With the wide application of computed tomography in lung cancer screening, the incidence of multiple primary lung cancer (MPLC) has been increasingly reported. Despite the established criteria, the differentiation between MPLC and intrapulmonary metastasis remains challenging. Although histologic features are helpful in some circumstances, a molecular analysis is often needed. The application of next-generation sequencing could aid in distinguishing MPLCs from intrapulmonary metastasis, decreasing ambiguity. For MPLC management, surgery with lobectomy is the main operation method. Limited resection does not appear to negatively affect survival, and it is a reasonable alternative. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) has become a standard of care for patients refusing surgery or for those with medically inoperable early-stage lung cancer. However, the efficacy of SABR in MPLC management could only be found in retrospective series. Other local ablation techniques are an emerging alternative for the control of residual lesions. Furthermore, systemic therapies, such as targeted therapy for oncogene-addicted patients, and immunotherapy have shown promising results in MPLC management after resection. In this paper, the recent advances in the diagnosis and management of MPLC are reviewed.

Background: The most beneficial neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) combination for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in Asia remains uncertain. Herein, we compared the neoadjuvant carboplatin/paclitaxel (CROSS) regimen versus the cisplatin/5-fluorouracil (PF) regimen in combination with 41.4–50.4 Gy of radiotherapy. Methods: Patients were stratified according to their nCRT regimen: CROSS + 41.4–45.0 Gy (CROSS), PF + 45.0 Gy (PF4500) or PF + 50.4 Gy (PF5040). Propensity score matching by inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to balance the baseline variables. Results: Before IPTW, a total of 334 patients were included. The lowest chemotherapy completion rate was observed in the PF5040 group (76.2% versus 89.4% and 92.0% in the remaining two groups, respectively). Compared with CROSS, both PF groups showed more severe weight loss during nCRT and a higher frequency of post-esophagectomy anastomotic leaks. The use of PF5040 was associated with the highest rate of pathological complete response (45.3%). While CROSS conferred a significant overall survival benefit over PF4500 (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.30, 95% CI = 1.05 to 1.62, p = 0.018), similar survival figures were observed when compared with PF5040 (HR = 1.17, 95% CI = 0.94 to 1.45, p = 0.166). Conclusions: The CROSS regimen conferred a significant survival benefit over PF4500, although the similar survival figures were similar to those observed with PF5040. Considering the lower incidences of severe weight loss and post-esophagectomy anastomotic leaks, CROSS represents a safe and effective neoadjuvant treatment for Taiwanese patients with ESCC.

Background: Advances in surgical techniques and treatment modalities have improved the outcomes of esophageal cancer, yet difficult decision making for physicians while encountering multiple primary cancers (MPCs) continues to exist. The aim of this study was to evaluate long-term survival for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) associated with MPCs. Methods: Data from 544 patients with esophageal SCC who underwent surgery between 2005 and 2017 were reviewed to identify the presence of simultaneous or metachronous primary cancers. The prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) were analyzed. Results: Three hundred and ninety-seven patients after curative esophagectomy were included, with a median observation time of 44.2 months (range 2.6–178.6 months). Out of 52 patients (13.1%) with antecedent/synchronous cancers and 296 patients without MPCs (control group), 49 patients (12.3%) developed subsequent cancers after surgery. The most common site of other primary cancers was the head and neck (69/101; 68.3%), which showed no inferiority in OS. Sex and advanced clinical stage (III/IV) were independent risk factors (p = 0.031 and p < 0.001, respectively). Conclusion: Once curative esophagectomy can be achieved, surgery should be selected as a potential therapeutic approach if indicated, even with antecedent/synchronous MPCs. Subsequent primary cancers were often observed in esophageal SCC, and optimal surveillance planning was recommended.

The role of surgery in oligometastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains controversial. This study evaluated the oncological outcomes after esophagectomy in patients with ESCC with distant lymph node (LN) metastasis. Patients with ESCC and nodal metastasis treated with chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy followed by esophagectomy between 2010 and 2020 were included. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were compared between patients with distant LN metastasis (dLN+) and exclusively regional LN metastasis (dLN–). The cohort comprised 69 dLN+ and 111 dLN– patients. Survival was significantly better in the dLN– group than in the dLN+ group (5-year OS, 51.9% vs. 25.5%, P < 0.001; RFS, 47.2% vs. 18.1%, P < 0.001). Stratified by the yp stage, 49 (44.1%) dLN– and 30 (43.5%) dLN+ patients achieved a pathological complete response (pCR). In the dLN– and dLN+ groups, the OS rates were significantly higher in the pCR group than in the non-pCR group (dLN–: 76.7% vs. 32.4%, P < 0.001; dLN+: 39.6% vs. 14.2%; P = 0.002). The dLN–/pCR group had the best OS, significantly outperforming the dLN−/non-pCR and dLN+/pCR groups. OS did not differ between the dLN−/non-pCR and dLN+/pCR groups. The dLN+/non-pCR group had the worst OS. The RFS analysis paralleled the OS findings. Patients with dLN+ disease had worse outcomes than their dLN– counterparts, irrespective of the pCR status. The survival rates were poor but comparable between the dLN+/pCR and dLN−/non-pCR groups. Adjuvant therapy may be required for dLN+ patients following systemic treatment and surgery, even after achieving pCR.