Alessandro Audisio

Dr. Alessandro Audisio

University of Turin - department of Oncology - Hospital San Luigi Orbassano
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

5Years (2022-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
25 February 2022 in Cells
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AUAntonio Ungaro
Antonio Ungaro
MTMarcello Tucci
Marcello Tucci
AAAlessandro Audisio
Alessandro Audisio
LPLavinia Di Prima
Lavinia Di Prima
CPChiara Pisano
Chiara Pisano
CBConsuelo Buttigliero
Consuelo Buttigliero
Significant progress has been achieved over the last decades in understanding the biology and mechanisms of tumor progression in urothelial carcinoma (UC). Although the therapeutic landscape has dramatically changed in recent years with the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors, advanced UC is still associated with rapidly progressing disease and poor survival. The increasing knowledge of the pathogenesis and molecular pathways underlying cancer development and progression is leading the introduction of target therapies, such as the recently approved FGFR inhibitor Erdafitinib, or the anti-nectin 4 antibody drug-conjugate Enfortumab vedotin. Antibody drug conjugates represent an innovative therapeutic approach that allows the combination of a tar get-specific monoclonal antibody covalently conjugated via a linker to a cytotoxic agent (payload). UC is a perfect candidate for this therapeutic approach since it is particularly enriched in antigen expression on its surface and each specific antigen can represent a potential therapeutic target. In this review we summarize the mechanism of action of ADCs, their applications in localized and metastatic UC, the main mechanisms of resistance, and future perspectives for their use in clinical practice.

21 January 2022 in Cells
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AAAlessandro Audisio
Alessandro Audisio
CBConsuelo Buttigliero
Consuelo Buttigliero
MDMarco Donatello Delcuratolo
Marco Donatello Delcuratolo
EPElena Parlagreco
Elena Parlagreco
MAMarco Audisio
Marco Audisio
MTMarcello Tucci
Marcello Tucci
Non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is characterized by a high rate of cure, but also by a non-negligible probability of recurrence and risk progression to muscle-invasive disease. NMIBC management requires a proper local resection and staging, followed by a risk-based treatment with intravesical agents. For many years, the current gold standard treatment for patients with intermediate or high-risk disease is transurethral resection of the bladder (TURB) followed by intravesical bacillus Calmette–Guérin (BCG) instillations. Unfortunately, in about half of high-risk patients, intravesical BCG treatment fails and NMIBC persists or recurs early. While radical cystectomy remains the gold standard for these patients, new therapeutic targets are being individuated and studied. Radical cystectomy in fact can provide an excellent long-term disease control, but can deeply interfere with quality of life. In particular, the enhanced immune checkpoints expression shown in BCG-unresponsive patients and the activity of immune checkpoints inhibitors (ICIs) in advanced bladder cancer provided the rationale for testing ICIs in NMIBC. Recently, pembrolizumab has shown promising activity in BCG-unresponsive NMIBC patients, obtaining FDA approval. Meanwhile multiple novel drugs with alternative mechanisms of action have proven to be safe and effective in NMIBC treatment and others are under investigation. The aim of this review is to analyse and describe the clinical activity of new emerging drugs in BCG-unresponsive NMIBC focusing on immunotherapy results.

22 July 2022 in Cancer Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
FTFabio Turco
Fabio Turco
MTMarcello Tucci
Marcello Tucci
MDMarco Donatello Delcuratolo
Marco Donatello Delcuratolo
RSRosario Francesco Di Stefano
Rosario Francesco Di Stefano
CPChiara Pisano
Chiara Pisano
CBConsuelo Buttigliero
Consuelo Buttigliero

