Yanhong Sun

Yanhong Sun


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

5Years (2022-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
8 October 2025 in Buildings
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YLYuehong Lu
Yuehong Lu
YZYang Zhang
Yang Zhang
ZHZhijia Huang
Zhijia Huang
BCBo Cheng
Bo Cheng
CWChanglong Wang
Changlong Wang
JLJiao Li
Jiao Li
This study presents a novel integrative review of 329 review articles on sustainable buildings from 2015 to 2025, combining quantitative bibliometrics with qualitative insights to map the field’s evolution and pinpoint critical future pathways. Seven core research themes were identified in this study: (1) material and advanced construction technologies, (2) energy efficiency and renewable energy systems, (3) digitalization and smart technologies, (4) policy, standards, and certification, (5) sustainable design and optimization, (6) stakeholder and socio-economic factors, (7) other (cross-cutting) topics. Key findings reveal a surge in publications post-2020, driven by global net-zero commitments, with China, Australia, and Hong Kong leading research output. Innovations in low-carbon materials (e.g., hemp concrete, geopolymers), artificial intelligent (AI)-driven energy optimization, and digital tools (e.g., building information modeling (BIM), internet of things (IoT)) dominate recent advancements. However, challenges persist, including policy fragmentation, scalability barriers for sustainable materials, and socio-economic disparities in green building adoption. The study proposes a unique future research framework emphasizing nanotechnology-enhanced materials, interpretable AI models, harmonized global standards, and inclusive stakeholder engagement. This review provides actionable recommendations to bridge gaps between technological innovation, policy frameworks, and practical implementation in sustainable construction.

11 February 2022 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CWChanglong Wang
Changlong Wang
HFHan Fang
Han Fang
XWXin Wang
Xin Wang
JLJinli Lu
Jinli Lu
YSYanhong Sun
Yanhong Sun
Based on a semi-analytical model established previously for heat transfer in coaxial borehole heat exchangers, the influences of the heat capacities of different parts of the borehole (fluid, pipes and grout) on the performance of deep coaxial borehole heat exchanger (DCBHE) are analyzed. The results are as follows: the heat transfer performance of DCBHE will be underestimated if the heat capacities of different parts of the borehole are ignored; the influences of the heat capacities of different parts of the borehole on the performance of DCBHE are more obvious in the early stage, and gradually weaken with the increasing of time; among the heat capacities of different parts of the borehole, the influence of the fluid heat capacity on the performance of DCBHE is the greatest, and the influence of the pipe heat capacities is the least. Under the working condition studied in this paper, the results obtained with considering the heat capacities of different parts of the borehole are compared to ones ignoring heat capacities of selected elements. It was found that ignoring the fluid heat capacity led to a 0.29 °C lower estimated outlet fluid temperature after 60 h. Omitting the heat capacities of pipes and grout gave 0.03 °C and 0.13 °C lower outlet fluid temperatures after 60 h, respectively. The larger the borehole radius, the greater the influence of borehole heat capacity. The geothermal gradient has little effect on the influence of borehole heat capacity on the performance of DCBHE. The results show that the heat capacities of different parts of the borehole have important effects on the performance of DCBHE, especially in the early stage and for a large borehole radius.

8 March 2022 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TLTao Lv
Tao Lv
YLYuehong Lu
Yuehong Lu
YZYijie Zhou
Yijie Zhou
XLXuemei Liu
Xuemei Liu
CWChanglong Wang
Changlong Wang
YSYanhong Sun
Yanhong Sun
Net-zero energy buildings coupled with multiple energy demands on the load side, which utilize renewable energy to a larger extent, are an effective way to consume distributed capacity in situ and need to face the operational challenges brought by the uncertainty of renewable energy while meeting different energy demands. To this end, this paper proposes a Dynamic Cost Interaction Optimization Model (DCI-OM) with Electric Vehicle Charging Station (EVCS) based on dynamic cost (i.e., oil price, electricity price) and considers a larger proportion of renewable energy capacity to be consumed. In this model, the optimized electricity and cooling demand dispatch scheme is given with daily operating cost as the objective function. Using the Zero Carbon Building in Hong Kong, China, as an example, simulations are performed for typical days (i.e., 21 March, 21 June, 22 September, and 21 December) in four seasons throughout the year. The results show that the electric and cooling load demand response scheme given by DCI-OM achieves peak and valley reduction according to the dynamic cost and reduces the original operating costs while ensuring that the customer’s comfort needs are within acceptable limits. The optimized scheduling scheme meets the demand while reducing the daily operating cost.

