Vinayak Gorakhanath Wagaskar

Dr. Vinayak Gorakhanath Wagaskar

Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 August 2021 in European Urology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Vinayak Gorakhanath WagaskarVinayak Gorakhanath Wagaskar
Vinayak Gorakhanath Wagaskar
AMAnkur Mittal
Ankur Mittal
SSStanislaw Sobotka
Stanislaw Sobotka
PRParita Ratnani
Parita Ratnani
ALAnna Lantz
Anna Lantz
ATAsh Tewari
Ash Tewari

4 March 2021 in Cancer Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Vinayak Gorakhanath WagaskarVinayak Gorakhanath Wagaskar
Vinayak Gorakhanath Wagaskar
SSStanislaw Sobotka
Stanislaw Sobotka
PRParita Ratnani
Parita Ratnani
JYJames Young
James Young
ALAnna Lantz
Anna Lantz
ATAsh Tewari
Ash Tewari
Background: The detection of prostate cancer requires histological confirmation in biopsy core. Currently, number of unnecessary prostate biopsies are being performed in the United States. This is due to the absence of appropriate biopsy decision‐making protocol.Aim: To develop and validate a 4K score/multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)‐based nomogram to predict prostate cancer (PCa), clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa), and unfavorable prostate cancer (uPCa).Methods and Results: Retrospective, single‐center study evaluating a cohort of 574 men with 4K score test >7% or suspicious digital rectal examination (DRE) or Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI‐RADS) scores 3, 4, or 5 on mpMRI that underwent systematic and/or mpMRI/ultrasound fusion–targeted prostate biopsy between 2016 and 2020. External cohort included 622 men. csPCa and uPCa were defined as Gleason score ≥3 + 4 and ≥4 + 3 on biopsy, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to build nomogram for predicting PCa, csPCa, and uPCa. Validation was performed by plotting the area under the curve (AUC) and comparing nomogram‐predicted probabilities with actual rates of PCa, csPCa, and uPCa probabilities in the external cohort.4K score, a PI‐RADS ≥4, prostate volume and prior negative biopsy were significant predictors of PCa, csPCa, and uPCa. AUCs were 0.84, 0.88, and 0.86 for the prediction of PCa, csPCa, and uPCa, respectively. The predicted and actual rates of PCa, csPCa, and uPCa showed agreement across all percentage probability ranges in the validation cohort. Using the prediction model at threshold of 30, 30% of overall biopsies, 41% of benign biopsies, and 19% of diagnosed indolent PCa could be avoided, while missing 9% of csPCa.Conclusion: This novel nomogram would reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies and decrease detection of clinically insignificant PCa.

1 June 2021 in European Urology Open Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Vinayak Gorakhanath WagaskarVinayak Gorakhanath Wagaskar
Vinayak Gorakhanath Wagaskar
MLMicah Levy
Micah Levy
PRParita Ratnani
Parita Ratnani
KMKate Moody
Kate Moody
MGMariely Garcia
Mariely Garcia
ATAsh Tewari
Ash Tewari
Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly used to diagnose prostate cancer (PCa). It is not yet established whether all men with negative MRI (Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System version 2 score 4 ng/ml, 4Kscore of >7%, PSA density ≥0.15 ng/ml/cm3, and/or suspicious digital rectal examination. The validation cohort included 182 men from another centre (University of Miami) with negative MRI who underwent systematic prostate biopsy with the same criteria. csPCa was defined as Gleason grade group ≥2 on biopsy. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed using coefficients of logit function for predicting PCa and csPCa. Nomogram validation was performed by calculating the area under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) and comparing nomogram-predicted probabilities with actual rates of PCa and csPCa. Of 200 men in the development cohort, 18% showed PCa and 8% showed csPCa on biopsy. Of 182 men in the validation cohort, 21% showed PCa and 6% showed csPCa on biopsy. PSA density, 4Kscore, and family history of PCa were significant predictors for PCa and csPCa. The AUC was 0.80 and 0.87 for prediction of PCa and csPCa, respectively. There was agreement between predicted and actual rates of PCa in the validation cohort. Using the prediction model at threshold of 40, 47% of benign biopsies and 15% of indolent PCa cases diagnosed could be avoided, while missing 10% of csPCa cases. The small sample size and number of events are limitations of the study. Our prediction model can reduce the number of prostate biopsies among men with negative MRI without compromising the detection of csPCa. We developed a tool for selection of men with negative MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) findings for prostate cancer who should undergo prostate biopsy. This risk prediction tool safely reduces the number of men who need to undergo the procedure.