21 July 2024 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MCMina Coussement
Mina Coussement
RFRoberta Fazio
Roberta Fazio
AAAlessandro Audisio
Alessandro Audisio
REReem Elkhoury
Reem Elkhoury
FAFatima-Zahra Abbassi
Fatima-Zahra Abbassi
FSFrancesco Jules Sclafani
Francesco Jules Sclafani
Immune checkpoint inhibitors and immune-related biomarkers are increasingly investigated in rectal cancer (RC). We retrospectively analysed PD-L1 expression in diagnostic biopsy and resection samples from RC patients treated at our centre between 2000 and 2020. PD-L1 immunostaining (22C3 clone) was evaluated according to tumour proportion (TPS), immune cell (ICS), and the combined positive score (CPS). Eighty-three patients were included. At diagnosis, PD-L1 expression ≥1%/≥5% was observed in 15.4%/0%, 80.7%/37.4%, and 69.2%/25.6% of patients based on TPS, ICS, and CPS, respectively. At surgery, the respective figures were 4.6%/1.5%, 60.2%/32.5%, and 50.7%/26.2%. Using the 1% cut-off and regardless of the scoring system, PD-L1 was less expressed in surgery than biopsy samples (p ≤ 0.04). In paired specimens, PD-L1-ICS reduction was especially observed following neoadjuvant long-course (chemo)radiotherapy (p = 0.03). PD-L1-ICS of ≥5% in surgical samples (HR: 0.17; p = 0.02), and a biopsy-to-surgery increase in PD-L1-ICS (HR: 0.19; p = 0.04) was predictive for longer disease-free survival, while the PD-L1-ICS of either ≥1% (HR 0.28; p = 0.04) or ≥5% (HR 0.19; p = 0.03) in surgical samples and the biopsy-to-surgery increase in PD-L1-ICS (HR: 0.20; p = 0.04) were associated with better overall survival. Our study suggests that PD-L1 expression in RC is largely reflective of immune cell infiltration, and its presence/increase in surgical samples predicts better outcomes.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SDSur Daniel
Sur Daniel
CCConstantin Ionut Coroama
Constantin Ionut Coroama
AAAlessandro Audisio
Alessandro Audisio
RFRoberta Fazio
Roberta Fazio
MCMaria Coroama
Maria Coroama
CLCristian Lungulescu
Cristian Lungulescu
Background: Arterial hypertension is regarded as a possible biomarker of treatment efficacy in colorectal cancer. Also, extended anti-angiogenic use in the metastatic treatment of the colorectal neoplasm may result in elevated blood pressure. We carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the clinical outcome of colorectal cancer patients with concomitant hypertension (HTN). Methods: We conducted a systematic search on Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed (Medline), the Cochrane Library, and CINAHL from inception until October 2023 for articles that addressed the relationship between HTN and progressive free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and overall response rate (ORR) for the first and second line of systemic therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Results: Eligibility criteria were met by 16 articles out of 802 screened studies. Pooled analysis showed that HTN was associated with significantly improved PFS (HR: 0.507, 95% CI: 0.460–0.558, p ≤ 0.001) and OS (HR: 0.677, 95% CI: 0.592–0.774, p ≤ 0.001) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. In addition, the pooled RR of HTN for the ORR (RR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.108–1.495, p = 0.001) suggests that HTN could be a predictive factor of ORR in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Conclusions: Elevated blood pressure is associated with better clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

9 January 2023 in Biomedicines
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
IPIrene Persano
Irene Persano
MCMassimiliano Cani
Massimiliano Cani
BRBenedetta Del Rio
Benedetta Del Rio
GFGiorgia Ferrari
Giorgia Ferrari
Edoardo GarboEdoardo Garbo
Edoardo Garbo
PBPaolo Bironzo
Paolo Bironzo
Safety data regarding BNT162b2 in cancer patients (CPs) are scarce. Herein we report the side effects (SEs), the adverse events (AEs), and the patient-reported outcomes (PROs) following BNT162b2 administration in CPs treated at the San Luigi Gonzaga University Hospital. All CPs who agreed to participate in our vaccination campaign received BNT162b2 and were included in the descriptive analysis. An anonymous questionnaire investigating the occurrence of SEs/AEs and PROs was administered to the study population 21 days after the first dose. Pearson’s chi-squared test was used to estimate the risk of experiencing SEs/AEs according to selected variables. A total of 997 patients were included in the study: 62.0% had stage IV cancer, and 68.8% were receiving an active treatment, of whom 15.9% were receiving immunotherapy. SEs/AEs were recorded in 37.1% of cases after the first dose and in 48.5% of cases after the second dose. The most common SEs were muscle pain/local rash (27.9% and 28%, after the first and second dose, respectively). Patients older than 70 years showed lower risk of SEs/AEs, while women showed a higher risk. Before receiving the vaccine, 18.2% of patients felt fearful and/or insecure about the vaccination. After the first dose, 57.5% of patients changed their feelings positively. Our data support the short-term safety of BNT162b2 in CPs, regardless of disease stage and concurrent treatments. Overall, the vaccination showed a positive impact on quality of life.