Both periodontal disease (PD) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), are important diseases of the alimentary tract. Microbiome and immune-mediated inflammatory processes play important roles in these diseases. An association between PD and IBD may exist. This study investigated the risk of IBD in patients with PD. This study used data from the National Health Insurance Research Database of Taiwan from 1996 to 2013. A total of 27,041 patients with PD were enrolled as a study group, and 108,149 patients without PD were selected as the control group after matching by gender, age, insured region, urbanization, and income with a 1:4 ratio. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to calculate the risk of IBD. Of the 135,190 participants enrolled in this study, 5392 (4%) with newly diagnosed IBD were identified. The overall incidence of subsequent IBD was similar in both groups (3.8% vs. 4%, adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 1.01, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.94–1.08). However, an increased risk of UC in the PD group was found after adjusting confounding factors (aHR: 1.56, 95% CI: 1.13–2.15; p < 0.05). This study demonstrated that patients with PD had approximately one-half higher risk of subsequent UC. Further studies are warranted to elucidate the relationship between PD and UC.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) had caused huge health losses worldwide. Several drugs had been applied to treat patients with COVID-19, and repurposing colchicine had been proposed for its anti-inflammatory properties via several pathways. In this systematic review, we evaluated the effects of colchicine treatment. From inception to May 31, 2021, databases, including PubMed, EMbase, medRxiv, and Research Square were searched, and 11 studies were enrolled. A total of 17,205 COVID-19 patients with male predominance (62.9%) were analyzed. Patients with colchicine treatment had a significantly lower risk of mortality (odds ratio (OR): 0.57, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.38–0.87, I²: 72%; p < 0.01) and a non-significantly lower rate of mechanical ventilation (OR: 0.67, 95%CI: 0.39–1.15). The side effects were mild and not significantly different (OR: 2.03, 95%CI: 0.51–8.09). Subgroup analysis with randomized controlled trials showed no statistically significant difference in the mortality (OR: 0.80, 95%CI: 0.44–1.46, I²: 33%; p = 0.22). In conclusion, our meta-analysis found that colchicine treatment was associated with a significantly lower risk of mortality in patients with COVID-19. However, this benefit was not observed in the subgroup analysis of randomized controlled trials. Further randomized controlled studies are required to confirm the potential benefits of colchicine treatment.

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic, immune-mediated disorder of the esophagus with rising prevalence. Dupilumab (DUPI), a monoclonal antibody that targets the interleukin-4 receptor α, has shown promise as a treatment option. We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials searching the PubMed/Medline database, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and the medRxiv preprint server up to 31 July 2024, assessing DUPI’s efficacy and optimal dosing in the treatment of EoE. Finally, three randomized-controlled trials comprising 470 participants, including 102 children under 12 years of age, were included in the qualitative synthesis. Both high-exposure (HE-DUPI, 300 mg weekly) and low-exposure (LE-DUPI, 300 mg biweekly) regimens achieved significant histologic remission relative to placebo (OR = 26.88, 95% CI 11.98–60.29 for LE-DUPI; OR = 29.15, 95% CI 13.68–62.12 for HE-DUPI). Although overall adverse events were comparable between groups, HE-DUPI was associated with a notable increase in serious adverse events. These findings suggest that DUPI is effective in promoting histologic remission in EoE, with LE-DUPI emerging as a preferred option for balancing efficacy and safety. This study highlights the efficacy and safety profiles of different dosing regimens and pediatric groups. Further studies are warranted to explore long-term outcomes and identify patient subgroups that may derive the greatest benefit from DUPI therapy.

Osteopontin, also referred to as bone sialoprotein I or secreted phosphoprotein 1, is a multifunctional glycoprotein implicated in numerous physiological and pathological processes. Initially identified in the early 1980s in osseous tissue, OPN plays a critical role in biomineralization and bone remodeling. It is expressed in a wide range of tissues and exerts its biological effects through binding to integrins and CD44 receptors on target cell surfaces, thereby modulating intracellular signaling pathways involved in immune regulation and inflammatory responses. Functionally, OPN acts as a cytokine that mediates cell-matrix interactions, facilitating cell adhesion, migration, and immune cell activation. Recent studies have proposed that the inclusion of OPN in infant formula may confer immunological and gastrointestinal benefits comparable to those observed in breastfed infants. Consequently, OPN is being investigated as a functional ingredient to enhance the nutritional and developmental efficacy of infant formula. While exclusive breastfeeding remains the gold standard for infant nutrition and developmental support, OPN-fortified formula may serve as a viable alternative when breast milk is unavailable or insufficient.