Le Yang

Dr. Le Yang


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
17 February 2023 in ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
YLYipeng Liu
Yipeng Liu
QYQi Yang
Qi Yang
YXYiling Xu
Yiling Xu
LYLe Yang
Le Yang
Full-reference (FR) point cloud quality assessment (PCQA) has achieved impressive progress in recent years. However, in many cases, obtaining the reference point clouds is difficult, so no-reference (NR) metrics have become a research hotspot. Few researches about NR-PCQA are carried out due to the lack of a large-scale PCQA dataset. In this article, we first build a large-scale PCQA dataset named LS-PCQA, which includes 104 reference point clouds and more than 22,000 distorted samples. In the dataset, each reference point cloud is augmented with 31 types of impairments (e.g., Gaussian noise, contrast distortion, local missing, and compression loss) at 7 distortion levels. Besides, each distorted point cloud is assigned with a pseudo-quality score as its substitute of Mean Opinion Score. Inspired by the hierarchical perception system and considering the intrinsic attributes of point clouds, we propose a NR metric ResSCNN based on sparse convolutional neural network (CNN) to accurately estimate the subjective quality of point clouds. We conduct several experiments to evaluate the performance of the proposed NR metric. The results demonstrate that ResSCNN exhibits the state-of-the-art performance among all the existing NR-PCQA metrics and even outperforms some FR metrics. The dataset presented in this work will be made publicly accessible at https://smt.sjtu.edu.cn . The source code for the proposed ResSCNN can be found at https://github.com/lyp22/ResSCNN .

1 April 2007 in Neural Networks
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YXYanbo Xue
Yanbo Xue
LYLe Yang
Le Yang
SHSimon Haykin
Simon Haykin

22 September 2009 in IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LYLe Yang
Le Yang
KHK. C. Ho
K. C. Ho
This paper considers the problem of time difference-of-arrival (TDOA) source localization when the TDOA measurements from multiple disjoint sources are subject to the same sensor position displacements from the available sensor positions. This is a challenging problem and closed-form solution with good localization accuracy has yet to be found. This paper proposes an estimator that can achieve this purpose. The proposed algorithm jointly estimates the unknown source and sensor positions to take the advantage that the TDOAs from different sources have the same sensor position displacements. The joint estimation is a highly nonlinear problem due to the coupling of source and sensor positions in the measurement equations. We introduce the novel idea of hypothesized source locations in the algorithm development to enable the formulation of psuedolinear equations, thereby leading to the establishment of closed-form solution for source location estimates. Besides the advantage of closed-form, the newly developed algorithm is shown analytically, under the condition that the TDOA measurement noise and the sensor position errors are sufficiently small, to reach the CRLB accuracy. For clarity, the localization of two disjoint sources is used in the algorithm development. The developed algorithm is then examined under the special case of a single source and extended to the more general case of more than two unknown sources. The theoretical developments are supported by simulations.

29 August 2008 in IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KHK. C. Ho
K. C. Ho
LYLe Yang
Le Yang
Sensor position uncertainty is known to degrade significantly the source localization accuracy. This paper investigates the use of a single calibration emitter, whose position is known to the sensor array, to reduce the loss in localization accuracy due to sensor position errors that are random. Using a Gaussian noise model, we first derive the Cramer-Rao lower bound (CRLB) for a time difference of arrival (TDOA)-based source location estimate with the use of a calibration source. The differential calibration technique that is commonly used in Global Positioning System through the use of a calibration source to mitigate the inaccuracy in satellite ephemeris data is analyzed. The analysis indicates that differential calibration in most cases cannot reach the CRLB accuracy. The paper then proceeds to propose an algebraic closed-form solution for the source location estimate using both TDOA measurements from the unknown and the calibration source. The proposed algorithm is shown analytically, under high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and small sensor position noise, or under moderate level of SNR and sensor position noise together with distant unknown and calibration sources, to reach the CRLB accuracy. Simulations are used to corroborate and support the theoretical development.

31 July 2009 in IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LYLe Yang
Le Yang
KHK. C. Ho
K. C. Ho
A previous study shows that the use of a calibration emitter whose position is known exactly can significantly reduce the loss in time differences of arrival (TDOA) based source localization accuracy when the available sensor positions have random errors. This paper extends the previous work to a more practical scenario where the exact position of a calibration emitter is not known. By modeling the calibration position error as additive Gaussian noise, the amount of reduction in localization accuracy due to calibration position error is derived through Cramer-Rao lower bound (CRLB) analysis. In addition, the analysis also affirms the previous studies on Bayesian sensor network localization that it remains possible to improve the localization accuracy even if the calibration position is completely unknown. Next, a performance analysis illustrates that the penalty could be very high if one simply pretends the calibration position is accurate and ignores its error. A closed-form solution is then developed by accounting for the calibration position error and it is proved analytically to reach the CRLB accuracy when the sensor and calibration position errors are small relative to the distance between the calibration emitter and the sensor. Finally, the results are generalized to the case where multiple calibration emitters are available. When deploying multiple calibration emitters, although their positions may not be known exactly, we show that it is possible to completely eliminate the sensor position error and recover the best localization accuracy that is limited by the measurement noise in TDOAs only. All the theoretical developments are corroborated by simulations.

1 January 2016 in Digital Signal Processing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JLJinzhou Li
Jinzhou Li
LYLe Yang
Le Yang
FGFucheng Guo
Fucheng Guo
WJWenli Jiang
Wenli Jiang