Marie Von Lilienfeld-Toal

Prof. Dr. Marie Von Lilienfeld-Toal


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
21 March 2022 in Blood Cancer Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Joan BladéJoan Bladé
Joan Bladé
MBMeral Beksac
Meral Beksac
JCJo Caers
Jo Caers
Artur JurczyszynArtur Jurczyszyn
Artur Jurczyszyn
MLMarie Von Lilienfeld-Toal
Marie Von Lilienfeld-Toal
Paul G. RichardsonPaul G. Richardson
Paul G. Richardson
Extramedullary involvement (or extramedullary disease, EMD) represents an aggressive form of multiple myeloma (MM), characterized by the ability of a clone and/or subclone to thrive and grow independent of the bone marrow microenvironment. Several different definitions of EMD have been used in the published literature. We advocate that true EMD is restricted to soft-tissue plasmacytomas that arise due to hematogenous spread and have no contact with bony structures. Typical sites of EMD vary according to the phase of MM. At diagnosis, EMD is typically found in skin and soft tissues; at relapse, typical sites involved include liver, kidneys, lymph nodes, central nervous system (CNS), breast, pleura, and pericardium. The reported incidence of EMD varies considerably, and differences in diagnostic approach between studies are likely to contribute to this variability. In patients with newly diagnosed MM, the reported incidence ranges from 0.5% to 4.8%, while in relapsed/refractory MM the reported incidence is 3.4 to 14%. Available data demonstrate that the prognosis is poor, and considerably worse than for MM without soft-tissue plasmacytomas. Among patients with plasmacytomas, those with EMD have poorer outcomes than those with paraskeletal involvement. CNS involvement is rare, but prognosis is even more dismal than for EMD in other locations, particularly if there is leptomeningeal involvement. Available data on treatment outcomes for EMD are derived almost entirely from retrospective studies. Some agents and combinations have shown a degree of efficacy but, as would be expected, this is less than in MM patients with no extramedullary involvement. The paucity of prospective studies makes it difficult to justify strong recommendations for any treatment approach. Prospective data from patients with clearly defined EMD are important for the optimal evaluation of treatment outcomes.

11 March 2022 in Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AFAnnika Fendler
Annika Fendler
GVGrietje Knol-de Vries
Grietje Knol-de Vries
CGCorine H. GeurtsvanKessel
Corine H. GeurtsvanKessel
JHJohn B. Haanen
John B. Haanen
BWBernhard Wörmann
Bernhard Wörmann
MLMarie Von Lilienfeld-Toal
Marie Von Lilienfeld-Toal
Patients with cancer have a higher risk of severe coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and associated mortality than the general population. Owing to this increased risk, patients with cancer have been prioritized for COVID-19 vaccination globally, for both primary and booster vaccinations. However, given that these patients were not included in the pivotal clinical trials, considerable uncertainty remains regarding vaccine efficacy, and the extent of humoral and cellular immune responses in these patients, as well as the risks of vaccine-related adverse events. In this Review, we summarize the current knowledge generated in studies conducted since COVID-19 vaccines first became available. We also highlight critical points that might affect vaccine efficacy in patients with cancer in the future.


1 November 2016 in European Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MLMarie Von Lilienfeld-Toal
Marie Von Lilienfeld-Toal
ABAnnemarie Berger
Annemarie Berger
MCMaximilian Christopeit
Maximilian Christopeit
MHMarcus Hentrich
Marcus Hentrich
CHClaus Peter Heussel
Claus Peter Heussel
KMKarin Mayer
Karin Mayer
Community acquired viruses (CRVs) may cause severe disease in cancer patients. Thus, efforts should be made to diagnose CRV rapidly and manage CRV infections accordingly. A panel of 18 clinicians from the Infectious Diseases Working Party of the German Society for Haematology and Medical Oncology have convened to assess the available literature and provide recommendations on the management of CRV infections including influenza, respiratory syncytial virus, parainfluenza virus, human metapneumovirus and adenovirus. CRV infections in cancer patients may lead to pneumonia in approximately 30% of the cases, with an associated mortality of around 25%. For diagnosis of a CRV infection, combined nasal/throat swabs or washes/aspirates give the best results and nucleic acid amplification based-techniques (NAT) should be used to detect the pathogen. Hand hygiene, contact isolation and face masks have been shown to be of benefit as general infection management. Causal treatment can be given for influenza, using a neuraminidase inhibitor, and respiratory syncytial virus, using ribavirin in addition to intravenous immunoglobulins. Ribavirin has also been used to treat parainfluenza virus and human metapneumovirus, but data are inconclusive in this setting. Cidofovir is used to treat adenovirus pneumonitis. CRV infections may pose a vital threat to patients with underlying malignancy. This guideline provides information on diagnosis and treatment to improve the outcome.

24 January 2019 in Annals of Hematology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ABAnnamaria Brioli
Annamaria Brioli
MKMaximilian Klaus
Maximilian Klaus
HSHerbert Sayer
Herbert Sayer
SSSebastian Scholl
Sebastian Scholl
TEThomas Ernst
Thomas Ernst
MLMarie Von Lilienfeld-Toal
Marie Von Lilienfeld-Toal

1 May 2020 in Leukemia
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EGEHA Infectious Disease Scientific Working Group
EHA Infectious Disease Scientific Working Group
MLMarie Von Lilienfeld-Toal
Marie Von Lilienfeld-Toal
JVJörg Janne Vehreschild
Jörg Janne Vehreschild
OCOliver Cornely
Oliver Cornely
LPLivio Pagano
Livio Pagano
HHHans H. Hirsch
Hans H. Hirsch
Since early 2020, the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has a massive impact on health care systems worldwide. Patients with malignant diseases are assumed to be at increased risk for a worse outcome of SARS-CoV-2 infection, and therefore, guidance regarding prevention and management of the infection as well as safe administration of cancer-therapy is required. Here, we provide recommendations for the management of patients with malignant disease in the times of COVID-19. These recommendations were prepared by an international panel of experts and then consented by the EHA Scientific Working Group on Infection in Hematology. The primary aim is to enable clinicians to provide optimal cancer care as safely as possible, since the most important protection for patients with malignant disease is the best-possible control of the underlying disease.