Sharon R. Chinthrajah

Dr. Sharon R. Chinthrajah

Department of Medicine, Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94304, USA

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2017 in Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AMAndrew J. MacGinnitie
Andrew J. MacGinnitie
RRRima Rachid
Rima Rachid
HGHana Gragg
Hana Gragg
SLSara V. Little
Sara V. Little
PLPaul Lakin
Paul Lakin
LSLynda C. Schneider
Lynda C. Schneider

1 April 2016 in Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SCSharon R. Chinthrajah
Sharon R. Chinthrajah
JHJoseph D. Hernandez
Joseph D. Hernandez
SBScott D. Boyd
Scott D. Boyd
SGStephen J. Galli
Stephen J. Galli
Kari NadeauKari Nadeau
Kari Nadeau

1 February 2018 in The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SASandra Andorf
Sandra Andorf
NPNatasha Purington
Natasha Purington
WBWhitney M Block
Whitney M Block
ALAndrew J Long
Andrew J Long
DTDana Tupa
Dana Tupa
SCSharon R. Chinthrajah
Sharon R. Chinthrajah

24 January 2022 in Allergy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
IAIoana Agache
Ioana Agache
VSVanitha Sampath
Vanitha Sampath
Juan AguileraJuan Aguilera
Juan Aguilera
CACezmi A. Akdis
Cezmi A. Akdis
MAMubeccel Akdis
Mubeccel Akdis
Kari NadeauKari Nadeau
Kari Nadeau
There is increasing understanding, globally, that climate change and increased pollution will have a profound and mostly harmful effect on human health. This review brings together international experts to describe both the direct (such as heat waves) and indirect (such as vector‐borne disease incidence) health impacts of climate change. These impacts vary depending on vulnerability (i.e., existing diseases) and the international, economic, political, and environmental context. This unique review also expands on these issues to address a third category of potential longer‐term impacts on global health: famine, population dislocation, and environmental justice and education. This scholarly resource explores these issues fully, linking them to global health in urban and rural settings in developed and developing countries. The review finishes with a practical discussion of action that health professionals around the world in our field can yet take.

14 November 2019 in JCI Insight
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SCSharon R. Chinthrajah
Sharon R. Chinthrajah
SCShu Cao
Shu Cao
CLCherie Liu
Cherie Liu
SLShu-Chen Lyu
Shu-Chen Lyu
SSSayantani B. Sindher
Sayantani B. Sindher
Kari NadeauKari Nadeau
Kari Nadeau
BACKGROUND: IL-33, found in high levels in participants with allergic disorders, is thought to mediate allergic reactions. Etokimab, an anti–IL-33 biologic, has previously demonstrated a good safety profile and favorable pharmacodynamic properties in many clinical studies. METHODS: In this 6-week placebo-controlled phase 2a study, we evaluated the safety and the ability of a single dose of etokimab to desensitize peanut-allergic adults. Participants received either etokimab ( n = 15) or blinded placebo ( n = 5). Clinical tests included oral food challenges and skin prick tests at days 15 and 45. Blood samples were collected for IgE levels and measurement of ex vivo peanut-stimulated T cell cytokine production. RESULTS: Efficacy measurements for active vs. placebo participants at the day 15 and 45 food challenge (tolerating a cumulative 275 mg of peanut protein, which was the food challenge outcome defined in this paper) demonstrated, respectively, 73% vs. 0% ( P = 0.008) to 57% vs. 0% (ns). The etokimab group had fewer adverse events compared with placebo. IL-4, IL-5, IL-9, IL-13, and ST2 levels in CD4 + T cells were reduced in the active vs. placebo arm upon peanut-induced T cell activation ( P = 0.036 for IL-13 and IL-9 at day 15), and peanut-specific IgE was reduced in active vs. placebo ( P = 0.014 at day 15). CONCLUSION: The phase 2a results suggest etokimab is safe and well tolerated and that a single dose of etokimab could have the potential to desensitize peanut-allergic participants and possibly reduce atopy-related adverse events. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02920021. FUNDING: This work was supported by NIH grant R01AI140134, AnaptysBio, the Hartman Vaccine Fund, and the Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research at Stanford University.

25 January 2016 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JRJohn F. Ryan
John F. Ryan
RHRachel Hovde
Rachel Hovde
JGJacob Glanville
Jacob Glanville
SLShu-Chen Lyu
Shu-Chen Lyu
XJXuhuai Ji
Xuhuai Ji
Kari NadeauKari Nadeau
Kari Nadeau
Significance: The mechanisms through which successful immunotherapy induces possible deletion, replacement, or reprogramming of T cells are unknown. By evaluating the expression of T-cell–related genes, and using appropriate multivariate statistical approaches, our data show that successful immunotherapy can induce previously unidentified CD4+ T-cell subtypes during treatment that could help to predict an “immune-tolerant” clinical phenotype identified after cessation of treatment. The ability to use “anergic” transcriptional phenotypes in single T cells to predict successful “immune tolerance” induction in the clinic setting, as suggested by our findings, could lead to transformative impacts in the field of immunotherapy.