Temperature dependent Raman intensity of 2D materials features very rich information about the material's electronic structure, optical properties, and nm-level interface spacing. To date, there still lacks rigorous consideration of the combined effects. This renders the Raman intensity information less valuable in material studies. In this work, the Raman intensity of four supported multilayered WS2 samples are studied from 77 K to 757 K under 532 nm laser excitation. Resonance Raman scattering is observed, and we are able to evaluate the excitonic transition energy of B exciton and its broadening parameters. However, the resonance Raman effects cannot explain the Raman intensity variation in the high temperature range (room temperature to 757 K). The thermal expansion mismatch between WS2 and Si substrate at high temperatures (room temperature to 757 K) make the optical interference effects very strong and enhances the Raman intensity significantly. This interference effect is studied in detail by rigorously calculating and considering the thermal expansion of samples, the interface spacing change, and the optical indices change with temperature. Considering all of the above factors, it is concluded that the temperature dependent Raman intensity of the WS2 samples cannot be solely interpreted by its resonance behavior. The interface optical interference impacts the Raman intensity more significantly than the change of refractive indices with temperature.
Due to its intriguing thermal and electrical properties, graphene has been widely studied for potential applications in sensor and energy devices. However, the reported value for its thermal conductivity spans from dozens to thousands of W m−1 K−1 due to different levels of alternations and defects in graphene samples. In this work, the thermal diffusivity of suspended four-layered graphene foam (GF) is characterized from room temperature (RT) down to 17 K. For the first time, we identify the defect level in graphene by evaluating the inverse of thermal diffusivity (termed “thermal reffusivity”: Θ) at the 0 K limit. By using the Debye model of Θ = Θ0 + C × e−θ/2T and fitting the Θ–T curve to the point of T = 0 K, we identify the defect level (Θ0) and determine the Debye temperature of graphene. Θ0 is found to be 1878 s m−2 for the studied GF and 43–112 s m−2 for three highly crystalline graphite materials. This uncovers a 16–43-fold higher defect level in GF than that in pyrolytic graphite. In GF, the phonon mean free path solely induced by defects and boundary scattering is determined as 166 nm. The Debye temperature of graphene is determined to be 1813 K, which is very close to the average theoretical Debye temperature (1911 K) of the three acoustic phonon modes in graphene. By subtracting the defect effect, we report the ideal thermal diffusivity and conductivity (κideal) of graphene presented in the 3D foam structure in the range of 33–299 K. Detailed physics based on chemical composition and structure analysis are given to explain the κideal–T profile by comparing with those reported for suspended graphene.