Study Design.: Retrospective study. Objective.: We identified radiological risk factors for neurological deficits in mid and low lumbar spinal fractures. Summary of Background Data.: Although numerous studies have focused on radiological risk factors for neurological deficits in spinal cord injury or thoracolumbar junction area fractures, few have examined mid and low lumbar fractures at the cauda equina level. Methods.: We retrospectively reviewed 71 consecutive patients who suffered acute traumatic mid and low lumbar fractures (L2–L5) corresponding to the cauda equina level, as confirmed on magnetic resonance imaging. We defined a neurological deficit as present if the patient had any sensory or motor deficit in the lower extremity or autonomic system at the initial assessment. Various computed tomography parameters of canal stenosis, vertebral body compression, sagittal alignment, interpedicular distance, and presence of vertical laminar fractures were analyzed as independent risk factors to predict neurological deficits using multivariate logistic regression analyses. Results.: At the initial assessment, 31 patients had neurological deficits. Fracture level, AO fracture type, canal encroachment ratio, vertebral compression ratio, interpedicular distance ratio, and presence of a vertical laminar fracture were significantly associated with the presence of neurological deficits (all P < 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression identified fracture level, canal encroachment ratio (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.072, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.018–1.129), and vertebral compression ratio (aOR 0.884, 95% CI 0.788–0.992) as independent predictors of a neurological deficit. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses revealed that only the canal encroachment ratio had good discriminatory ability (area under the curve 0.874, 95% CI 0.791–0.957), and the optimal cutoff was 47% (canal diameter 6.6 mm) with 90.3% sensitivity and 80% specificity. Conclusion.: The canal encroachment ratio was most strongly associated with neurological deficits in traumatic mid and low lumbar fractures, with an optimal cutoff of 47%. Level of Evidence: 4

(1) Background: Cervical foraminal stenosis (CFS) is a common cause of axial neck and arm pain. The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between the severity of CFS and clinical symptoms in terms of severity and sidedness. (2) Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 75 consecutive patients with degenerative CFS. We graded 900 foramina from C3–4 to T1–2 using Park’s grading system. We collected visual analogue scale (VAS) and neck disability index (NDI) values from the neck and both arms. We analyzed the relationships with CFS grades and total number. We defined four types of left/right dominance of CFS (none, left-dominant, right-dominant, and both) by comparing left and right sides using total counts and maximal grade of CFS, respectively. We compared arm pain sidedness (no arm pain, left-only, right only, and bilateral) among different left and right CFS dominance types. (3) Results: Mean neck and left and right arm VAS scores were 4.4 ± 2.5, 4.9 ± 1.6, and 4.6 ± 2.0, respectively. The mean total NDI was 16.0 ± 8.0. The CFS grade at C3–4 and total count were correlated with neck VAS. Arm VAS was also correlated with CFS grade and total counts. Total NDI score was not correlated with radiological parameters. The presence and sidedness of arm pain were significantly different between left and right CFS dominance groups divided by total count of grade 2 and 3 CFS. (4) Conclusions: The CFS grade and total count were correlated with neck and arm VAS. Arm pain occurred more frequently on the side with more grade 2 and 3 CFS.

(1) Background: Being underweight is a known risk factor for hip fractures. However, it is unclear whether the cumulative underweight burden affects the incidence of hip fractures. Therefore, we explored the effect of the cumulative underweight burden on the development of hip fractures; (2) Methods: In a cohort of adults aged 40 years and older, 561,779 participants who were not underweight and had no hip fractures from 2007 to 2009 were identified. The risk of hip fracture from the time of the last examination to December 2018 according to the cumulative burden of being underweight (based on 0 to 3 examinations) was prospectively analyzed; (3) Results: During follow-up (mean 8.3 ± 0.8 years), the prevalence of newly diagnosed hip fractures was 0.2%, 0.4%, 0.5%, and 0.9% among those with 0, 1, 2, and 3 cumulative underweight, respectively. The adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of groups meeting the diagnostic criteria for underweight 1, 2, and 3 compared to 0 were 2.3 (1.6–3.3), 2.9 (1.8–4.5), and 4.5 (3.4–6.1), respectively (p for trend < 0.01); (4) Conclusions: The risk of hip fracture increased as the burden of underweight accumulated.

Wound complications are commonly seen after surgeries for metastatic spine tumors. While numerous studies have pinpointed various risk factors, there is ongoing debate. Therefore, this study aimed to verify various factors that are still under debate utilizing the comprehensive Korean National Health Insurance Service database. We identified and retrospectively reviewed a cohort of 3001 patients who underwent one of five surgical treatments (corpectomy, decompression and instrumentation, instrumentation only, decompression only, and vertebroplasty) for newly diagnosed spinal metastasis between 2009 and 2017. A Cox regression analysis was performed to determine the risk factors. A total of 197 cases (6.6%) of wound revision were found. Only the surgical method and Charlson comorbidity index were significantly different between the group that underwent wound revision and the group that did not. Regarding surgical methods, the adjusted hazard ratios for decompression only, corpectomy, instrumentation and decompression, and instrumentation only were 1.3, 2.2, 2.2, and 2.4, with these ratios being compared to the vertebroplasty group (p for trend = 0.02). In this regard, based on a sizable South Korean cohort, both surgical methods and medical comorbidity were found to be associated with the wound revision rate among spinal surgery patients for spinal metastasis.