Background: Risk stratification plays an essential role in the management of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). The current European guidelines propose a three-stratum model to categorise risk as low, intermediate or high, based on the expected 1-year mortality. However, with this model, most patients are categorised as intermediate risk. We investigated a modified approach based on four risk categories, with intermediate risk subdivided into intermediate-low and intermediate-high risk.Methods: We analysed data from the Comparative, Prospective Registry of Newly Initiated Therapies for Pulmonary Hypertension (COMPERA), a European pulmonary hypertension registry, and calculated risk at diagnosis and first follow-up based on World Health Organization functional class, 6-min walk distance (6MWD) and serum levels of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) or N-terminal pro-BNP (NT-proBNP), using refined cut-off values. Survival was assessed using Kaplan–Meier analyses, log-rank testing and Cox proportional hazards models.Results: Data from 1655 patients with PAH were analysed. Using the three-stratum model, most patients were classified as intermediate risk (76.0% at baseline and 63.9% at first follow-up). The refined four-stratum risk model yielded a more nuanced separation and predicted long-term survival, especially at follow-up assessment. Changes in risk from baseline to follow-up were observed in 31.1% of the patients with the three-stratum model and in 49.2% with the four-stratum model. These changes, including those between the intermediate-low and intermediate-high strata, were associated with changes in long-term mortality risk.Conclusions: Modified risk stratification using a four-stratum model based on refined cut-off levels for functional class, 6MWD and BNP/NT-proBNP was more sensitive to prognostically relevant changes in risk than the original three-stratum model.

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a severe, progressive disease. Although 5 PH subgroups are recognized, reports on survival have focused mainly on pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Long-term transplant-free survival and its determinants were investigated in patients with PH (diagnosed by right heart catheterization) within a prospective registry at a single referral center in Giessen, Germany. In total, 2,067 patients were enrolled (PAH, 685 patients [33.1%]; pulmonary venous hypertension, 307 patients [14.9%]; PH due to lung diseases (LD-PH), 546 patients [26.4%; mainly interstitial lung disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease]; chronic thromboembolic PH, 459 patients [22.2%]; PH owing to miscellaneous/unknown causes, 70 patients [3.4%]). Median follow-up was 37 months. Differences in transplant-free survival between etiologic groups were highly significant (p < 0.001), with 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates of 88.2%, 72.2% and 59.4%, respectively, for those with PAH compared with 79.5%, 52.7% and 38.1%, respectively, for patients with LD-PH. Patients' age, gender and 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), but not New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, associated significantly with survival across all PH subtypes in multivariate Cox regression analyses. This is the largest single-center PH cohort described so far. Some parameters used in clinical practice do not independently predict survival. Age, gender and 6MWD outperformed NYHA functional class in predicting survival across all etiologic groups.

Background: Since 2015, the European pulmonary hypertension guidelines recommend the use of combination therapy in most patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). However, it is unclear to what extent this treatment strategy is adopted in clinical practice and if it is associated with improved long-term survival.Methods: We analysed data from COMPERA, a large European pulmonary hypertension registry, to assess temporal trends in the use of combination therapy and survival of patients with newly diagnosed PAH between 2010 and 2019. For survival analyses, we looked at annualised data and at cumulated data comparing the periods 2010–2014 and 2015–2019.Results: A total of 2531 patients were included. The use of early combination therapy (within 3 months after diagnosis) increased from 10.0% in patients diagnosed with PAH in 2010 to 25.0% in patients diagnosed with PAH in 2019. The proportion of patients receiving combination therapy 1 year after diagnosis increased from 27.7% to 46.3%. When comparing the 2010–2014 and 2015–2019 periods, 1-year survival estimates were similar (89.0% (95% CI 87.2–90.9%) and 90.8% (95% CI 89.3–92.4%), respectively), whereas there was a slight but nonsignificant improvement in 3-year survival estimates (67.8% (95% CI 65.0–70.8%) and 70.5% (95% CI 67.8–73.4%), respectively).Conclusions: The use of combination therapy increased from 2010 to 2019, but most patients still received monotherapy. Survival rates at 1 year after diagnosis did not change over time. Future studies need to determine if the observed trend suggesting improved 3-year survival rates can be confirmed.

Recently, criteria for evaluation of response to biologics have been proposed and the concept of clinical remission has gained attention as possible goal even in severe asthma. To analyze the response and remission in the GAN severe asthma registry cohort. We included adults not using a biologic at baseline (V0) and compared patients treated between V0 and 1-year-visit (V1) without using a biologic (group A) to patients starting with a biologic after V0 and continuing it up V1 (group B). We applied the Biologics Asthma Response Score (BARS) to quantify composite response in good, intermediate or insufficient. We defined clinical remission (R) as absence of significant symptoms (ACT≥20 at V1) in the absence of exacerbations and OCS therapy. Group A included 233 and group B 210 patients, the latter receiving omalizumab (n=33), mepolizumab (n=40), benralizumab (n=81), reslizumab (n=1) or dupilumab (n=56). At baseline group B had less often an allergic phenotype (35.2% vs 41.6%), lower ACT (median 12 vs 14), more exacerbations in the past year (median: 3 vs 2), and more often high-dose ICS treatment (71.4% vs 51.5%) than group A. After 1 year of treatment, rates of response (good 61.4% vs. 34.8%; intermediate: 26.7% vs 42.9%; insufficient: 11.9% vs. 22.3%) and/or clinical remission (37.6% vs. 17.2%) were higher in group B than in group A. Despite more severe asthma at baseline, patients treated with biologics had a markedly higher probability of achieving good clinical response and/or remission than patients treated without biologics.

A diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH) is frequently made in elderly patients who present with comorbidities, especially hypertension, coronary heart disease, diabetes mellitus, and obesity. It is unknown to what extent the presence of these comorbidities affects the response to PAH therapies and whether risk stratification predicts outcome in patients with comorbidities. We assessed the database of COMPERA, a European pulmonary hypertension registry, to determine changes after initiation of PAH therapy in WHO functional class (FC), 6-minute walking distance (6MWD), brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) or N-terminal fragment of probrain natriuretic peptide (NT-pro-BNP), and mortality risk assessed by a 4-strata model in patients with IPAH and no comorbidities, 1-2 comorbidities and 3-4 comorbidities. The analysis was based on 1,120 IPAH patients (n = 208 [19%] without comorbidities, n = 641 [57%] with 1-2 comorbidities, and n = 271 [24%] with 3-4 comorbidities). Improvements in FC, 6MWD, BNP/NT-pro-BNP, and mortality risk from baseline to first follow-up were significantly larger in patients with no comorbidities than in patients with comorbidities, while they were not significantly different in patients with 1-2 and 3-4 comorbidities. The 4-strata risk tool predicted survival in patients without comorbidities as well as in patients with 1-2 or 3-4 comorbidities. Our data suggest that patients with IPAH and comorbidities benefit from PAH medication with improvements in FC, 6MWD, BNP/NT-pro-BNP, and mortality risk, albeit to a lesser extent than patients without comorbidities. The 4-strata risk tool predicted outcome in patients with IPAH irrespective of the presence of comorbidities.