Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) and diagnostic stewardship programs (DSPs) are essential strategies for effectively managing infectious diseases and tackling antimicrobial resistance (AMR). These programs can have a complementary impact, i.e., ASPs optimize antimicrobial use to prevent resistance, while DSPs enhance diagnostic accuracy to guide appropriate treatments. This review explores the current landscape of ASPs and DSPs in pediatric care, focusing on key factors, influencing their development, implementation, and evaluation across various settings. A multidisciplinary approach is necessary, involving multiple healthcare professionals to support comprehensive stewardship practices in pediatric care. No single intervention suits all settings, or even the same setting, in different countries; interventions must be tailored to each specific context, considering factors such as hospital capacity, patient complexity, and the parent–child dynamic. It is essential to educate caregivers on optimal antibiotic use through clear, concise messages adapted to their socioeconomic status and level of understanding. The cost-effectiveness of ASPs and DSPs should also be assessed, and standardized metrics should be employed to evaluate success in pediatric settings, focusing on outcomes beyond just antibiotic consumption, such as AMR rates. This manuscript further discusses emerging opportunities and challenges in ASP implementation, offering insights into future research priorities. These include large-scale studies to evaluate the long-term impact of ASPs, cost-effectiveness assessments of pediatric-specific diagnostic tools, and the integration of artificial intelligence to support clinical decision making. Addressing these areas will enhance the effectiveness and sustainability of ASPs, contributing to global efforts to combat AMR and improve pediatric health outcomes.

The containment measures following COVID-19 pandemic drastically reduced airway infections, but they also limited the access of patients to healthcare services. We aimed to assess the antibiotic prescription patterns in the Italian paediatric primary care setting before and after the containment measures implementation. For this retrospective analysis, we used a population database, Pedianet, collecting data of patients aged 0–14 years enrolled with family paediatricians (FP) from March 2019 to March 2021. Antibiotic prescriptions were classified according to WHO AWaRe classification. An interrupted time series evaluating the impact of the containment measures implementation on the monthly antibiotic index, on the access to watch index, and on the amoxicillin to co-amoxiclav index stratified by diagnosis was performed. Overall, 121,304 antibiotic prescriptions were retrieved from 134 FP, for a total of 162,260 children. From March 2020, the antibiotic index dropped by more than 80% for respiratory infections. The Access to Watch trend did not change after the containment measures, reflecting the propensity to prescribe more broad-spectrum antibiotics for respiratory infections even during the pandemic. Similarly, co-amoxiclav was prescribed more often than amoxicillin alone for all the diagnoses, with a significant variation in the trend slope for upper respiratory tract infections prescriptions.

Background: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative Staphylococci (MR-CoNS), and vancomycin-resistant Enterococci (VRE) are increasing worldwide and represent a threat for the limited treatment options in pediatric patients and neonates compared to adults. Recommendations in pediatrics are mainly extrapolated from adults’ studies. Methods: A literature search for the treatment of these pathogens in children (<18 years old) was conducted in Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library. Studies reporting data on single-patient-level outcomes related to a specific antibiotic treatment for multidrug resistant (MDR) Gram-positive bacterial infection in children were included. Studies reporting data from adults and children were included if single-pediatric-level information could be identified (PROSPERO registration: CRD42022383867). Results: The search identified 11,740 studies (since January 2000), of which 48 fulfilled both the inclusion and the exclusion criteria and were included in the analysis: 29 for MRSA, 20 for VRE, and seven for MR-CoNS. Most studies were retrospective studies. Vancomycin was mainly used as a comparator, while linezolid and daptomycin were the most studied antimicrobials showing good efficacy. Conclusions: Linezolid showed a safety and efficacy profile in a neonatal setting; daptomycin is increasingly used for MRSA, but the evidence is scarce for VRE.

