The choice of marathon racing shoes can greatly affect performance. The purpose of this study is to metabolically and mechanically compare the consumer version of the Nike Vaporfly 4% shoe to two other popular marathon shoes, and determine differences in running economy. Nineteen subjects performed two 5-minute trials at 4.44m/s wearing the Adidas Adios Boost (AB), Nike Zoom Streak (ZS), and Nike Vaporfly 4% (VP) in random order. Oxygen uptake was recorded during minutes 3–5 and averaged across both shoe trials. On a second day, subjects wore reflective markers, and performed a 3-minute trial in each shoe. Motion and force data were collected over the final 30 seconds of each trial. VP oxygen uptake was 2.8% and 1.9% lower than the AB and ZS. Stride length, plantar flexion velocity, and center of mass vertical oscillation were significantly different in the VP. The percent benefit of the VP over AB shoe was predicted by subject ground time. These results indicate that use of the VP shoe results in improved running economy, partially due to differences in running mechanics. Subject variation in running economy improvement is only partially explained by variation in ground time.

Minimalist running shoes are becoming a more popular choice for runners in the past few years. However, there is little conclusive evidence about the advantages or disadvantages of running in these shoes. Although performance benefits may exist, injury may also occur from the added stress of running without the benefit of cushioning under the foot. Bone marrow edema can be a manifestation of added stress on the foot. This study measured bone marrow edema in runners' feet before and after a 10-wk period of transitioning from traditional to minimalist running shoes. Thirty-six experienced recreational runners underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before and after a 10-wk period. Seventeen subjects were in the control group (ran in their traditional shoes only for 10 wk), whereas the other 19 were in the experimental group (gradually transitioned to Vibram FiveFinger running shoes for 10 wk). The severity of the bone marrow edema was scored on a range of 0-4 (0 = no bone marrow edema, 4 = edema in more than 50% of the length of the bone). A score of 4 represented a stress fracture. Pretraining MRI scores were not statistically different between the groups. The posttraining MRI scores showed that more subjects in the Vibram group (10 of 19) showed increases in bone marrow edema in at least one bone after 10 wk of running than that in the control group (P = 0.009). Runners interested in transitioning to minimalist running shoes, such as Vibram FiveFingers, should transition very slowly and gradually to avoid potential stress injury in the foot.

In the finishing kick of a distance race, maximizing speed becomes the focus even if economy may be sacrificed. If distance runners knew how to alter their technique to become more sprint-like, this process could be more successful. In this study, we compared the differences in technique between sprinters and distance runners while running at equal and maximal speeds. Athletes consisted of 10 Division I distance runners, 10 Division I sprinters, and 10 healthy non-runners. They performed two tests, each consisting of a 60-m run on the track: Test 1 at a set pace of 5.81 m/s, while Test 2 was maximal speed. Video was collected at 180 Hz. Significant differences (P < 0.05) between the sprint and distance groups at maximal speeds were found in the following areas: speed, minimum hip angle, knee extension at toe-off, stride length, contact time, and recovery knee at touchdown. In Test 1, sprinters and distance runners displayed many of the same significant differences. The control group was similar to the distance group in both trials. As distance runners attempt to sprint, the desired adjustments do not necessarily occur. Distance runners may benefit from biomechanical interventions to improve running speed near the end of a race.

Electromechanical delay (EMD) is a measurement used to assess the mechanical lag between muscle activation onset and force production. EMD measurements may be performed by voluntary or electrically evoked muscle activation. This study compared gastrocnemius EMD during voluntary and involuntary contractions and assessd the intrasession reliability of each set of measurements. Subjects were 15 volunteers (age 21 ± 2 years, ht 171.8 ± 10.0 cm, mass 76.1 ± 13.4 kg). EMD measurements were recorded from the medial head of the gastrocnemius of each subject during voluntary and involuntary contractions. Order was counterbalanced between subjects. Subjects stood with the dominant leg on a force plate, the nondominant next to the force plate, and with their hands in contact with a bar in front of them. A supramaximal percutaneous stimulus was applied to the tibial nerve in the popliteal fossa for involuntary (electrically evoked) contractions. For voluntary contractions, subjects were instructed to rise up on the toes as quickly as possible. Four trials were collected for each condition with 30 s of rest between each. Repeated measures ANOVAs were performed for each condition to calculate an ICC (2,1). Means of the 4 trials for each condition were used to detect differences between groups. EMD was greater in the voluntary condition (22.8 ± 8.2 ms) compared to the involuntary condition (9.7 ± 3.1 ms; p < .001). Intrasession reliability for each condition was very strong (involuntary ICC (2,1) = .977; voluntary ICC (2,1) = .972). EMD measured during a single leg stance is much shorter when measured during an electrically evoked (voluntary) contraction. The difference in EMD between conditions is likely the result of differences in recruitment during the two types of contractions. Reliability within a measurement session was very strong for each of the conditions.