Page D Dobbs

Dr. Page D Dobbs

Health Behavior and Health Education, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
orcid
Associate Professor

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
5 August 2016 in The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BHBart Hammig
Bart Hammig
Page D DobbsPage D Dobbs
Page D Dobbs
HBHeather Blunt-Vinti
Heather Blunt-Vinti
Background: Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarette) use among youth is a pressing public health issue, with prevalence of use surpassing that of tobacco cigarettes. While research concerning e-cigarettes has proliferated in recent years, there is a dearth of information regarding those whose first exposure to tobacco products was an e-cigarette. Objectives: To examine factors associated with e-cigarette initiation among minority youth in the United States. Methods: Data on minority students in middle and high schools in the United States derived from the 2014 National Youth Tobacco Survey (NYTS) were sampled (weighted N = 27,294,454). We examined e-cigarette initiation among minority youth using logistic regression models to identify related factors. Results: In 2014, 736,158 minority youth were e-cigarette initiators. Odds of e-cigarette initiation was highest among Hispanic youth [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 2.70; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.60–4.56]. Exposure to e-cigarette advertising (AOR = 1.64; 95% CI = 1.07–2.50), perceptions of little to no harm (AOR = 7.08; 95% CI = 4.03–12.46), and believing e-cigarettes were less addictive than tobacco (AOR = 2.15; 95% CI = 1.52–3.02) were associated with e-cigarette initiation. Conclusions: Odds of initiating e-cigarette use was highest among Hispanic youth. Among minority youth, e-cigarette initiation was associated with perceptions of harm and addiction potential, as well as exposure to e-cigarette advertising. Therefore, prevention efforts targeting minority youth who are at risk of becoming e-cigarette initiators may benefit by incorporating these factors into prevention campaigns.

30 July 2020 in Journal of Community Health
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MTMilicen C. Tamayo
Milicen C. Tamayo
Page D DobbsPage D Dobbs
Page D Dobbs
YPYair Pincu
Yair Pincu

1 August 2020 in Addictive Behaviors
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Page D DobbsPage D Dobbs
Page D Dobbs
EHElise J. Hodges
Elise J. Hodges
CDChris M. Dunlap
Chris M. Dunlap
MCMarshall K. Cheney
Marshall K. Cheney

14 October 2019 in Tobacco Control
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Page D DobbsPage D Dobbs
Page D Dobbs
GCGinny Chadwick
Ginny Chadwick
KUKatherine W Ungar
Katherine W Ungar
CDChris M Dunlap
Chris M Dunlap
KWKatherine A White
Katherine A White
MCMarshall K Cheney
Marshall K Cheney
Objective Policies raising the minimum legal sales age (MLSA) of tobacco products to 21 are commonly referred to as tobacco 21. This study sought to identify components of tobacco 21 policies and develop an instrument to examine policy language within 16 state laws adopted by July 2019. Methods The multistage tool development process began with a review of established literature and existing tobacco 21 policies. In a series of meetings, tobacco control experts identified key policy components used to develop an initial tool. After testing and revisions, the instrument was used to code the existing tobacco 21 state-level policies. Inter-rater reliability (κ=0.70) was measured and discrepancies were discussed until consensus was met. Policy component frequencies were reported by state. Results While all 16 states raised the MLSA to 21, the laws varied widely. Two laws omitted purchaser identification requirements. Fifteen laws mentioned enforcement would include inspections, but only three provided justification for conducting inspections. All 16 states provided a penalty structure for retailer/clerk violations, but penalties ranged considerably. Fourteen states required a tobacco retail licence, nine renewed annually. Six laws contained a military exemption, five were phased-in and 10 contained purchase, use or possession laws, which penalised youth. Four states introduced or expanded pre-emption of local tobacco control. Conclusions The instrument developed is the first to examine policy components within state-level tobacco 21 laws. Policies that include negative components or omit positive components may not effectively prevent retailers from selling to youth, which could result in less effective laws.

1 May 2021 in American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Page D DobbsPage D Dobbs
Page D Dobbs
GCGinny Chadwick
Ginny Chadwick
CDChris M. Dunlap
Chris M. Dunlap
KWKatherine A. White
Katherine A. White
MCMarshall K. Cheney
Marshall K. Cheney

15 November 2020 in Maternal and Child Health Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Page D DobbsPage D Dobbs
Page D Dobbs
YLYu Lu
Yu Lu
SMSarah Maness
Sarah Maness
LCLois Coleman
Lois Coleman
AJAleyah Johnson
Aleyah Johnson
MCMarshall K. Cheney
Marshall K. Cheney