Yangsu Xie

Dr. Yangsu Xie

College of Chemistry and Environmental Engineering, Shenzhen University

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2016 in Carbon
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Yangsu XieYangsu Xie
Yangsu Xie
SXShen Xu
Shen Xu
ZXZaoli Xu
Zaoli Xu
HWHongchao Wu
Hongchao Wu
CDCheng Deng
Cheng Deng
XWXinwei Wang
Xinwei Wang

10 October 2019 in ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Kai WuKai Wu
Kai Wu
LYLuping Yu
Luping Yu
CLChuxin Lei
Chuxin Lei
JHJiexin Huang
Jiexin Huang
DLDingyao Liu
Dingyao Liu
QFQiang Fu
Qiang Fu

24 February 2020 in Nanoscale
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HZHamidreza Zobeiri
Hamidreza Zobeiri
SXShen Xu
Shen Xu
YYYanan Yue
Yanan Yue
QZQianying Zhang
Qianying Zhang
Yangsu XieYangsu Xie
Yangsu Xie
Xinwei WangXinwei Wang
Xinwei Wang
Temperature dependent Raman intensity of 2D materials features very rich information about the material's electronic structure, optical properties, and nm-level interface spacing. To date, there still lacks rigorous consideration of the combined effects. This renders the Raman intensity information less valuable in material studies. In this work, the Raman intensity of four supported multilayered WS2 samples are studied from 77 K to 757 K under 532 nm laser excitation. Resonance Raman scattering is observed, and we are able to evaluate the excitonic transition energy of B exciton and its broadening parameters. However, the resonance Raman effects cannot explain the Raman intensity variation in the high temperature range (room temperature to 757 K). The thermal expansion mismatch between WS2 and Si substrate at high temperatures (room temperature to 757 K) make the optical interference effects very strong and enhances the Raman intensity significantly. This interference effect is studied in detail by rigorously calculating and considering the thermal expansion of samples, the interface spacing change, and the optical indices change with temperature. Considering all of the above factors, it is concluded that the temperature dependent Raman intensity of the WS2 samples cannot be solely interpreted by its resonance behavior. The interface optical interference impacts the Raman intensity more significantly than the change of refractive indices with temperature.

12 May 2020 in ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
XDXin Deng
Xin Deng
QNQichun Nie
Qichun Nie
YWYu Wu
Yu Wu
HFHaisheng Fang
Haisheng Fang
PZPeixin Zhang
Peixin Zhang
Yangsu XieYangsu Xie
Yangsu Xie

17 September 2018 in Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PYPengyu Yuan
Pengyu Yuan
Ridong WangRidong Wang
Ridong Wang
TWTianyu Wang
Tianyu Wang
Xinwei WangXinwei Wang
Xinwei Wang
Yangsu XieYangsu Xie
Yangsu Xie
The thermal conductivity of supported MoS2 is discovered to first decrease with thickness (<9.2 nm), then increase with thickness.

1 May 2015 in Nanoscale
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Yangsu XieYangsu Xie
Yangsu Xie
ZXZaoli Xu
Zaoli Xu
SXShen Xu
Shen Xu
ZCZhe Cheng
Zhe Cheng
NHNastaran Hashemi
Nastaran Hashemi
Xinwei WangXinwei Wang
Xinwei Wang
Due to its intriguing thermal and electrical properties, graphene has been widely studied for potential applications in sensor and energy devices. However, the reported value for its thermal conductivity spans from dozens to thousands of W m−1 K−1 due to different levels of alternations and defects in graphene samples. In this work, the thermal diffusivity of suspended four-layered graphene foam (GF) is characterized from room temperature (RT) down to 17 K. For the first time, we identify the defect level in graphene by evaluating the inverse of thermal diffusivity (termed “thermal reffusivity”: Θ) at the 0 K limit. By using the Debye model of Θ = Θ0 + C × e−θ/2T and fitting the Θ–T curve to the point of T = 0 K, we identify the defect level (Θ0) and determine the Debye temperature of graphene. Θ0 is found to be 1878 s m−2 for the studied GF and 43–112 s m−2 for three highly crystalline graphite materials. This uncovers a 16–43-fold higher defect level in GF than that in pyrolytic graphite. In GF, the phonon mean free path solely induced by defects and boundary scattering is determined as 166 nm. The Debye temperature of graphene is determined to be 1813 K, which is very close to the average theoretical Debye temperature (1911 K) of the three acoustic phonon modes in graphene. By subtracting the defect effect, we report the ideal thermal diffusivity and conductivity (κideal) of graphene presented in the 3D foam structure in the range of 33–299 K. Detailed physics based on chemical composition and structure analysis are given to explain the κideal–T profile by comparing with those reported for suspended graphene.