There is enormous global anticipation for stem cell-based therapies that are safe and effective. Numerous pre-clinical studies present encouraging results on the therapeutic potential of different cell types including tissue derived stem cells. Emerging evidences in different fields of research suggest several cell types are safe, whereas their therapeutic application and effectiveness remain challenged. Multiple factors that influence treatment outcomes are proposed including immunocompatibility and potency, owing to variations in tissue origin, ex-vivo methodologies for preparation and handling of the cells. This communication gives an overview of literature data on the different types of cells that are potentially promising for regenerative therapy. As a case in point, the recent trends in research and development of the mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) for cell therapy are considered in detail. MSCs can be isolated from a variety of tissues and organs in the human body including bone marrow, adipose, synovium, and perinatal tissues. However, MSC products from the different tissue sources exhibit unique or varied levels of regenerative abilities. The review finally focuses on adipose tissue-derived MSCs (ASCs), with the unique properties such as easier accessibility and abundance, excellent proliferation and differentiation capacities, low immunogenicity, immunomodulatory and many other trophic properties. The suitability and application of the ASCs, and strategies to improve the innate regenerative capacities of stem cells in general are highlighted among others.

Hair loss, or alopecia, is associated with several psychosocial and medical comorbidities, and it remains an economic burden to individuals and the society. Alopecia is attributable to varied mechanisms and features a multifactorial predisposition, and the available conventional medical interventions have several limitations. Thus, several therapeutic strategies for alopecia in regenerative medicine are currently being explored, with increasing evidence suggesting that mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) implantation, MSC-derived secretome treatment, and blood-derived platelet-rich plasma therapies are potential treatment options. In this review, we searched the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, and Scopus using various combinations of terms, such as “stem cell,” “alopecia,” “hair loss,” “Androgenetic alopecia,” “male-pattern hair loss,” “female-pattern hair loss,” “regenerative hair growth,” “cell therapy,” “mesenchymal stem cells,” “MSC-derived extracellular vesicles,” “MSC-derived exosomes,” and “platelet-rich plasma” and summarized the most promising regenerative treatments for alopecia. Moreover, further opportunities of improving efficacy and innovative strategies for promoting clinical application were discussed.

Current trends indicate a growing interest among healthcare specialists and the public in the use of regenerative medicine-based approaches for skin regeneration. The approaches are categorised in either cell-based or cell-free therapies and are reportedly safe and effective. Cell-based therapies include mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), tissue induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), fibroblast-based products, and blood-derived therapies, such as those employing platelet-rich plasma (PRP) products. Cell-free therapies primarily involve the use of MSC-derived extracellular vesicles/exosomes. MSCs are isolated from various tissues, such as fat, bone marrow, umbilical cord, menstrual blood, and foetal skin, and expanded ex vivo before transplantation. In cell-free therapies, MSC exosomes, MSC-derived cultured media, and MSC-derived extracellular vesicles are collected from MSC-conditioned media or supernatant. In this review, a literature search of the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, and Scopus was conducted using several combinations of terms, such as ‘stem’, ‘cell’, ‘aging’, ‘wrinkles’, ‘nasolabial folds’, ‘therapy’, ‘mesenchymal stem cells’, and ‘skin’, to identify relevant articles providing a comprehensive update on the different regenerative medicine-based therapies and their application to skin regeneration. In addition, the regulatory perspectives on the clinical application of some of these therapies in Japan are highlighted.

Chronic wounds represent a significant global burden, afflicting millions with debilitating complications. Despite standard care, impaired healing persists due to factors like persistent inflammation and impaired tissue regeneration. Mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs) offer an innovative regenerative medicine approach, delivering stem cell-derived therapeutic cargo in engineered nanoscale delivery systems. This review examines pioneering bioengineering strategies to engineer MSC-EVs into precision nanotherapeutics for chronic wounds. Emerging technologies like CRISPR gene editing, microfluidic manufacturing, and biomimetic delivery systems are highlighted for their potential to enhance MSC-EV targeting, optimize therapeutic cargo enrichment, and ensure consistent clinical-grade production. However, key hurdles remain, including batch variability, rigorous safety assessment for potential tumorigenicity, immunogenicity, and biodistribution profiling. Crucially, collaborative frameworks harmonizing regulatory science with bioengineering and patient advocacy hold the key to expediting global clinical translation. By overcoming these challenges, engineered MSC-EVs could catalyze a new era of off-the-shelf regenerative therapies, restoring hope and healing for millions afflicted by non-healing wounds.

Mesenchymal stromal cell-derived extracellular vesicles (MSC-EVs) have emerged as promising cell-free therapeutics that recapitulate key paracrine functions of MSCs whilst mitigating limitations of viable-cell therapies. Clinical translation is hindered by inconsistent dose metrics, lack of validated potency assays, and manufacturing complexities. Here we review advances in MSC-EV standardisation, source and culture determinants, engineering and delivery platforms, and clinical applications, exemplified by chronic wound healing. We operationalise dual-metric dosing (particles plus protein) linked to mechanism-aligned potency assays, adopt a route-aware exposure–response framework to guide delivery strategies, and propose decision matrices aligning MSC sources and bioprocesses with indication-specific tasks. Good Laboratory Practice safety panels and Good Manufacturing Practice scale-up strategies are outlined to support regulatory readiness. Early clinical studies demonstrate feasibility and short-term safety but reveal heterogeneous efficacy, underscoring the need for harmonised dosing and potency measures. Collectively, these insights provide a roadmap to advance MSC-EVs as indication-matched regenerative medicines.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a highly prevalent, chronic, and progressive autoimmune disorder primarily affecting joints and muscles. The associated inflammation, pain, and motor restriction negatively impact patient quality of life (QOL) and can even contribute to premature mortality. Further, conventional treatments such as antiinflammatory drugs are only symptomatic. Substantial progress has been made on elucidating the etiopathology of overt RA, in particular the contributions of innate and adaptive immune system dysfunction to chronic inflammation. Although the precise mechanisms underlying onset and progression remain elusive, the discovery of new drug targets, early diagnosis, and new targeted treatments have greatly improved the prognosis and QOL of patients with RA. However, a sizable proportion of patients develop severe adverse effects, exhibit poor responses, or cannot tolerate long-term use of these drugs, necessitating more effective and safer therapeutic alternatives. Mounting preclinical and clinical evidence suggests that the transplantation of multipotent adult stem cells such as mesenchymal stromal/stem cells is a safe and effective treatment strategy for controlling chronic inflammation and promoting tissue regeneration in patients with intractable diseases, including RA. This review describes the current status of MSC-based therapies for RA as well as the opportunities and challenges to broader clinical application.