Juan José Ciampi-Dopazo

Dr. Juan José Ciampi-Dopazo

Interventional Radiology, Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital, Grenade, Spain

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2018 in Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JCJuan José Ciampi-Dopazo
Juan José Ciampi-Dopazo
JRJuan María Romeu-Prieto
Juan María Romeu-Prieto
MSMarcelino Sánchez-Casado
Marcelino Sánchez-Casado
BRBeatriz Romerosa
Beatriz Romerosa
ACAlfonso Canabal-Berlanga
Alfonso Canabal-Berlanga
CLCarlos Lanciego
Carlos Lanciego

20 August 2023 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MGMiguel Angel De Gregorio
Miguel Angel De Gregorio
MYMasao Yamamoto-Ramos
Masao Yamamoto-Ramos
AFArturo Fredes
Arturo Fredes
CSCarolina Serrano-Casorran
Carolina Serrano-Casorran
SSSergio Sierre
Sergio Sierre
JGJose Andres Guirola
Jose Andres Guirola
Level of Evidence: Level 2. Purpose: To compare the safety and efficacy of vascular plug (VP) and vascular plug and polidocanol foam (VPPF) treatments for embolization in pelvic congestion syndrome (PCS). Materials and methods: A comparative, prospective, two-center study enrolled 50 women with PCS from January 2019 to January 2020. The patients were divided into two groups, and embolization was performed with VP (n = 25) and VPPF (n = 25) treatments. The mean age of the patients was 45.6 years ± 6.9. Three clinical parameters were assessed: abdominal pain, dyspareunia, and lower limb pain. The primary outcome (clinical success at 1 yr using a VAS), number of devices, procedure and fluoroscopy times, radiation doses, costs, and complications were compared. The participants were followed-up at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Results: At the 1-year follow-up, clinical success did not significantly differ between the two groups (VP vs. VPPF) regarding the improvement of the symptoms analyzed (pelvic pain, dyspareunia, lower extremity pain, and other symptoms (p < 0.05)). The mean number of devices per case was 4 ± 1.1 for the VP group and 2 ± 0.31 for the VPPF group (p < 0.001). No major complications were recorded in either group. The VPPF group had a significantly longer fluoroscopy time (42.8 min ± 14.2 vs. 25.4 min ± 7) and longer radiation dose (VPPF air kerma 839.4 ± 513 vs. VP air kerma 658.4 mGy ± 355 (all p < 0.001)). Conclusions: Embolization for PCS resulted in pain relief in 90% of patients; the use of polidocanol did not demonstrate changes in the clinical outcome. The use of a VP alone was associated with decreased fluoroscopy time and radiation dose.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MGMiguel Angel De Gregorio
Miguel Angel De Gregorio
RBRoman Bernal
Roman Bernal
JCJuan José Ciampi-Dopazo
Juan José Ciampi-Dopazo
JUJose Urbano
Jose Urbano
AMAlfonso Millera
Alfonso Millera
JGJose Andres Guirola
Jose Andres Guirola
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new, bare platinum, detachable microcoil as a metallic embolization agent in the treatment of hemorrhoidal disease. Material and Methods: This prospective single-center study evaluated a new, bare platinum, electrical, detachable microcoil (Prestige plus coil (Balt Montmorency France)) for use in vascular embolization in patients with hemorrhoidal disease. Between January 2020 and January 2021, 24 embolization procedures were performed in 21 patients (12 males, 9 females; mean age 44.3 ± 7.3). The inclusion criteria were: (a) participants with grade I, II and III hemorrhoidal disease on the Goligher classification; (b) patients older than 18 years of age with a score of greater than 4 on the French bleeding score (FBS) scale; (c) patients with scores greater than 2 on the scale of discomfort proposed by Tradi and Farfallah. (d) patients who underwent treatment that included the use of the new novel coil (Prestige plus coil (Balt)) as an embolic material. The exclusion criteria were participants who failed to provide informed consent and participants diagnosed with rectal bleeding due to other causes (cancer, fissures or others). Participants with severe renal insufficiency, non-correctable coagulation abnormalities and adverse reactions to the contrast medium not correctable with medication were also excluded. The symptoms, technical aspects, the transarterial approach, clinical and technical success complications and short-term outcomes were assessed. Results: Technical success was obtained in 100% of the cases. Seventeen (80.9%) patients experienced improvements in their hemorrhoidal disease. The VAS and QL scores improved by 4 and 1.5 points (81.2% and 87.5%), respectively, after embolization (pV: 0001). Three (14.2%) patients underwent a second embolization due to rebleeding. One patient (4.7%) underwent surgery. No major complications were observed. Three patients had minor complications. The assessment of subjective post-treatment symptoms and QL surveys showed significant differences from the baseline survey. Likewise, the measurement of the degree of satisfaction using a telephone survey at 12 months revealed a high degree of patient satisfaction over 10 points (mean 8.3 ± 1.1). Conclusions: The present study demonstrates that the use of the new, platinum, detachable, electrical microcoil is safe and well-tolerated in the treatment of hemorrhoidal disease. Key points: Catheter-directed hemorrhoidal dearterialization (CDHD) is the procedure of embolization with embolic agents for the treatment of internal hemorrhoids. CDHD is a simple and safe procedure that is accepted by patients and preserves the anal sphincter; it presents few complications when metal devices or microspheres are used as embolic agents. As the recommended embolization agent in treatments, the Prestige electrical, detachable coil is a safe, easy-to-use and effective arterial embolic device.

