María De Andrés-Herrero

Mrs. María De Andrés-Herrero


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DBDaniel Becker
Daniel Becker
MAMaría De Andrés-Herrero
María De Andrés-Herrero
CWChristian Willmes
Christian Willmes
GWGerd-Christian Weniger
Gerd-Christian Weniger
GBGeorg Bareth
Georg Bareth
The overall objective of this work is to apply GIS-based cost distance modeling (CDM) to site catchment modeling and analysis of prehistoric (Solutrean) sites in Andalusia. The implementation of a GIS-method for slope-based CDM was explained in detail, so that it can be replicated easily in future studies. Additional cost components, vegetation and stream networks, were included in the method. The presented CDM approach uses slope rasters as input data, which were derived from digital elevation models (DEMs). Various DEMs that differ in cell size, accuracy and other characteristics can be applied to this method. Thus, a major goal of this work is to investigate the influence different publicly available DEMs (SRTM, ASTER GDEM, EU-DEM, official 5-m/10-m cell size DEMs) have on the results of GIS-based CDM. While the investigation was conducted on sites from different chronocultural periods, a case study was performed on Solutrean sites in order to test the CDM approach by producing actual results and then comparing and interpreting them from an archaeological perspective. The results of the DEM evaluation with resampled horizontal resolutions show a clear influence of the DEM cell size on the modeled catchment area sizes. The investigation also indicates that this influence can be superimposed by other factors, such as noise and residuals of filtered anthropogenic features, when using DEMs of different origins.

1 May 2019 in Quaternary International
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
José YravedraJosé Yravedra
José Yravedra
Miguel Ángel Maté-GonzálezMiguel Ángel Maté-González
Miguel Ángel Maté-González
Lloyd A. CourtenayLloyd A. Courtenay
Lloyd A. Courtenay
PLPablo López-Cisneros
Pablo López-Cisneros
VEVerónica Estaca-Gómez
Verónica Estaca-Gómez
David Álvarez-AlonsoDavid Álvarez-Alonso
David Álvarez-Alonso

1 April 2018 in Quaternary International
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
David Álvarez-AlonsoDavid Álvarez-Alonso
David Álvarez-Alonso
MAMaría De Andrés-Herrero
María De Andrés-Herrero
Andres Diez-HerreroAndres Diez-Herrero
Andres Diez-Herrero
AMAlicia Medialdea
Alicia Medialdea
JRJulio Rojo-Hernández
Julio Rojo-Hernández

2 May 2018 in Quaternary Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MKMartin Kehl
Martin Kehl
David Álvarez-AlonsoDavid Álvarez-Alonso
David Álvarez-Alonso
MAMaría De Andrés-Herrero
María De Andrés-Herrero
ADAndrés Díez-Herrero
Andrés Díez-Herrero
NKNicole Klasen
Nicole Klasen
GWGerd-Christian Weniger
Gerd-Christian Weniger
The timing of the late Middle Paleolithic and late disappearance of Neanderthals in the Iberian Peninsula are hotly debated subjects in Paleolithic archeology. Several studies suggested a late survival in South and Central Iberia until about 32 ka, but were probably subject to significant age underestimation due to contamination of dating samples, undiagnostic lithic assemblages, and/or lack of stratigraphic integrity. We conducted a radiocarbon and luminescence-dating study backed by detailed sedimentological and micromorphological investigations at the newly discovered rock shelter sequence of Abrigo del Molino (Central Spain). Accumulation of the sediment sequence was rapid. It started with deposition of paleoflood slack-water deposits at around 48 ka and continued until about 41 ka with deposition of colluvial and detrital sediments. These contain two Mousterian levels, which place the latest Neanderthal occupation at around 45 to 41 ka, i.e., between Heinrich Stadials 5 and 4, and probably during a time of climate amelioration. Abrigo del Molino thus provides a detailed and chronologically well-constrained record of Late Neanderthal presence and morphodynamic change in Central Iberia during times of millennial-scale climate changes. The site gives further evidence for an early disappearance of Neanderthals in Central Iberia.

1 April 2018 in Quaternary International
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MMMario Menéndez
Mario Menéndez
David Álvarez-AlonsoDavid Álvarez-Alonso
David Álvarez-Alonso
MAMaría De Andrés-Herrero
María De Andrés-Herrero
PCPilar Carral
Pilar Carral
EGEduardo García-Sánchez
Eduardo García-Sánchez
JRJulio Rojo
Julio Rojo

30 June 2018 in BOLETÍN GEOLÓGICO Y MINERO
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MKM. Kehl
M. Kehl
David Álvarez-AlonsoDavid Álvarez-Alonso
David Álvarez-Alonso
MAMaría De Andrés-Herrero
María De Andrés-Herrero
PGP. Carral González
P. Carral González
EGE. García
E. García
GWGerd-Christian Weniger
Gerd-Christian Weniger
The archaeological sequence of the Palaeolithic site of La Güelga apparently shows an interstratification of Aurignacian between the Mousterian and Châtelperronian layers, a sequence which disagrees with the stratigraphic model for the Middle to Upper Palaeolithic transition in SW-Europe. We analyzed the witness section of the interior sector in archaeological zone D using micromorphology and collected new radiocarbon dates for the Aurignacian and presumably Châtelperronian levels in order to provide detailed sediment descriptions of the site and scrutinize the presumed interstratification. Thin sections from Mousterian levels 8 and 9 show microstratification, signs of trampling and preferential sub-horizontal orientation of elongated particles. These features are less strongly developed in the Aurignacian deposit of levels 5 and 6 and are lacking in the presumably Châtelperronian ones of levels 1 and 2. The deposits of the latter show other features of reworked slope deposits such as a randomized distribution of limestone clasts. Radiocarbon dating on bone samples from level 2 places this layer to between ~41.5 and 45 ka cal BP, hence older than Aurignacian level 5, dated to between ~35.5 and 41.5 ka cal BP. Comparative dating of bones with and without ultrafiltration pretreatment conducted in two different laboratories yielded results in excellent agreement. Overall, the micromorphological observations and new radiocarbon ages strongly suggest that the few finds of presumably Châtelperronian affinity and sediments of levels 1 and 2 were transported by slope processes into the shelter.