Ayni Sharif

Ms. Ayni Sharif

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

5Years (2022-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
RFRomina Fakhraei
Romina Fakhraei
KDKathryn Denize
Kathryn Denize
ASAlexandre Simon
Alexandre Simon
ASAyni Sharif
Ayni Sharif
JZJulia Zhu-Pawlowsky
Julia Zhu-Pawlowsky
LGLaura Gaudet
Laura Gaudet
Obesity is a well-recognized risk factor for pregnancy complications. Most studies to date are in large cohorts, with results presented in a way that assumes all women living with obesity are at equal risk. This study investigates which women living with obesity are at higher risk of specific pregnancy complications. A systematic search of MEDLINE and Embase identified 7894 prospective or retrospective cohort studies exploring predictors of adverse outcomes among pregnant women living with obesity. Following screening, 61 studies were deemed eligible. Studies were selected if the effects of exposure to any predictor amongst pregnant women living with obesity could be collected. Maternal characteristics assessed for association with adverse outcomes included maternal age, race/ethnicity, maternal height, mode of conception, complement activation factors, and history of various comorbidities/procedures. Gestational diabetes mellitus was the most studied outcome (n = 32), followed by preterm birth (n = 29), preeclampsia (n = 27), low birthweight infants (n = 20), small for gestational age newborns (n = 12), and stillbirth (n = 7). This review identified important characteristics that should be considered during the screening and follow-up sessions of pregnant women living with obesity, including pre-existing type 1 diabetes, maternal age < 20 years or ≥35 years, non-White ethnicity, abdominal adiposity obesity, and history of bariatric surgery.

19 October 2022 in JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ASAyni Sharif
Ayni Sharif
KBKira Bombay
Kira Bombay
MMMalia S Q Murphy
Malia S Q Murphy
RMRebecca K Murray
Rebecca K Murray
LSLindsey Sikora
Lindsey Sikora
DCDaniel J Corsi
Daniel J Corsi
Background: Cannabis use among reproductive-aged Canadians is increasing, but our understanding of its impacts on fertility, pregnancy, and breast milk is still evolving. Despite the availability of many web-based resources, informed decision-making and patient counseling are challenging for expectant families and providers alike. Objective: We aimed to conduct a scoping review of publicly available web-based Canadian resources to provide information on the effects of cannabis on fertility, pregnancy, and breast milk. Methods: Following PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews), we systematically searched 8 databases between January 1, 2010, and November 30, 2020, and web pages of 71 Canadian obstetrical, government, and public health organizations. We included English resources discussing the effects of cannabis on fertility, pregnancy, breastfeeding, or the exposed fetus and infant. Epidemiological characteristics, readability, and content information were extracted and summarized. Results: A total of 183 resources met our inclusion criteria. Resources included content for public audiences (163/183, 89.1%) and health care providers (HCPs; 31/183, 16.9%). The resources were authored by national-level (46/183, 25.1%), provincial or territorial (65/183, 35.5%), and regional (72/183, 39.3%) organizations. All provinces and territories had at least one resource attributed to them. The majority (125/183, 68.3%) were written at a >10 grade reading level, and a few (7/183, 3.8%) were available in languages other than English or French. The breadth of content on fertility (55/183, 30.1%), pregnancy (173/183, 94.5%), and breast milk or breastfeeding (133/183, 72.7%) varied across resources. Common themes included citing a need for more research into the effects of cannabis on reproductive health and recommending that patients avoid or discontinue cannabis use. Although resources for providers were consistent in recommending patient counseling, resources targeting the public were less likely to encourage seeking advice from HCPs (23/163, 14.1%). Conclusions: Canadian resources consistently identify that there is no known safe amount of cannabis that can be consumed in the context of fertility, pregnancy, and breastfeeding. Areas of improvement include increasing readability and language accessibility and encouraging bidirectional communication between HCPs and patients. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): RR2-10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045006

21 February 2022 in JMIR Preprints
Verified
Preprint
Open access
ASAyni Sharif
Ayni Sharif
KBKira Bombay
Kira Bombay
MMMalia S. Q. Murphy
Malia S. Q. Murphy
RMRebecca K. Murray
Rebecca K. Murray
LSLindsey Sikora
Lindsey Sikora
DCDaniel J Corsi
Daniel J Corsi
BACKGROUND Cannabis use among reproductive-aged Canadians is increasing, but our understanding of its impacts on fertility, pregnancy, and breastmilk is still evolving. Despite the availability of many online resources, informed-decision making and patient counselling are challenging for expectant families and providers alike. OBJECTIVE To conduct a scoping review of publicly available online Canadian resources providing information on the effects of cannabis on fertility, pregnancy, and breastmilk. METHODS We systematically searched eight databases between 1-Jan-2010 and 30-Nov-2020 and webpages of 71 Canadian obstetrical, government, and public health organizations. English resources discussing the effects of cannabis on fertility, pregnancy, breastfeeding, or the exposed fetus/infant were included. Epidemiological characteristics, readability, and content information were extracted and summarized. RESULTS A total of 183 met our inclusion criteria. Resources included content for public audiences (89.1%) and healthcare providers (n=31, 16.9%). The majority (68.3%) were written at a 10+ reading-grade level, and few (3.8%) were available in languages other than English or French. Common themes included citing a need for more research into the effects of cannabis on reproductive health and recommending that patients avoid or discontinue use. Although resources for providers were consistent in recommending patient counselling, resources targeting the public were less likely to encourage seeking advice from healthcare providers (n=23, 14.1%). CONCLUSIONS Canadian resources consistently identify that there is no known safe amount of cannabis that can be consumed in the context of fertility, pregnancy, and breastfeeding. Areas of improvement include increasing readability, language accessibility, and encouraging bidirectional communication between healthcare providers and patients. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT RR2-10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045006