31 May 2022 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Dimple ChakravartyDimple Chakravarty
Dimple Chakravarty
PRParita Ratnani
Parita Ratnani
LHLi Huang
Li Huang
ZDZach Dovey
Zach Dovey
SSStanislaw Sobotka
Stanislaw Sobotka
ATAsh Tewari
Ash Tewari
The impact of pelvic inflammation on prostate cancer (PCa) biology and aggressive phenotype has never been studied. Our study objective was to evaluate the role of pelvic inflammation on PCa aggressiveness and its association with clinical outcomes in patients following radical prostatectomy (RP). This study has been conducted on a retrospective single-institutional consecutive cohort of 2278 patients who underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) between 01/2013 and 10/2019. Data from 2085 patients were analyzed to study the association between pelvic inflammation and adverse pathology (AP), defined as Gleason Grade Group (GGG) > 2 and ≥ pT3 stage, at resection. In a subset of 1997 patients, the association between pelvic inflammation and biochemical recurrence (BCR) was studied. Alteration in tumor transcriptome and inflammatory markers in patients with and without pelvic inflammation were studied using microarray analysis, immunohistochemistry, and culture supernatants derived from inflamed sites used in functional assays. Changes in blood inflammatory markers in the study cohort were analyzed by O-link. In univariate analyses, pelvic inflammation emerged as a significant predictor of AP. Multivariate cox proportional-hazards regression analyses showed that high pelvic inflammation with pT3 stage and positive surgical margins significantly affected the time to BCR (p ≤ 0.05). PCa patients with high inflammation had elevated levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines in their tissues and in blood. Genes involved in epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and DNA damage response were upregulated in patients with pelvic inflammation. Attenuation of STAT and IL-6 signaling decreased tumor driving properties of conditioned medium from inflamed sites. Pelvic inflammation exacerbates the progression of prostate cancer and drives an aggressive phenotype.

27 September 2022 in Cancer Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Vinayak Gorakhanath WagaskarVinayak Gorakhanath Wagaskar
Vinayak Gorakhanath Wagaskar
MLMicah Levy
Micah Levy
PRParita Ratnani
Parita Ratnani
SSSharmila Sullimada
Sharmila Sullimada
MGMae Gerenia
Mae Gerenia
ATAsh Tewari
Ash Tewari
Background: 70%–80% of prostate cancer (PCa) biopsies performed in the US annually may be unnecessary. Specific antigen testing (PSA) and tans rectal ultrasound (TRUS) are imprecise predictive methods for risk of PCa. Novel strategies are critical to guide biopsy decision‐making.Aim: We assessed the utility and accuracy of combining Select MDx and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) scores for predicting risk of PCa.Methods and Results: Our study was conducted at Mount Sinai hospital at Urology department in New York City from January 2020 to April 2021. Total 129 men performed select MDx test. Indications for prostate biopsy were high‐risk Select MDx score, suspicious DRE, PI‐RADS scores 3/4/5 on mpMRI, or any combination of these. Fifty‐one percentage of 129 patients underwent systemic or combined systemic and MRI/US (ultrasound) fusion biopsy; All men underwent 3 T MRI of Prostate w/wo contrast using standard protocols prior to biopsy. A single surgeon performed prostate biopsies.Gleason score ≥3 + 3 on biopsy is defined as outcome. Descriptive statistics were calculated as cross tables. Binary logistic regression model is used to determine the outcome. The nomogram was based on the coefficients of the logit function. ROCs were plotted and decision curve analysis was performed.Using both high‐risk Select MDx and PI‐RADS scores of 4/5, 87% of biopsies could have been avoided, while detecting 64% of PCa and missing 36%. If biopsies were performed on men with positive Select MDx or PI‐RADS 4/5 results, 16% of biopsies could have been avoided while detecting all PCa. Combining these scores improved specificity and accuracy for the detection of PCa over either used alone. Study limitations include limited sample size, sole institution study, and risk or overfitting for the proposed model which may limit generalizability.Conclusion: Combining SelectMDx and mpMRI PI‐PADS scores of 4/5 may be useful for PCa biopsy decision‐making.

1 January 2016 in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Vinayak Gorakhanath WagaskarVinayak Gorakhanath Wagaskar
Vinayak Gorakhanath Wagaskar
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research aims to publish findings of doctors at grass root level and post graduate students, so that all unique medical experiences are recorded in literature.