Michael Bröcker

Prof. Michael Bröcker


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2018 in Earth and Planetary Science Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
STStephan Taetz
Stephan Taetz
TJTimm John
Timm John
MBMichael Bröcker
Michael Bröcker
CSCarl Spandler
Carl Spandler
ASAndreas Stracke
Andreas Stracke

6 April 2013 in Journal of Metamorphic Geology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MBMichael Bröcker
Michael Bröcker
SBS. Baldwin
S. Baldwin
RAR. Arkudas
R. Arkudas

1 June 2014 in Lithos
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MBMichael Bröcker
Michael Bröcker
KLKersten Löwen
Kersten Löwen
NRNikolay Rodionov
Nikolay Rodionov

1 April 2019 in Journal of Asian Earth Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AMAdi Maulana
Adi Maulana
ACAndrew G. Christy
Andrew G. Christy
DEDavid J. Ellis
David J. Ellis
MBMichael Bröcker
Michael Bröcker

27 July 2014 in International Journal of Earth Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KLKersten Löwen
Kersten Löwen
MBMichael Bröcker
Michael Bröcker
JBJasper Berndt
Jasper Berndt

16 May 2022 in Geological Magazine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MBMichael Bröcker
Michael Bröcker
ESErik E. Scherer
Erik E. Scherer
PXParis Xypolias
Paris Xypolias
MHMelina Höhn
Melina Höhn
This study corroborates interpretations suggesting that the Makrotantalon Unit on Andros represents a tectonic slice with Pelagonian affinity in the nappe stack of the Cycladic Blueschist Unit. Previously reported Cretaceous 40Ar–39Ar dates of a garnet-glaucophane schist from the Makrotantalon Unit could not be reproduced by Rb–Sr geochronology, but this is not an indication of contamination with excess Ar. Instead, the newly dated samples record disturbance of the Rb–Sr isotope system by partial recrystallization. Subsets of these phengite populations, representing the smaller grain-size fractions, yielded low-precision dates ranging from c. 21 to c. 15 Ma that document deformation-related resetting and recrystallization of a presumably Cretaceous white mica population. Although these Miocene dates cannot be linked with blueschist-facies metamorphism, they provide time constraints on the formation of shear zones that overprinted the original thrust contact during exhumation. The geological relevance of a Cretaceous high-pressure event is confirmed by a Rb–Sr date of c. 121 Ma for an epidote-glaucophane schist collected further away from the tectonic contact. The occurrence of a second blueschist-facies event in the Eocene is verified by Rb–Sr dates of two epidote-glaucophane schists (c. 40 Ma and c. 44 Ma) that can unambiguously be assigned to the Makrotantalon Unit.