24 December 2021 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MGMiguel Angel De Gregorio
Miguel Angel De Gregorio
JGJose Andres Guirola
Jose Andres Guirola
SSSergio Sierre
Sergio Sierre
JUJose Urbano
Jose Urbano
JCJuan José Ciampi-Dopazo
Juan José Ciampi-Dopazo
DJDavid Jiménez
David Jiménez
Objectives: to present an interventional radiology standard of practice on the use of inferior vena cava filters (IVCFs) in patients with or at risk to develop venous thromboembolism (VTE) from the Iberoamerican Interventional Society (SIDI) and Spanish Vascular and Interventional Radiology Society (SERVEI). Methods: a group of twenty-two interventional radiologist experts, from the SIDI and SERVEI societies, attended online meetings to develop a current clinical practice guideline on the proper indication for the placement and retrieval of IVCFs. A broad review was undertaken to determine the participation of interventional radiologists in the current guidelines and a consensus on inferior vena cava filters. Twenty-two experts from both societies worked on a common draft and received a questionnaire where they had to assess, for IVCF placement, the absolute, relative, and prophylactic indications. The experts voted on the different indications and reasoned their decision. Results: a total of two-hundred-thirty-three articles were reviewed. Interventional radiologists participated in the development of just two of the eight guidelines. The threshold for inclusion was 100% agreement. Three absolute and four relative indications for the IVCF placement were identified. No indications for the prophylactic filter placement reached the threshold. Conclusion: interventional radiologists are highly involved in the management of IVCFs but have limited participation in the development of multidisciplinary clinical practice guidelines.

30 June 2020 in Intervencionismo
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JCJuan José Ciampi-Dopazo
Juan José Ciampi-Dopazo
APA Puentes-Gutierrez
A Puentes-Gutierrez
MMMa Marquina-Valero
Ma Marquina-Valero
MSM Sanchez-Casado
M Sanchez-Casado
CLC Lanciego-Pérez
C Lanciego-Pérez

30 September 2020 in Intervencionismo
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PPP Pardo-Moreno
P Pardo-Moreno
GRG Ruiz-Villaverde
G Ruiz-Villaverde
JCJuan José Ciampi-Dopazo
Juan José Ciampi-Dopazo
PNP Navarro-Vergara
P Navarro-Vergara
In the following technical note, after appropriately selecting three patients with intermediate-stage hepatocarcinoma (HCC), who are candidates for transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), we describe and show details of the TACE procedure performed with a novel reflux-control microcatheter (Sequre ® , Guerbet). Through a typical endovascular approach and angiographical imaging, lesions were identified and then treated supra-selectively with the microcatheter, whose particularity is to limit the reflux of particles to non-target areas.