Oktavija Đaković Rode

Prof. Dr. Oktavija Đaković Rode

University Hospital for Infectious Diseases, Zagreb; University of Zagreb, School of Dental Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
20 January 2022 in Vaccines
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
OROktavija Đaković Rode
Oktavija Đaković Rode
KBKristian Bodulić
Kristian Bodulić
SZSanja Zember
Sanja Zember
NBNatasa Cetinic Balent
Natasa Cetinic Balent
ANAnđa Novokmet
Anđa Novokmet
Alemka MarkotićAlemka Markotić
Alemka Markotić
Research on post-vaccination antibody dynamics has become pivotal in estimating COVID-19 vaccine efficacy. We studied anti-SARS-CoV-2 Spike RBD IgG levels in 587 healthcare workers (2038 sera) who completed BNT162b2 vaccination. Average antibody titer 3 weeks after the first dose in COVID-19-naïve participants (median 873.5 AU/mL) was 18-fold higher than the test threshold, with a significant increase 1 month (median 9927.2 AU/mL) and an exponential decrease 3 (median 2976.7 AU/mL) and 6 (median 966.0 AU/mL) months after complete vaccination. Participants with a history of COVID-19 prior to vaccination showed significantly higher antibody levels, particularly after the first dose (median 14,280.2 AU/mL), with a slight decline 1 month (median 12,700.0 AU/mL) and an exponential decline in antibody titers 3 (median 4831.0 AU/mL) and 6 (median 1465.2 AU/mL) months after vaccination. Antibody levels of COVID-19-naïve subjects after the first dose were moderately correlated with age (r = −0.4). Multivariate analysis showed a strong independent correlation between IgG levels 6 months after vaccination and both IgG titers after the first dose and 1 month after vaccination (R2 = 0.709). Regardless of pre-vaccination COVID-19 history, IgG levels 6 months after vaccination were comparable to antibody levels reached by COVID-19-naïve participants after the first vaccine dose.

19 March 2019 in BMC Infectious Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Lorena JemeršićLorena Jemeršić
Lorena Jemeršić
Jelena PrpićJelena Prpić
Jelena Prpić
Dragan BrnićDragan Brnić
Dragan Brnić
TKTomislav Keros
Tomislav Keros
NPNenad Pandak
Nenad Pandak
OROktavija Đaković Rode
Oktavija Đaković Rode
To fulfill epidemiological data and investigate possible interspecies transmission, this study shall attempt to sequence representative HEV strains of human, swine and wild boar origin collected from 2010 to 2017 in Croatia. In total, 174 anti-HEV antibody positive human sera samples; 1419 blood or faeces samples of swine, as well as 720 tissue and/or blood samples of wild boar originating from different counties (18 in total) in Croatia were tested for the presence of HEV RNA. HEV RNA was detected in 26 human sera samples (14.9%; 95% CI 10.4–21.0%). HEV RNA was detected in 216 tested swine (15.2%; 95% CI 13.5–17.1%), regardless of age, farm breeding system or geographical origin. Viral RNA was also detectable in faeces samples which prove that swine actively participate in shedding HEV into the environment. Of the total of 720 tested wild boar samples, 83 were HEV RNA positive (11.5, 95% CI 9.4–14.1%) originating from six counties. According to the sequence analysis all strains have shown to be members of Orthohepevirus A genotype HEV-3, regardless of host. The genotyping results confirm grouping of sequences into four subtypes of HEV strains of which subtypes 3a and 3c belong to the general cluster 3abchij, and were predominately detected during the study, while subtypes 3e and 3f fall within cluster 3efg. Strains within subtypes 3a and 3e were found in humans, swine and wild boars; subtype 3c strains were derived from humans and swine, whereas subtype 3f strains were found only in humans. Strains belonging to subtypes 3a and 3c were derived during the entire investigated period and may be considered endemic in Croatia, whereas strains within subtypes 3e and 3f were detected sporadically indicating the possibility of newly imported infections. All detected strains show to be genetically highly related to strains found in humans and/or animals from other European Countries, indicating that trade of live animals or wild boar movement increases the risk of HEV infection spread. Furthermore, homologous strains found in different investigated species within this study indicate interspecies transmission of HEV and/or an existence of an accessible mutual source of infection.

