A vast amount of location information exists in unstructured texts, such as social media posts, news stories, scientific articles, web pages, travel blogs, and historical archives. Geoparsing refers to recognizing location references from texts and identifying their geospatial representations. While geoparsing can benefit many domains, a summary of its specific applications is still missing. Further, there is a lack of a comprehensive review and comparison of existing approaches for location reference recognition, which is the first and core step of geoparsing. To fill these research gaps, this review first summarizes seven typical application domains of geoparsing: geographic information retrieval, disaster management, disease surveillance, traffic management, spatial humanities, tourism management, and crime management. We then review existing approaches for location reference recognition by categorizing these approaches into four groups based on their underlying functional principle: rule-based, gazetteer matching–based, statistical learning-–based, and hybrid approaches. Next, we thoroughly evaluate the correctness and computational efficiency of the 27 most widely used approaches for location reference recognition based on 26 public datasets with different types of texts (e.g., social media posts and news stories) containing 39,736 location references worldwide. Results from this thorough evaluation can help inform future methodological developments and can help guide the selection of proper approaches based on application needs.

As it is widely accepted, cycling tends to produce health benefits and reduce air pollution. Policymakers encourage people to use bikes by improving cycling facilities as well as developing bicycle-sharing systems (BSS). It is increasingly interesting to investigate how environmental factors influence the cycling behavior of users of bicycle-sharing systems, as users of bicycle-sharing systems tend to be different from regular cyclists. Although earlier studies have examined effects of safety and convenience on the cycling behavior of regular riders, they rarely explored effects of safety and convenience on the cycling behavior of BSS riders. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to investigate how road safety, convenience, and public safety affect the cycling behavior of BSS riders by controlling for other environmental factors. Specifically, in this study, we investigated the impacts of environmental characteristics, including population density, employment density, land use mix, accessibility to point-of-interests (schools, shops, parks and gyms), road infrastructure, public transit accessibility, road safety, convenience, and public safety on the usage of BSS. Additionally, for a more accurate measure of public transit accessibility, road safety, convenience, and public safety, we used spatiotemporally varying measurements instead of spatially varying measurements, which have been widely used in earlier studies. We conducted an empirical investigation in Chicago with cycling data from a BSS called Divvy. In this study, we particularly attempted to answer the following questions: (1) how traffic accidents and congestion influence the usage of BSS; (2) how violent crime influences the usage of BSS; and (3) how public transit accessibility influences the usage of BSS. Moreover, we tried to offer implications for policies aiming to increase the usage of BSS or for the site selection of new docking stations. Empirical results demonstrate that density of bicycle lanes, public transit accessibility, and public safety influence the usage of BSS, which provides answers for our research questions. Empirical results also suggest policy implications that improving bicycle facilities and reducing the rate of violent crime rates tend to increase the usage of BSS. Moreover, some environmental factors could be considered in selecting a site for a new docking station.

Extracting precise location information from microblogs is a crucial task in many applications, particularly in disaster response, revealing where damages are, where people need assistance, and where help can be found. A crucial prerequisite to location extraction is place name extraction. In this paper, we present GazPNE: a hybrid approach to place name extraction which fuses rules, gazetteers, and deep learning techniques without requiring any manually annotated data. The core of the approach is to learn the intrinsic characteristics of multi-word place names with deep learning from gazetteers. Specifically, GazPNE consists of a rule-based system to select n-grams from the microblogs that potentially contain place names, and a C-LSTM model that decides if the selected n-gram is a place name or not. The C-LSTM is trained on 388.1 million examples containing 6.8 million positive examples with US and Indian place names extracted from OpenStreetMap and 381.3 million negative examples synthesized by rules. We evaluate GazPNE against the SoTA on a manually annotated 4,500 tweet dataset which contains 9,026 place names from three foods: 2016 in Louisiana (US), 2016 in Houston (US), and 2015 in Chennai (India). GazPNE achieves SotA performance on the test data with an F1 of 0.84.

The concept of “human as sensors” defines a new sensing model, in which humans act as sensors by contributing their observations, perceptions, and sensations. This is crucial for the development of Social Internet of Things, which is an integral part of cyber-physical–social systems. Online social media platforms, as the most active places where users act as social sensors, are responsive to real-world events and are useful for gathering situational information in real time. Unfortunately, posts rarely contain structured geographic information, thus hindering their usage for contributing to various challenges, such as emergency response. We address this limitation by introducing a general approach for extracting place names from tweets, named GazPNE2. It combines global gazetteers (i.e., OpenStreetMap and GeoNames), deep learning, and pretrained transformer models (i.e., BERT and BERTweet), which requires no manually annotated data. It can extract place names at both coarse (e.g., city) and fine-grained (e.g., street and POI) levels and place names with abbreviations. To fully evaluate GazPNE2 and compare it with 11 competing approaches, we use 19 public tweet data sets, containing 38 802 tweets and 22 197 places across the world. The results show GazPNE2 achieves a much higher F1 (0.8) than the other approaches. Furthermore, we apply GazPNE2 to three large unannotated tweet data sets related to over 20 crisis events (e.g., coronavirus disease 2019), containing 560 040 tweets. An F1 of 0.84 is achieved on 3000 tweets, which are randomly selected from the three data sets and then manually annotated. Code and data are available on GitHub page: https://github.com/uhuohuy/GazPNE2.