Cytomegalovirus causes the most common congenital infection worldwide. With most infants asymptomatic at birth, the few affected may present with variable clinical scenarios, from isolated hearing loss to severe neurologic impairment. Public health interventions include all actions at the health system, community, and individual levels that aim at reducing the burden of congenital Cytomegalovirus. This review examines the literature on maternal and neonatal screening programs in light of current evidence for treatment and the development of vaccines against Cytomegalovirus. Potential biases and benefits of these interventions are outlined, with the objective of increasing awareness about the problem and providing readers with data and critical tools to participate in this ongoing debate.

(1) Background: Infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) or extensively drug-resistant (XDR) bacteria represent a challenge in the neonatal population due to disease severity and limited therapeutic possibilities compared to adults. The spread of antimicrobial resistance and drug availability differ significantly worldwide. The incidence of MDR bacteria has constantly risen, causing an increase in morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs in both high-income (HIC) and low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). Therefore, more evidence is needed to define the possible use of newer molecules and to optimize combination regimens for the oldest antimicrobials in neonates. This systematic review aims to identify and critically appraise the current antimicrobial treatment options and the relative outcomes for MDR and XDR Gram-negative bacterial infections in the neonatal population. (2) Methods: A literature search for the treatment of MDR Gram-negative bacterial infections in neonates (term and preterm) was conducted in Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library. Studies reporting data on single-patient-level outcomes related to a specific antibiotic treatment for MDR Gram-negative bacterial infection in children were included. Studies reporting data from adults and children were included if single-neonate-level information could be identified. We focused our research on four MDROs: Enterobacterales producing extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) or carbapenemase (CRE), Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii. PROSPERO registration: CRD42022346739 (3) Results: The search identified 11,740 studies (since January 2000), of which 22 fulfilled both the inclusion and exclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. Twenty of these studies were conducted in LMIC. Colistin is the main studied and used molecule to treat Gram-negative MDR bacteria for neonate patients in the last two decades, especially in LMIC, with variable evidence of efficacy. Carbapenems are still the leading antibiotics for ESBL Enterobacterales, while newer molecules (i.e., beta-lactam agents/beta-lactamase inhibitor combination) are promising across all analyzed categories, but data are few and limited to HICs. (4) Conclusions: Data about the treatment of Gram-negative MDR bacteria in the neonatal population are heterogeneous and limited mainly to older antimicrobials. Newer drugs are promising but not affordable yet for many LMICs. Therefore, strategies cannot be generalized but will differ according to the country’s epidemiology and resources. More extensive studies are needed to include new antimicrobials and optimize the combination strategies for the older ones.

Guidelines about febrile neutropenia in paediatric patients are not homogeneous; the best empiric treatment of this condition should be driven by local epidemiology. The Weighted-Incidence Syndromic Combination Antibiogram (WISCA) addresses the need for disease-specific local susceptibility evidence that could guide empiric antibiotic prescriptions based on outcome estimates of treatment regimens obtained as a weighted average of pathogen susceptibilities. This study developed a WISCA model to inform empirical antibiotic regimen selection for febrile neutropenia (FN) episodes in onco-haematological paediatric patients treated at two Italian paediatric tertiary centres. We included blood cultures from patients with a bloodstream infection and neutropenia admitted to the Paediatric Haematology-Oncology wards in Padua and Genoa Hospitals from 2016 to 2021. WISCAs were developed by estimating the coverage of 20 antibiotics as monotherapy and of 21 combined regimens with a Bayesian probability distribution. We collected 350 blood cultures, including 196 g-negative and 154 g-positive bacteria. Considering the most used antibiotic combinations, such as piperacillin–tazobactam plus amikacin, the median coverage for the pool of bacteria collected in the study was 78%. When adding a glycopeptide, the median coverage increased to 89%, while the replacement of piperacillin–tazobactam with meropenem did not provide benefits. The developed WISCAs showed that no monotherapy offered an adequate coverage rate for the identified pathogens. The application of WISCA offers the possibility of maximizing the clinical utility of microbiological surveillance data derived from large hospitals to inform the choice of the best empiric treatment while contributing to spare broad-spectrum antibiotics.