GeneXpert MTB/RIF (Xpert) and Genotype MTBDRplus (DRplus) are two World Health Organization (WHO) endorsed probe based molecular drug susceptibility testing (DST) methods for rapid diagnosis of drug resistant tuberculosis. Both methods target the same 81 bp Rifampicin Resistance Determining Region (RRDR) of bacterial RNA polymerase β subunit (rpoB) for detection of Rifampicin (RIF) resistance associated mutations using DNA probes. So there is a correspondence of the probes of each other and expected similarity of probe binding. We analyzed 92 sputum specimens by Xpert, DRplus and LJ proportion method (LJ-DST). We compared molecular DSTs with gold standard LJ-DST. We wanted to see the agreement level of two molecular methods for detection of RIF resistance associated mutations. The 81bp RRDR region of rpoB gene of discrepant cases between the two molecular methods was sequenced by Sanger sequencing. The agreement of Xpert and DRplus with LJ-DST for detection of RIF susceptibility was found to be 93.5% and 92.4%, respectively. We also found 92.4% overall agreement of two molecular methods for the detection of RIF susceptibility. A total of 84 out of 92 samples (91.3%) had agreement on the molecular locus of RRDR mutation by DRplus and Xpert. Sanger sequencing of 81bp RRDR revealed that Xpert probes detected seven of eight discrepant cases correctly and DRplus was erroneous in all the eight cases. Although the overall concordance with LJ-DST was similar for both Xpert and DRplus assay, Xpert demonstrated more accuracy in the detection of RIF susceptibility for discrepant isolates compared with DRplus. This observation would be helpful for the improvement of probe based detection of drug resistance associated mutations especially rpoB mutation in M. tuberculosis.

Background: Rifampicin resistance (RR) is a key indicator of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) and 95% of the RR is associated with the mutation in the 81-bp rifampicin resistance determining region (RRDR) of the rpoB gene of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC). The Xpert MTB/RIF (Xpert) assay uses five overlapping molecular beacon probes (A-E) complementary to RRDR region that detect MTBC and mutations associated with RR. The objective of the study was to investigate the distribution and frequency of mutations detected by Xpert assay among Beijing and non-Beijing RR-TB isolates. Methods: A total of 205 randomly selected RR-TB specimens detected by Xpert assay were included in this study. A portion of specimens was further subjected to culture, MTBDRplus test and the positive culture isolates were genotyped by spoligotyping. Results: We found that the most frequent mutation occurred at probe E (S531L) binding region in both Beijing and non-Beijing isolates (61.9% and 66.9%, respectively). The Beijing family had higher mutation rates than non-Beijing (19.0% vs 12.4%) at probe B (D516V) while the non-Beijing family had higher mutations at probe D (H526D or H526Y) than the Beijing (13.2% vs 10.7%) family. Mutations at probes Aand C were less common in both Beijing and non-Beijing isolates. There was no significant difference (P=0.36) in the occurrence of mutations at different probes between Beijing and non-Beijing isolates. Conclusions: The study results revealed that the most frequent mutation occurs in the region of probe E and the least common mutations at probe A and C among both Beijing and non-Beijing RR-TB cases. This first insight into the probe mutation variation and frequencies among the RR-TB cases in Bangladesh forms the baseline information for further investigation.

Although phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (DST) is endorsed as the standard for second-line drug testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, it is slow and laborious. We evaluated the accuracy of two faster, easier methodologies that provide results for multiple drugs: a genotypic TaqMan(®) Array Card (TAC) and the Sensititre(®) MYCOTB(TM) plate. Both methods were tested at three central laboratories in Bangladesh, Tanzania, and Thailand with 212 multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) isolates and compared with the laboratories' phenotypic method in use. The overall accuracy for ethambutol, streptomycin, amikacin, kanamycin, ofloxacin, and moxifloxacin vs. the phenotypic standard was 87% for TAC (range 70-99) and 88% for the MYCOTB plate (range 76-98). To adjudicate discordances, we re-defined the standard as the consensus of the three methods, against which the TAC and MYCOTB plate yielded 94-95% accuracy, while the phenotypic result yielded 93%. Some isolates with genotypic mutations and high minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) were phenotypically susceptible, and some isolates without mutations and low MIC were phenotypically resistant, questioning the phenotypic standard. In our view, the TAC, the MYCOTB plate, and the conventional phenotypic method have similar performance for second-line drugs; however, the former methods offer speed, throughput, and quantitative DST information.

Pyrazinamide (PZA) is a frontline antituberculosis (anti-TB) drug used in both first- and second-line treatment regimens. However, due to complex laboratory requirements, the PZA susceptibility test is rarely performed, leading to a scarcity of data on susceptibility to PZA. Bangladesh is a country with a burden of high rates of both TB and multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB), but to our knowledge, published data on rates of PZA susceptibility (PZA ^s ), especially among MDR-TB patients, are limited. We aimed to analyze the PZA susceptibility patterns of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from MDR-TB patients and to correlate the pncA mutation with PZA resistance in Bangladesh. A total of 169 confirmed MDR M. tuberculosis isolates from a pool of specimens collected in a nationwide surveillance study were included in this analysis. All the isolates were tested for phenotypic PZA susceptibility in Bactec mycobacterial growth indicator tube (MGIT) culture medium, and the pncA gene was sequenced. We also correlated different types of clinical information and treatment outcomes with PZA susceptibility. We found that 45% of isolates were phenotypically PZA resistant. Sequencing of the pncA gene revealed a high concordance (82.2%) between the pncA gene sequence and the phenotypic assay results. A total of 64 different mutations were found, and 9 isolates harbored multiple mutations. We detected 27 new pncA mutations. We did not find any significant correlation between the different clinical categories, the genetic lineage, or treatment outcome group and PZA susceptibility. Considering the turnaround time, sequencing would be the more feasible option to determine PZA susceptibility, and further studies to investigate the MIC of PZA should be conducted to determine an effective dose of the drug.

BACKGROUND: The Xpert^® MTB/RIF assay detects Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) and rifampicin (RIF) resistance. RIF-resistant (RIF-R) MTB cases detected using Xpert on sputum specimens at three private-sector TB screening centres in Dhaka, Bangladesh, were subjected to consecutive confirmatory Xpert testing, the results of which were MTB-positive/RIF-susceptible, MTB-positive/RIF-indeterminate or MTB-negative. OBJECTIVE: To assess the possible causes of discordant MTB and RIF-R results. METHODS: Discordant confirmatory Xpert test results were subjected to further investigations using the GenoType^® MTBDRplus assay, culture and rpoB gene sequencing. RESULTS: The confirmatory Xpert test was performed on a remnant or a second specimen collected from individuals with an initial RIF-R result (n = 69); 22 (32%) results were discordant, 20 of which had an ‘MTB detected—very low' result. Further investigations were mostly concordant with the confirmatory Xpert test. Average variability in paired cycle threshold (C_t) values were higher in ‘MTB detected—very low' results vs. specimens with low, medium or high detected MTB results (P < 0.05); discordant results were mostly observed in specimens with ‘MTB detected—very low' (20/22). CONCLUSIONS: Repeating the Xpert test and comparing with other available tests should be considered in case of ‘MTB detected—very low, RIF resistance detected' results on Xpert.