14 April 2016 in International Journal of Drug Policy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SHSenad Handanagic
Senad Handanagic
IBIvana Bozicevic
Ivana Bozicevic
MCMarta Civljak
Marta Civljak
ZDZoran Dominkovic
Zoran Dominkovic
SSSandra Sevic
Sandra Sevic
JBJosip Begovac
Josip Begovac

28 December 2022 in Viruses
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NBNikolina Bogdanic
Nikolina Bogdanic
JBJosip Begovac
Josip Begovac
LMLoris Močibob
Loris Močibob
ŠZŠime Zekan
Šime Zekan
IVANA GRGICIVANA GRGIC
IVANA GRGIC
SLSnjezana Zidovec Lepej
Snjezana Zidovec Lepej
The hepatitis A virus (HAV) is a highly hepatotropic virus transmitted mainly via the fecal–oral route. The purpose of this study is to describe a prolonged HAV outbreak in HIV-infected men who have sex with men (MSM) and pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) users in Croatia in 2022. Croatia has a centralized system of HIV care and the PrEP service is only available at the University Hospital for Infectious Diseases (UHID), Zagreb. We reviewed all MSM living with HIV and MSM PrEP users at UHID and identified those diagnosed with HAV between January and October 2022. During this period, a total of 1036 MSM living with HIV and 361 PrEP users were followed, and 45 (4.4%) and 32 (8.9%) were diagnosed with HAV, respectively. Most cases were diagnosed in mid-February. A total of 70.1% (726/1036) MSM living with HIV and 82.3% (297/361) PrEP users were susceptible to HAV. Sequencing information was available for 34 persons; in all cases the HAV subtype IA was found. Our findings indicate that both MSM living with HIV and HIV-uninfected PrEP users are vulnerable to HAV infection and might be a potential source for a more widespread HAV epidemic.

9 July 2014 in European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
OROktavija Đaković Rode
Oktavija Đaković Rode
LJL. Jemeršić
L. Jemeršić
DBD. Brnić
D. Brnić
NPN. Pandak
N. Pandak
RMR. Mikulić
R. Mikulić
AVAdriana Vince
Adriana Vince

4 September 2020 in European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
OROktavija Đaković Rode
Oktavija Đaković Rode
IKIvan-Christian Kurolt
Ivan-Christian Kurolt
IPIvan Puljiz
Ivan Puljiz
Rok ČivljakRok Čivljak
Rok Čivljak
NBNataša Cetinić Balent
Nataša Cetinić Balent
AMAlemka Markotić
Alemka Markotić
According to anti-SARS-CoV-2 seroresponse in patients with COVID-19 from Croatia, we emphasised the issue of different serological tests and need for combining diagnostic methods for COVID-19 diagnosis. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgA and IgG ELISA and IgM/IgG immunochromatographic assay (ICA) were used for testing 60 sera from 21 patients (6 with severe, 10 moderate, and 5 with mild disease). The main clinical, demographic, and haemato-biochemical data were analysed. The most common symptoms were cough (95.2%), fever (90.5%), and fatigue and shortness of breath (42.9%). Pulmonary opacities showed 76.2% of patients. Within the first 7 days of illness, seropositivity for ELISA IgA and IgG was 42.9% and 7.1%, and for ICA IgM and IgG 25% and 10.7%, respectively. From day 8 after onset, ELISA IgA and IgG seropositivity was 90.6% and 68.8%, and for ICA IgM and IgG 84.4% and 75%, respectively. In general, sensitivity for ELISA IgA and IgG was 68.3% and 40%, and for ICA IgM and IgG 56.7% and 45.0%, respectively. The anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody distributions by each method were statistically different (ICA IgM vs. IgG, p = 0.016; ELISA IgG vs. IgA, p < 0.001). Antibody response in COVID-19 varies and depends on the time the serum is taken, on the severity of disease, and on the type of test used. IgM and IgA antibodies as early-stage disease markers are comparable, although they cannot replace each other. Simultaneous IgM/IgG/IgA anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing followed by the confirmation of positive findings with another test in a two-tier testing is recommended.