Background/Objectives: Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a severe complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) resulting from histocompatibility differences between donor and host cells leading to inflammation, tissue damage, and compromised patient outcome. Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is considered as a second-line treatment administered to patients with GVHD who do not respond to corticosteroid treatment or who experience a relapse after an initial response and are therefore classified as steroid refractory (SR). The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical response rates in both pediatric and adult patients with acute (a) or chronic (c) GVHD and to assess the effectiveness of ECP using the real-world data from a single center. Methods: We performed a retrospective study on 30 patients, including 11 pediatric and 19 adult patients who were treated with ECP as a second-, third-, or fourth-line therapy for (a) and (c) GVHD, alongside corticosteroids and other immunomodulatory medications. The median time from aGVHD onset to ECP was 11.5 days (range: 3 days–9 months), while for cGVHD, the median time was 90 days (range: 2 days–9 months). Results: The overall response rate (ORR) in the aGVHD patient population was 60% with a median of 9 procedures (range: 2–20). For cGVHD patients, the ORR was 70% after a median of 23.5 ECP procedures (range: 8–43). Most patients had skin involvement, with ECP achieving an ORR of 81.8% in aGVHD and 77.7% in cGVHD cases. Conclusions: ECP is a beneficial therapy for patients with (a) and (c) GVHD who have not responded to corticosteroids and other forms of immunosuppressive therapy. Specifically, ECP demonstrated efficacy in improving skin and oral symptoms and permitted reductions in or the elimination of their corticosteroid usage. The study found that extending the duration of ECP treatment was associated with better outcomes, and no detectable complications were observed over a 38-week period.

Background: Thrombosis in light chain amyloidosis (LCA) occurs in the context of multiple organ dysfunction and inflammation. Conventional coagulation tests (screening) may not sufficiently capture the procoagulant substrate in the inflammatory/therapeutic dynamics. Methods: A total of 61 consecutive patients with LCA were prospectively included in the study. Clinical data, including organ involvement, time of diagnosis, treatment phase, DOAC exposure and thrombosis history were systematically recorded and subjected to screening. Specialized hemostasis tests such as APTT/PT, fibrinogen, D-dimer, TEG and TGT were performed and conventional times were analyzed in the subgroup without DOAC. Results: The prevalence of documented thrombosis was 32.8%, and thrombosis status was associated with TEG positivity and more strongly with TGT positivity. Hypercoagulability was identified in 50.8% by TEG and 41.0% by TGT, regardless of whether APTT/PT were within the reference values. APTT/PT did not predict thrombosis recurrence (p > 0.05), which was predicted by TEG (p = 0.0027) and TGT (p = 0.0006). An inflammation/fibrin turnover panel (CRP, fibrinogen, D-dimer) predicted TEG positivity (p < 0.0001), but not TGT, and was correlated with assessment at diagnosis, daratumumab-based therapy, and cardiac involvement. Conclusions: Global tests (TEG/TGT) promptly correlate with thrombosis recurrence in our cohort and provide crucial information in addition to clotting times for thrombotic phenotyping. Inflammation can influence TEG, so the decision to recommend the tests and the timing of their performance should be adapted to the clinical, biological, and therapeutic context.