. The cropping rotation was the winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)-summer maize (Zea mays L.) rotation system. Through a consecutive four-year field experiment, the principal results showed that three types of OA application significantly increased soil organic carbon from 1.46 g kg−1 to 8.24 g kg−1, soil total N from 0.21 g kg−1 to 0.64 g kg−1, soil available potassium from 55.85 mg kg−1 to 288.76 mg kg−1, and soil available phosphate from 4.86 mg kg−1 to 65.00 mg kg−1 in the 0–20 cm soil layer. The BR was the most effective in improving soil nutrients as compared with the ST. The PM and BR treatments were more conducive to promoting crop yield by 6–20% than ST, and the BC treatment significantly reduced the yield of winter wheat by 19% and summer maize by 8%. As the BR and PM treatments improved the soil nutrient content and significantly increased crop yield, these were the top choices for transforming the low-yield sandy farmlands.

12 November 2022 in Journal of Cleaner Production
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YZYushi Zhang
Yushi Zhang
JCJixiao Cui
Jixiao Cui
XLXueqing Liu
Xueqing Liu
Hongrun LiuHongrun Liu
Hongrun Liu
YLYanan Liu
Yanan Liu
MZMingcai Zhang
Mingcai Zhang

16 July 2023 in Journal of Hazardous Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RBRunhao Bai
Runhao Bai
RFRuiqi Fan
Ruiqi Fan
CXChanghong Xie
Changhong Xie
QLQin Liu
Qin Liu
QLQi Liu
Qi Liu
WHWenqing He
Wenqing He

9 February 2024 in Journal of Cleaner Production
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YXYinan Xu
Yinan Xu
JLJinna Li
Jinna Li
HLHao Li
Hao Li
SYShuqi Yang
Shuqi Yang
QJQingxiu Jiang
Qingxiu Jiang
YCYuanquan Chen
Yuanquan Chen

9 April 2022 in Agriculture
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Jianing WeiJianing Wei
Jianing Wei
JCJixiao Cui
Jixiao Cui
YXYinan Xu
Yinan Xu
JLJinna Li
Jinna Li
XLXinyu Lei
Xinyu Lei
YCYuanquan Chen
Yuanquan Chen
The agricultural sustainable development for human well-being considers food security and ecological health as well as people’s socio-economic conditions. Nowadays, most of the holistic assessments of agricultural sustainability, mainly focus on food production and ecological consequences, relatively lacking analysis from the socio-economic perspective. In this context, this study constructs an agricultural social life cycle assessment model based on the guidelines of UNEP to assess the social and economic impacts on the three major staple grain crops in China, including maize, rice and wheat. The assessment model aims to analyze effects of stakeholders containing farmer, agricultural value chain actors, consumer, rural areas, society, and impact categories including high-quality growth of agriculture, a comfortable life in rural areas, the prosperity of rural people. The data is mainly from national statistical databases and representative industry databases. The impact assessment adopts social risk and social impact as quantitative characterization methods, and Analytical Hierarchical Process to obtain weights. The results show that: among the three major grain crops, farmers are the most important factors for stakeholders, and agricultural industrial development has the greatest potential negative impacts on society; maize has the most positive impacts on agricultural sustainable development in China.