Risk stratification in acute myocarditis is based on the clinical signs of heart failure, the degree of cardiac dysfunction, and the findings in cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). The aim of the current study is to examine the prognostic yield of the natriuretic peptide N-terminal-pro hormone Brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) and C-reactive protein (CRP) in acute myocarditis among patients with preserved/mildly reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). We retrospectively analyzed 59 patients (median age 28 years, 76% males) with ICD-9 discharge diagnosis of acute myocarditis. Basic characteristics, echocardiographic, and laboratory parameters were obtained from computerized files. The median length of stay was 3, (IQR 2–5) days, and the median LVEF was 48% (IQR, 54–62%). High levels of NT-proBNP and CRP were associated with increased length of stay (r = 0.57, p < 0.001; r = 0.4 p = 0.001, respectively), while troponin level was not (r = 0.068, p = 0.61). During the index hospitalization, complications occurred in 14 (23.7%) patients. High NT-proBNP and CRP levels were associated with complications (p < 0.001, and p = 0.001, respectively), while troponin level was not (p = 0.452). In conclusion, routine measurement of NT-proBNP and CRP are preferred over troponin for risk stratification in hemodynamically stable myocarditis.

The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with several cardiovascular manifestations including myocardial injury, myocarditis, arrhythmia, and pulmonary embolism. Rare cases of stress-induced cardiomyopathy, or takotsubo syndrome have also been reported during the acute infection, and secondary to stress following lockdown and self-isolation. Diagnosis in the setting of the acute infection is challenging since conventional imaging modalities such as transthoracic echocardiography and coronary angiography should be restricted to minimize physician-patient contact until the patients is tested negative for COVID-19. The use of point of care hand-held ultrasound is appropriate for this purpose. The overall course of the disease seems to be similar to takotsubo in the general population. Physicians should be familiar with the clinical presentation, possible complications, and management of takotsubo during COVID-19 outbreak. Here, we review the special considerations in the diagnosis and management of takotsubo syndrome during the current pandemic.

Introduction: Sodium-glucose cotransporter- 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have become a cornerstone in heart failure (HF), Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and cardiovascular disease (CVD) management. In the current retrospective study, we aimed to assess efficacy and safety of SGLT2 inhibitors early following acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Methods: Patients with T2DM hospitalized for AMI in 2017-2020 were divided according to SGLT2 inhibitors therapy status on discharge (with vs without therapy). Primary outcome was defined as a composite of hospitalizations for HF, recurrent AMI, and cerebrovascular accident (CVA). Secondary outcomes included hospitalizations for any cause, total cumulative number of hospitalizations, and all-cause mortality. Results: A total of 69 patients (mean age 59.2 ± 8.2 years) with AMI discharged with SGLT2 inhibitors were compared to 253 patients (mean age 62.5 ± 9.8) with no SGLT2 inhibitors. During the first year post-AMI, 4 (5.8%) patients in the treatment group and 16 (6.3%) in the control group were hospitalized for CV events (p = 1.0). Patients in the SGLT2 inhibitors group had lower rates of hospitalization for any cause (31.9% vs 47.8%, P = 0.02), with no change in mortality (0% vs 3.6%, P = 0.21). After multivariate regression analysis, only female gender was associated with increased risk for readmission, mainly due to urinary tract infections. No events of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) or limb amputation were reported. Conclusions: We found that early initiation of SGLT2 inhibitors in T2DM patients following AMI is safe and decreases the risk of hospitalization for any cause.

Moady G, et al. Int J Heart Fail. 2024 Jan;6(1):28-33. https://doi.org/10.36628/ijhf.2023.0033

Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, originally used for diabetes mellitus, are gaining more popularity for other indications, owing to their positive cardiovascular and renal effects. SGLT2 inhibitors reduce heart failure (HF) hospitalization and improve cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. Later, SGLT2 inhibitors were evaluated in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFREF) and had beneficial effects independent of the presence of diabetes. Recently, reductions in cardiovascular outcomes were also observed in patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFPEF). SGLT2 inhibitors also reduced renal outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease. Overall, these drugs have an excellent safety profile with a negligible risk of genitourinary tract infections and ketoacidosis. In this review, we discuss the current data on SGLT2 inhibitors in special populations, including patients with acute myocardial infarction, acute HF, right ventricular (RV) failure, left ventricular assist device (LVAD), and type 1 diabetes. We also discuss the potential mechanisms behind the cardiovascular benefits of these medications.

Aims: Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are used increasingly for patients with heart failure or chronic kidney disease to improve cardiac and renal outcomes. The use of these medications in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) is still limited and lacks evidence regarding the safety profile. In this study, we aimed to report our experience in treating 20 patients, supported by LVAD, with SGLT2 inhibitors. Methods: We studied the safety profile of SGLT2 inhibitors (dapagliflozin and empagliflozin) in 20 patients (mean age 64.7 ± 12.2 years, 75% male) supported by LVAD as destination therapy. All patients have diabetes mellitus and were prescribed SGLT2 inhibitors for glycemic control. Results: SGLT2 inhibitors were well tolerated with no major adverse events. Few suction events were reported in three patients without the need for pump speed adjustment. There was no change in mean arterial pressure (71.1 ± 5.6 vs. 70.1 ± 4.8 mmHg, P = 0.063). Modest decline in renal function was observed in six patients within the first weeks after drug initiation. There were no events of diabetic ketoacidosis or limb amputation. Conclusion: SGLT2 inhibitors are safe in patients with LVAD and may potentially improve cardiovascular and renal outcomes in this special population.