The high cracking sensitivity of Al-Cu-Mg alloy limits its application in wire + arc additive manufacturing (WAAM). In this paper, a double-wire cold metal transfer (CMT) arc additive manufacturing system was applied. ER2319 and ER5183 wires were selected as feedstocks and a new type of high-strength, crack-free Al-Cu-Mg alloy was manufactured. T6 (solution and artificial aging) heat treatment was conducted to further improve the mechanical properties. The microstructure, the second phase, distribution of main alloy elements and fracture morphology of Al-Cu-Mg alloys in both as-deposited and T6 heat-treated conditions were analyzed by optical micrographs (OM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), respectively. The micro-hardness and tensile properties of WAAM Al-Cu-Mg alloy in both as-deposited and T6 heat-treated conditions were tested. The results demonstrated that the microstructure of the as-deposited Al-Cu-Mg alloy was composed of short rod-shaped columnar grains, equiaxed grains in the inter-layer region, and coarsen equiaxed grains in the inner-layer region; most of the second phases were continuously distributed along the grain boundaries. After the T6 heat treatment, α(Al) grains became coarsened, most of second phases were dissolved, and the Cu and Mg elements were distributed homogeneously in the aluminum matrix. The micro-hardness and strength were significantly improved but the elongation was reduced.

Martensitic stainless steel containing 13% Cr–4% Ni suffers cavitation erosion (CE) as the common material of hydro turbine impellers. Two 13% Cr–4% Ni stainless steel samples were obtained by different melting and heating processes. One was of relatively low toughness but high ductility (LTHD), and the other was of relatively high toughness but low ductility (HTLD). This paper is to clarify the relationship between the mechanical properties and the CE resistance of the experimental steel samples. The CE of the two materials was studied using an ultrasonic vibration cavitation erosion rig. Mass loss, morphological observation, nanoindentation characterization, and tensile tests were employed to clarify the erosion mechanism. The results showed that LTHD stainless steel had slightly higher ductility, but lower toughness than HTLD material. The mass loss method verified that the CE resistance of LTHD material was higher than that for the HTLD material. In addition, both materials had an incubation stage of 2 h in the distilled water. The SEM revealed that material removal was preferentially initiated from the grain boundaries and slip zone after the incubation period. The ductility could delay the fracture of the material, which contributed more to cavitation erosion resistance than the toughness of the materials. The hardness test showed few relationships with the CE resistance.