Martin Richard Pool

Dr. Martin Richard Pool


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

31Years (1996-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
26 February 2004 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MHMario Halic
Mario Halic
TBThomas Becker
Thomas Becker
MPMartin Richard Pool
Martin Richard Pool
CSChristian M. T. Spahn
Christian M. T. Spahn
RGRobert A. Grassucci
Robert A. Grassucci
RBRoland Beckmann
Roland Beckmann

29 October 2006 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MHMario Halic
Mario Halic
MBMichael Blau
Michael Blau
TBThomas Becker
Thomas Becker
TMThorsten Mielke
Thorsten Mielke
MPMartin Richard Pool
Martin Richard Pool
RBRoland Beckmann
Roland Beckmann

1 November 2013 in Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YNYvonne Nyathi
Yvonne Nyathi
BWBarrie M. Wilkinson
Barrie M. Wilkinson
MPMartin Richard Pool
Martin Richard Pool

31 May 2011 in PLOS Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GFGabriella M. A. Forte
Gabriella M. A. Forte
MPMartin Richard Pool
Martin Richard Pool
CSColin J. Stirling
Colin J. Stirling
Amino-terminal acetylation is probably the most common protein modification in eukaryotes with as many as 50%–80% of proteins reportedly altered in this way. Here we report a systematic analysis of the predicted N-terminal processing of cytosolic proteins versus those destined to be sorted to the secretory pathway. While cytosolic proteins were profoundly biased in favour of processing, we found an equal and opposite bias against such modification for secretory proteins. Mutations in secretory signal sequences that led to their acetylation resulted in mis-sorting to the cytosol in a manner that was dependent upon the N-terminal processing machinery. Hence N-terminal acetylation represents an early determining step in the cellular sorting of nascent polypeptides that appears to be conserved across a wide range of species. The eukaryotic cell comprises several distinct compartments, called organelles, required to perform specific functions. The proteins in these compartments are almost always synthesised in the cytoplasm and so require complex sorting mechanisms to ensure their delivery to the appropriate organelle. Of course, not all proteins need to leave the cytoplasm since many remain there to perform cytoplasmic functions. It is well known that many proteins are modified by acetylation of their amino-terminus at a very early stage in their synthesis. We have discovered a profound difference between the likelihood of such a modification on cytoplasmic proteins and on those destined for one of the major organelles, the endoplasmic reticulum (ER): whereas cytoplasmic proteins are typically acetylated, those bound for the ER are largely unmodified. Moreover, when specific ER proteins were engineered to induce their acetylation we found that their targeting to the ER was inhibited. Our data suggest that N-terminal acetylation is a major determinant in protein sorting in eukaryotes.

23 August 2002 in Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MPMartin Richard Pool
Martin Richard Pool
JSJoachim Stumm
Joachim Stumm
TFTudor A. Fulga
Tudor A. Fulga
ISIrmgard Sinning
Irmgard Sinning
BDBernhard Dobberstein
Bernhard Dobberstein
Signal recognition particle (SRP), together with its receptor (SR), mediates the targeting of ribosome-nascent chain complexes to the endoplasmic reticulum. Using protein cross-linking, we detected distinct modes in the binding of SRP to the ribosome. During signal peptide recognition, SRP54 is positioned at the exit site close to ribosomal proteins L23a and L35. When SRP54 contacts SR, SRP54 is rearranged such that it is no longer close to L23a. This repositioning may allow the translocon to dock with the ribosome, leading to insertion of the signal peptide into the translocation channel.

5 May 2006 in Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MHMario Halic
Mario Halic
MGMarco Gartmann
Marco Gartmann
OSOliver Schlenker
Oliver Schlenker
TMThorsten Mielke
Thorsten Mielke
MPMartin Richard Pool
Martin Richard Pool
RBRoland Beckmann
Roland Beckmann
Signal sequences of secretory and membrane proteins are recognized by the signal recognition particle (SRP) as they emerge from the ribosome. This results in their targeting to the membrane by docking with the SRP receptor, which facilitates transfer of the ribosome to the translocon. Here, we present the 8 angstrom cryo–electron microscopy structure of a “docking complex” consisting of a SRP-bound 80 S ribosome and the SRP receptor. Interaction of the SRP receptor with both SRP and the ribosome rearranged the S domain of SRP such that a ribosomal binding site for the translocon, the L23e/L35 site, became exposed, whereas Alu domain–mediated elongation arrest persisted.