Julia Taylor

Dr. Julia Taylor


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2012 in Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FSFrederick S. Vom Saal
Frederick S. Vom Saal
SNSusan C. Nagel
Susan C. Nagel
BCBenjamin L. Coe
Benjamin L. Coe
BABrittany M. Angle
Brittany M. Angle
JTJulia Taylor
Julia Taylor


1 April 2011 in Environmental Health Perspectives
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JTJulia Taylor
Julia Taylor
FSFrederick S. Vom Saal
Frederick S. Vom Saal
WWWade V. Welshons
Wade V. Welshons
BDBertram Drury
Bertram Drury
GRGeorge Rottinghaus
George Rottinghaus
CVCatherine A. VandeVoort
Catherine A. VandeVoort
A peer-reviewed open access journal published by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

22 October 2014 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AHAnnette M. Hormann
Annette M. Hormann
FSFrederick S. Vom Saal
Frederick S. Vom Saal
SNSusan C. Nagel
Susan C. Nagel
RSRichard W. Stahlhut
Richard W. Stahlhut
CMCarol L. Moyer
Carol L. Moyer
JTJulia Taylor
Julia Taylor
Bisphenol A (BPA) is an endocrine disrupting environmental contaminant used in a wide variety of products, and BPA metabolites are found in almost everyone’s urine, suggesting widespread exposure from multiple sources. Regulatory agencies estimate that virtually all BPA exposure is from food and beverage packaging. However, free BPA is applied to the outer layer of thermal receipt paper present in very high (∼20 mg BPA/g paper) quantities as a print developer. Not taken into account when considering thermal paper as a source of BPA exposure is that some commonly used hand sanitizers, as well as other skin care products, contain mixtures of dermal penetration enhancing chemicals that can increase by up to 100 fold the dermal absorption of lipophilic compounds such as BPA. We found that when men and women held thermal receipt paper immediately after using a hand sanitizer with penetration enhancing chemicals, significant free BPA was transferred to their hands and then to French fries that were eaten, and the combination of dermal and oral BPA absorption led to a rapid and dramatic average maximum increase (Cmax) in unconjugated (bioactive) BPA of ∼7 ng/mL in serum and ∼20 µg total BPA/g creatinine in urine within 90 min. The default method used by regulatory agencies to test for hazards posed by chemicals is intra-gastric gavage. For BPA this approach results in less than 1% of the administered dose being bioavailable in blood. It also ignores dermal absorption as well as sublingual absorption in the mouth that both bypass first-pass liver metabolism. The elevated levels of BPA that we observed due to holding thermal paper after using a product containing dermal penetration enhancing chemicals have been related to an increased risk for a wide range of developmental abnormalities as well as diseases in adults.


12 April 2016 in Environmental Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RGRoy R. Gerona
Roy R. Gerona
JPJanet Pan
Janet Pan
AZAmi R. Zota
Ami R. Zota
JSJackie M. Schwartz
Jackie M. Schwartz
MFMatthew Friesen
Matthew Friesen
TWTracey J. Woodruff
Tracey J. Woodruff
Bisphenol A (BPA) is a ubiquitous, endocrine-disrupting environmental contaminant that increases risk of some adverse developmental effects. Thus, it is important to characterize BPA levels, metabolic fate and sources of exposure in pregnant women. We used an improved liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analytic method to directly and simultaneously measure unconjugated BPA (uBPA), BPA glucuronide and BPA sulfate in the urine of a population of ethnically and racially diverse, and predominately low-income pregnant women (n = 112) in their second trimester. We also administered a questionnaire on dietary and non-dietary sources of exposure to BPA. We found universal and high exposure to uBPA and its metabolites: median concentrations were 0.25, 4.67, and 0.31 μg/g creatinine for uBPA, BPA glucuronide, and BPA sulfate, respectively. The median Total BPA (uBPA + BPA in glucuronide and sulfate forms) level was more than twice that measured in U.S. pregnant women in NHANES 2005–2006, while 30 % of the women had Total BPA levels above the 95th percentile. On average, Total BPA consisted of 71 % BPA in glucuronide form, 15 % BPA in sulfate form and 14 % uBPA, however the proportion of BPA in sulfate form increased and the proportion of uBPA decreased with Total BPA levels. Occupational and non-occupational contact with paper receipts was positively associated with BPA in conjugated (glucuronidated + sulfated) form after adjustment for demographic characteristics. Recent consumption of foods and beverages likely to be contaminated with BPA was infrequent among participants and we did not observe any positive associations with BPA analyte levels. The high levels of BPA analytes found in our study population may be attributable to the low-income status of the majority of participants and/or our direct analytic method, which yields a more complete evaluation of BPA exposure. We observed near-universal exposure to BPA among pregnant women, as well as substantial variability in BPA metabolic clearance, raising additional concerns for effects on fetal development. Our results are consistent with studies showing thermal paper receipts to be an important source of exposure, point to the difficulty pregnant women have avoiding BPA exposure on an individual level, and therefore underscore the need for changes in BPA regulation and commerce.