David Oliver

Prof. David Oliver

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

25Years (2002-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 2015 in European Journal of Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DODavid Oliver
David Oliver
GBG. D. Borasio
G. D. Borasio
ACA. Caraceni
A. Caraceni
MVM. de Visser
M. de Visser
WGW. Grisold
W. Grisold
RVR. Voltz
R. Voltz

19 May 2023 in Nature Reviews Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MOMayowa O. Owolabi
Mayowa O. Owolabi
MLMatilde Leonardi
Matilde Leonardi
CBClaudio Bassetti
Claudio Bassetti
JJJoke Jaarsma
Joke Jaarsma
THTadeusz Hawrot
Tadeusz Hawrot
FSFranco Servadei
Franco Servadei

16 June 2010 in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DODavid Oliver
David Oliver
MTMartin R. Turner
Martin R. Turner
Those with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)/motor neuron disease (MND) currently face inevitable progression of their disease, with increasing immobility and variable problems with communication...

1 August 2016 in Journal of the Neurological Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SASamar Aoun
Samar Aoun
LBLauren J. Breen
Lauren J. Breen
RERobert Edis
Robert Edis
RHRobert David Henderson
Robert David Henderson
DODavid Oliver
David Oliver
CBCarol Birks
Carol Birks

14 July 2017 in BMC Palliative Care
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SFSiobhan Fox
Siobhan Fox
CFCiara Fitzgerald
Ciara Fitzgerald
KDKaren Harrison Harrison Dening
Karen Harrison Harrison Dening
KIKate Irving
Kate Irving
George KernohanGeorge Kernohan
George Kernohan
STSuzanne Timmons
Suzanne Timmons
Dementia is the most common neurological disorder worldwide and is a life-limiting condition, but very often is not recognised as such. People with dementia, and their carers, have been shown to have palliative care needs equal in extent to those of cancer patients. However, many people with advanced dementia are not routinely being assessed to determine their palliative care needs, and it is not clear why this is so. An interdisciplinary workshop on “Palliative Care in Neurodegeneration, with a focus on Dementia”, was held in Cork, Ireland, in May 2016. The key aim of this workshop was to discuss the evidence base for palliative care for people with dementia, to identify ‘gaps’ for clinical research, and to make recommendations for interdisciplinary research practice. To lead the discussion throughout the day a multidisciplinary panel of expert speakers were brought together, including both researchers and clinicians from across Ireland and the UK. Targeted invitations were sent to attendees ensuring all key stakeholders were present to contribute to discussions. In total, 49 experts representing 17 different academic and practice settings, attended. Key topics for discussion were pre-selected based on previously identified research priorities (e.g. James Lind Alliance) and stakeholder input. Key discussion topics included: i. Advance Care Planning for people with Dementia; ii. Personhood in End-of-life Dementia care; iii. Topics in the care of advanced dementia at home. These topics were used as a starting point, and the ethos of the workshop was that the attendees could stimulate discussion and debate in any relevant area, not just the key topics, summarised under iv. Other priorities. The care experienced by people with dementia and their families has the potential to be improved; palliative care frameworks may have much to offer in this endeavour. However, a solid evidence base is required to translate palliative care into practice in the context of dementia. This paper presents suggested research priorities as a starting point to build this evidence base. An interdisciplinary approach to research and priority setting is essential to develop actionable knowledge in this area.

24 March 2016 in BMC Palliative Care
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ITI. Tuffrey-Wijne
I. Tuffrey-Wijne
MWMonika T. Wicki
Monika T. Wicki
PHP. Heslop
P. Heslop
MMM. McCarron
M. McCarron
STUART PHILIP TODDSTUART PHILIP TODD
STUART PHILIP TODD
LCL. Curfs
L. Curfs
Empirical knowledge around palliative care provision and needs of people with intellectual disabilities is extremely limited, as is the availability of research resources, including expertise and funding. This paper describes a consultation process that sought to develop an agenda for research priorities for palliative care of people with intellectual disabilities in Europe. A two-day workshop was convened, attended by 16 academics and clinicians in the field of palliative care and intellectual disability from six European countries. The first day consisted of round-table presentations and discussions about the current state of the art, research challenges and knowledge gaps. The second day was focused on developing consensus research priorities with 12 of the workshop participants using nominal group technique, a structured method which involved generating a list of research priorities and ranking them in order of importance. A total of 40 research priorities were proposed and collapsed into eleven research themes. The four most important research themes were: investigating issues around end of life decision making; mapping the scale and scope of the issue; investigating the quality of palliative care for people with intellectual disabilities, including the challenges in achieving best practice; and developing outcome measures and instruments for palliative care of people with intellectual disabilities. The proposal of four major priority areas and a range of minor themes for future research in intellectual disability, death, dying and palliative care will help researchers to focus limited resources and research expertise on areas where it is most needed and support the building of collaborations. The next steps are to cross-validate these research priorities with people with intellectual disabilities, carers, clinicians, researchers and other stakeholders across Europe; to validate them with local and national policy makers to determine how they could best be incorporated in policy and programmes; and to translate them into actual research studies by setting up European collaborations for specific studies that require such collaboration, develop research proposals and attract research funding.