Purpose: To evaluate the discrepancy between the diagnostic wax-up and the resulting direct veneers using different matrices. Materials and method: A total of 48 identical misaligned models, 12 wax-up models and one ‘every other tooth’ wax-up model were 3D printed. Group 1: Transparent silicone matrices with holes for the injection of the flowable composite. Group 2: The same procedure as group 1, but the first three teeth were restored using the matrix constructed from the ‘every other tooth’ wax-up model. Group 3: Transparent silicone matrices cut for each tooth and preheated resin composite. Group 4: The same procedure as group 3, but the loaded matrix was placed first in the clear plastic tray, which was used for the matrix’s fabrication. Group 5: Wax-up models (control group). Scans from the veneers were superimposed with the scans from the wax-up and compared using the Patient Monitoring software. Measurements were made at the incisal, middle and cervical third. Kruskal-Wallis test and Dunn post-hoc test (p < 0.05) were used to analyze the results. Results: No statistically significant differences were found between groups 1 and 2 and the control. Group 3 was different from the control in the incisal and middle third, and group 4 was different in the cervical third. Conclusions: (1) Use of one or two matrices and the injection of flowable composite were accurate techniques. (2) Use of a matrix for each tooth combined with a pre-heated composite was the most inaccurate technique, but the use of the clear tray in combination with the matrix improved the accuracy.

The continuous need for simplified, minimally invasive restorative procedures with a high precision has led to the advancement of highly filled flowable resin-based materials. These materials present excellent initial outcomes in various clinical applications, including the injection molding technique. Given that several clinical reports present signs of wear and staining, this systematic review aims to investigate the mechanical and optical properties of highly filled flowable composite resins. A comprehensive literature research was conducted to identify relevant studies from the PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases. Data extraction and screening was performed by two independent evaluators. Both in vitro studies and clinical trials were included. A total of thirty-one studies were included in this review. A total of 27 in vitro studies investigated highly filled flowable composite resins independently, or in comparison with conventional composite resins, traditional flowable composites, bulk-fill flowable composites, glass ionomer cements, and compomers. Additionally, four randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) compared highly filled flowable composite resins with their conventional counterparts. Highly filled flowable composite resins exhibit adequate optical properties. Despite their significant improvements, their mechanical properties remain inferior to those of medium-viscosity composite resins. These materials demonstrate a favorable initial performance in the injection molding technique. Based on a limited number of RCTs, these materials demonstrate an adequate performance in class I and II restorations; however these findings should be interpreted with caution. The reported drawbacks in laboratory studies may contraindicate their clinical application in extensive cavities, load-bearing areas, and in cases of excessive tooth wear and parafunctional activity. A careful clinical case selection is strongly recommended.

(1) Background: Cementation of glass fiber posts to root canals has been associated with various failures, especially debonding. This narrative review aims to present the contemporary concepts concerning the adhesive cementation of glass fiber post and to discuss the optimal management of these factors. (2) Methods: Electronic search was performed in MEDLINE/Pub Med and Google Scholar using selected keywords examining the parameters post length, surface treatment of glass fiber posts, post space preparation and dentin pretreatment, resin cement selection, adhesive systems and hybrid layer formation, and clinical techniques. (3) Results: The search led to the selection of 44 articles. Epoxy resin-based endodontic sealers are recommended and the use of temporary cement in the root canal should be avoided. The minimum length of a glass fiber post adhesively cemented to a root canal is 5 mm. Irrigating the root canals with chlorhexidine, MTAD, or EDTA (alone or in combination with NaOCl) after post space preparation seems to enhance the bond strength. Silane application on the surface of the post seems to be beneficial. Concerning resin cements and adhesive systems, the results were rather inconclusive. Finally, resin cement should be applied inside the root canal with an elongation tip and photoactivation should be delayed. (4) Conclusions: Contemporary concepts of adhesive cementation of glass fiber posts can indeed improve the bond between glass fiber posts, resin cement, and root canal dentin, however, evidence coming from long-term randomized prospective clinical trials is needed in order to obtain safer conclusions.