Jeffery R. Wickens

Dr. Jeffery R. Wickens

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

39Years (1988-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2001 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JRJohn N. J. Reynolds
John N. J. Reynolds
BHBrian I. Hyland
Brian I. Hyland
JWJeffery R. Wickens
Jeffery R. Wickens

1 June 2002 in Neural Networks
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JRJohn N.J Reynolds
John N.J Reynolds
JWJeffery R. Wickens
Jeffery R. Wickens

29 June 2005 in Journal of Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WPWei-Xing Pan
Wei-Xing Pan
RSRobert Schmidt
Robert Schmidt
JWJeffery R. Wickens
Jeffery R. Wickens
BHBrian I. Hyland
Brian I. Hyland
Behavioral conditioning of cue-reward pairing results in a shift of midbrain dopamine (DA) cell activity from responding to the reward to responding to the predictive cue. However, the precise time course and mechanism underlying this shift remain unclear. Here, we report a combined single-unit recording and temporal difference (TD) modeling approach to this question. The data from recordings in conscious rats showed that DA cells retain responses to predicted reward after responses to conditioned cues have developed, at least early in training. This contrasts with previous TD models that predict a gradual stepwise shift in latency with responses to rewards lost before responses develop to the conditioned cue. By exploring the TD parameter space, we demonstrate that the persistent reward responses of DA cells during conditioning are only accurately replicated by a TD model with long-lasting eligibility traces (nonzero values for the parameter λ) and low learning rate (α). These physiological constraints for TD parameters suggest that eligibility traces and low per-trial rates of plastic modification may be essential features of neural circuits for reward learning in the brain. Such properties enable rapid but stable initiation of learning when the number of stimulus-reward pairings is limited, conferring significant adaptive advantages in real-world environments.

1 December 2009 in Neuropharmacology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GTGail Tripp
Gail Tripp
JWJeffery R. Wickens
Jeffery R. Wickens

1 September 2002 in Journal of Neurophysiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MTMark J. Tunstall
Mark J. Tunstall
DODorothy Oorschot
Dorothy Oorschot
AKAnnabel Kean
Annabel Kean
JWJeffery R. Wickens
Jeffery R. Wickens
The spiny projection neurons are by far the most numerous type of striatal neuron. In addition to being the principal projection neurons of the striatum, the spiny projection neurons also have an extensive network of local axon collaterals by which they make synaptic connections with other striatal projection neurons. However, up to now there has been no direct physiological evidence for functional inhibitory interactions between spiny projection neurons. Here we present new evidence that striatal projection neurons are interconnected by functional inhibitory synapses. To examine the physiological properties of unitary inhibitory postsynaptic potentials (IPSPs), dual intracellular recordings were made from pairs of spiny projection neurons in brain slices of adult rat striatum. Synaptic interactions were found in 9 of 45 pairs of neurons using averages of 200 traces that were triggered by a single presynaptic action potential. In all cases, synaptic interactions were unidirectional, and no bidirectional interactions were detected. Unitary IPSPs evoked by a single presynaptic action potential had a peak amplitude ranging from 157 to 319 μV in different connections (mean: 277 ± 46 μV, n = 9). The percentage of failures of single action potentials to evoke a unitary IPSP was estimated and ranged from 9 to 63% (mean: 38 ± 14%, n = 9). Unitary IPSPs were reversibly blocked by bicuculline ( n = 4) and had a reversal potential of −62.4 ± 0.7 mV ( n = 5), consistent with GABA-mediated inhibition. The findings of the present study correlate very well with anatomical evidence for local synaptic connectivity between spiny projection neurons and suggest that lateral inhibition plays a significant role in the information processing operations of the striatum.

1 January 2001 in Journal of Neurophysiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JKJ.N.D. Kerr
J.N.D. Kerr
JWJeffery R. Wickens
Jeffery R. Wickens
Dopamine and glutamate are key neurotransmitters involved in learning and memory mechanisms of the brain. These two neurotransmitter systems converge on nerve cells in the neostriatum. Dopamine modulation of activity-dependent plasticity at glutamatergic corticostriatal synapses has been proposed as a cellular mechanism for learning in the neostriatum. The present research investigated the role of specific subtypes of dopamine receptors in long-term potentiation (LTP) in the corticostriatal pathway, using intracellular recording from striatal neurons in a corticostriatal slice preparation. In agreement with previous reports, LTP could be induced reliably under Mg2+-free conditions. This Mg2+-free LTP was blocked by dopamine depletion and by the dopamine D-1/D-5 receptor antagonist SCH 23390 but was not blocked by the dopamine D-2 receptor antagonist remoxipride or the GABAAantagonist picrotoxin. In dopamine-depleted slices, the ability to induce LTP could be restored by bath application of the dopamine D-1/D-5 receptor agonist, SKF 38393. These results show that activation of dopamine D-1/D-5 receptors by either endogenous dopamine or exogenous dopamine agonists is a requirement for the induction of LTP in the corticostriatal pathway. These findings have significance for current understanding of learning and memory mechanisms of the neostriatum and for theoretical understanding of the mechanism of action of drugs used in the treatment of psychotic illnesses and Parkinson's disease.