Rhabdomyosarcomas (RMSs) are the most common soft tissue sarcomas in children/adolescents less than 18 years of age with an annual incidence of 1-2/million. Inter/intra-tumour heterogeneity raise challenges in clinical, pathological and biological research studies. Risk stratification in European and North American clinical trials previously relied on clinico-pathological features, but now, incorporates PAX3/7-FOXO1-fusion gene status in the place of alveolar histology. International working groups propose a coordinated approach through the INternational Soft Tissue SaRcoma ConsorTium to evaluate the specific genetic abnormalities and generate and integrate molecular and clinical data related to patients with RMS across different trial settings. We review relevant data and present a consensus view on what molecular features should be assessed. In particular, we recommend the assessment of the MYOD1-LR122R mutation for risk escalation, as it has been associated with poor outcomes in spindle/sclerosing RMS and rare RMS with classic embryonal histopathology. The prospective analyses of rare fusion genes beyond PAX3/7-FOXO1 will generate new data linked to outcomes and assessment of TP53 mutations and CDK4 amplification may confirm their prognostic value. Pathogenic/likely pathogenic germline variants in TP53 and other cancer predisposition genes should also be assessed. DNA/RNA profiling of tumours at diagnosis/relapse and serial analyses of plasma samples is recommended where possible to validate potential molecular biomarkers, identify new biomarkers and assess how liquid biopsy analyses can have the greatest benefit. Together with the development of new molecularly-derived therapeutic strategies that we review, a synchronised international approach is expected to enhance progress towards improved treatment assignment, management and outcomes for patients with RMS.

Background: To evaluate optimal therapy and potential risk factors.Methods: Data of DSRCT patients <40 years treated in prospective CWS trials 1997‐2015 were analyzed.Results: Median age of 60 patients was 14.5 years. Male:female ratio was 4:1. Tumors were abdominal/retroperitoneal in 56/60 (93%). 6/60 (10%) presented with a localized mass, 16/60 (27%) regionally disseminated nodes, and 38/60 (63%) with extraperitoneal metastases. At diagnosis, 23/60 (38%) patients had effusions, 4/60 (7%) a thrombosis, and 37/54 (69%) elevated CRP. 40/60 (67%) patients underwent tumor resection, 21/60 (35%) macroscopically complete. 37/60 (62%) received chemotherapy according to CEVAIE (ifosfamide, vincristine, actinomycin D, carboplatin, epirubicin, etoposide), 15/60 (25%) VAIA (ifosfamide, vincristine, adriamycin, actinomycin D) and, 5/60 (8%) P6 (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, ifosfamide, etoposide). Nine received high‐dose chemotherapy, 6 received regional hyperthermia, and 20 received radiotherapy. Among 25 patients achieving complete remission, 18 (72%) received metronomic therapies. Three‐year event‐free (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were 11% (±8 confidence interval [CI] 95%) and 30% (±12 CI 95%), respectively, for all patients and 26.7% (±18.0 CI 95%) and 56.9% (±20.4 CI 95%) for 25 patients achieving remission. Extra‐abdominal site, localized disease, no effusion or ascites only, absence of thrombosis, normal CRP, complete tumor resection, and chemotherapy with VAIA correlated with EFS in univariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, significant factors were no thrombosis and chemotherapy with VAIA. In patients achieving complete remission, metronomic therapy with cyclophosphamide/vinblastine correlated with prolonged time to relapse.Conclusion: Pleural effusions, venous thrombosis, and CRP elevation were identified as potential risk factors. The VAIA scheme showed best outcome. Maintenance therapy should be investigated further.

In this article, we will discuss the genesis, evolution, and progress of the INternational Soft Tissue SaRcoma ConsorTium (INSTRuCT), which aims to foster international research and collaboration focused on pediatric soft tissue sarcoma. We will begin by highlighting the current state of clinical research for pediatric soft tissue sarcomas, including rhabdomyosarcoma and non‐rhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcoma. We will then explore challenges and research priorities, describe the development of INSTRuCT, and discuss how the consortium aims to address key research priorities.

We report here the results of the prospective, non-randomized, historically controlled CWS-2002P study in patients ≤ 21 years with localized RMS developed with the aim to improve the long-term outcome by adapting the burden of therapy to risk profile and to investigate the feasibility and relation to the outcome of maintenance therapy (MT) in the high-risk groups. Patients were allocated into low-risk (LR), standard-risk (SR), high-risk (HR), and very high-risk (VHR) groups. Chemotherapy consisted of vincristine (VCR) and dactinomycin (ACTO-D) for all patients with the addition of ifosfamide (IFO) in the SR, HR, and VHR and doxorubicin (DOX) in the HR and VHR groups. Low-dose cyclophosphamide and vinblastine maintenance therapy (MT) over 6 months was recommended in the HR and VHR groups. A total of 444 patients have been included in this analysis. With a median follow-up of 9·6 years (IQR 7·6–10·9) for patients alive, the 5-year EFS and OS for the whole group was 73% (95% CI 69–77) and 80% (95% CI 76–84), respectively. The 5-year EFS by risk group was 100% in the LR, 79% (95% CI 72–84) in the SR, 69% (95% CI 63–75) in the HR, and 42% (95% CI 23–61) in the VHR (log-rank p = 0.000). The 5-year EFS was 77% (95% CI 70–84) for 155 patients in the HR group who received MT as compared to 63% (95% CI 50–76) for 49 patients who did not (log-rank p = 0.015). Neither the reduction in the IFO dose in the SR nor the increased dose intensity of DOX in HR groups influenced the outcome when compared to the previous CWS and other European studies. MT was feasible, seemed to have an impact on prognosis, and should be studied in a well-controlled prospective trial in this patient population. The weighting of risk factors used for therapy stratification needs to be reevaluated.