13 September 2023 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CWChanglong Wang
Changlong Wang
QFQiang Fu
Qiang Fu
WSWanyu Sun
Wanyu Sun
JLJinli Lu
Jinli Lu
YSYanhong Sun
Yanhong Sun
WLWanwan Li
Wanwan Li
A ground heat exchanger (GHE) can efficiently exploit geothermal energy, and a ground source heat pump (GSHP) is an important type of geothermal application. The distributed thermal response test (DTRT) is widely used to measure layered ground thermal properties for shallow GHEs, but nowadays, there is a lack of studies applying the DTRT to deep coaxial GHEs (DCGHEs). This study proposes a new parameter estimation method (PEM) by adopting the DTRT data of a DCGHE to estimate layered ground thermal properties and applies the proposed PEM to simulated DTRTs under different boundary conditions, and the estimated values of the layered ground thermal properties are compared with the true values. Under heat output rate or inlet temperature boundary conditions, the relative errors of the thermal conductivities and heat capacities of ground estimated using the proposed PEM are basically within 2% and 4%, respectively, except for shallower layers with a depth range of 0–800 m. The larger errors for shallower layers may be caused by weaker heat transfer between the fluid and ground, and the errors are basically lower for higher heat output rates. The predicted fluid temperature distributions during 120 d using the estimated values of the layered ground thermal properties match well with those using the true values. The results show that the proposed PEM is viable for DCGHE DTRT interpretation under heat output rate and inlet temperature boundary conditions, is a cost-effective way to establish key parameters for GSHP design, and would promote geothermal development.

1 June 2026 in Buildings
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YLYuehong Lu
Yuehong Lu
HZHao Zhang
Hao Zhang
ZSZhipeng Song
Zhipeng Song
HJHaixia Ji
Haixia Ji
DWDong Wang
Dong Wang
YSYanhong Sun
Yanhong Sun
This study presents a bibliometric and systematic review of 480 articles meeting the following inclusion criteria: English-language articles, reviews, or proceeding papers focusing on building topics with full text available, retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection on 9 Jannary 2026 to map the intellectual landscape of smart-sustainable building (SSB) research. Employing the PRISMA framework combined with scientometric mapping (VOSviewer), thematic classification, and qualitative synthesis (no risk of bias assessment was performed as this was a bibliometric review), the analysis reveals exponential publication growth since 2022, identifying three dominant thematic clusters: digital enabling technologies (41.0%), energy systems (30.8%), and advanced building envelopes and materials (28.3%). Keyword analysis identifies “smart buildings,” “green buildings,” and “energy efficiency” as central conceptual anchors, while temporal trends indicate increasing attention to artificial intelligence, digital twins, and blockchain. Notably, 51.4% of articles address two or more themes simultaneously, confirming the field’s interdisciplinary character. Critical analysis reveals persistent fragmentation: sustainable building rating tools (e.g., BREEAM, LEED) and smart building evaluation methods (e.g., Smart Readiness Indicator). Seven challenges, including assessment fragmentation, high costs, and cybersecurity vulnerabilities, are identified as barriers to SSB adoption. Limitations include reliance on a single database (Web of Science) and subjective thematic classification. This review provides a roadmap for future research emphasizing integrated assessment frameworks and interdisciplinary collaboration. Registration: Not pre-registered. Funding: National Key R&D Program of China (2025YFF0521003).