Purpose: To characterize pediatricians’ perceived barriers and areas of confidence in assessing patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in the U.S., and to test associations of these factors with implementing PRO assessment. Methods: Using a random sample from the members of American Medical Association, we recruited general pediatricians and pediatric subspecialists to complete a survey (July 2011 to December 2013). Perceived barriers and confidence in PRO assessment were compared by age, pediatric specialty (general pediatrics, seven subspecialties), practice settings (academic, private), and region of practice. Multivariable logistic regressions tested associations of demographic factors, barriers, and confidence factors with the implementation of PRO assessment. Findings: The survey was completed by 458 participants (response rate 48.5%); of these, 40.4%, 15.9%, 15.5%, and 8.1% were general pediatricians, cardiology, hematology/oncology, and pulmonary specialists, respectively. PRO assessment was implemented by 29.0% of the pediatricians. The top five barriers for PRO assessment included limited time/manpower (79.0%), limited training (77.4%), lengthy PRO instruments (76%), lack of meaningful cut-offs on PRO scores (75.5%), and unavailable PRO instruments (75.0%). Limited knowledge of PROs (OR 4.10; 95% CI 2.21, 7.60) and unavailability of PRO instruments (OR 1.87; 95% CI 1.01, 3.49) increased the odds of not implementing the assessment, whereas confidence in PRO assessments compatible with norms (OR 0.41; 95% CI 0.23, 0.72) and perceived benefit over clinical judgment alone (OR 0.53; 95% CI 0.31, 0.93) decreased the odds of not implementing the assessment. Interpretation: significant barriers to PRO assessment in pediatric settings suggest the need for providing training, resources, and practical guidance toward implementation. Patient or Public Contribution: healthcare service users contributed to this study by completing a survey and providing feedback about the barriers and areas of confidence in assessing PROs for pediatric populations.

Purpose: To examine the association between weight loss and type 2 diabetes remission among vulnerable populations living in medically underserved areas of the Mid-Southern United States. Design: Quantitative, retrospective cohort study. Setting: 114 ambulatory sites and 5 adults’ hospitals in the Mid-South participating in a regional diabetes registry. Participants: 9,900 adult patients with type 2 diabetes, stratified by remission status, with 1 year of baseline electronic medical record data, and 1 year of follow-up data for the 2015-2018 study period. Measures: The outcomes were diabetes remissions, categorized as any remission, partial remission, and complete remission based on the guidelines of the American Diabetes Association. The exposure was weight loss, calculated by the change in the Body Mass Index (BMI) as a proxy measure. Analysis: χ ² tests, Fisher’s exact tests, and the Mann-Whitney U-test were used to examine the differences in patient characteristics by remission status across the 3 remission categories, as appropriate. Multiple multivariable logistic regressions adjusting for confounders were performed to estimate the adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for the associations between weight loss and diabetes remission. Results: Among 9,900 patients identified, a reduction of 0.3 kg/m ² (standard deviation: 2.5) in the average BMI from the baseline to the follow-up was observed. 10.8% achieved any type of remission, with 9.8% for partial and 1.0% for complete remissions. Greater weight loss was significantly associated with an increased likelihood of any (aOR = 1.07, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.06-1.08), partial (aOR 1.06, 95% CI, 1.04-1.07), and complete diabetes remission (aOR 1.10, 95% CI, 1.07-1.13). Conclusions: Weight loss is significantly associated with diabetes remission among patients living in medically underserved areas, but complete remission is rare.

The aim of this scoping review was to review and assess recent studies on the efficacy of home-based occupational therapy interventions for adults post-stroke. The number of efficacy studies is limited. The few studies available suggest that occupational therapy delivered in home settings may improve outcomes for stroke patients. There is also limited use of occupation-based assessments, interventions, and outcome measures in studies addressing home-based occupational therapy. Methodologies should be improved to include contexts, caregiver training, and self-efficacy. Further high-quality studies are needed on the efficacy home-based occupational therapy services.

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic led to a major transition for patients from routine ambulatory-care-based in-person primary care visits to telehealth visits to manage chronic diseases. However, it remains unclear the extent to which individuals access telehealth services and whether such utilization varies along neighborhood characteristics, especially among racial minorities. This study aims to examine the association of outpatient telehealth utilization with sociodemographic, clinical, and neighborhood characteristics among adults with ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSCs) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: We included adults treated for an ACSC between March 5, 2020, and December 31, 2020, at a single ambulatory-care-based healthcare system, which serves a large population of low-income patients in the South region of the United States (i.e., Memphis, TN, Metropolitan Statistical Area). Telehealth utilization was defined by outpatient procedural codes and providers’ notes on the type of visits. Generalized linear mixed models were used to examine the association of sociodemographic, clinical, and neighborhood factors with telehealth utilization in the overall cohort and the racial subpopulations. Results: Among the 13,962 adults with ACSCs, 8583 (62.5%) used outpatient telehealth services. Patients who were older, female, with mental disorders, and who had more comorbidities had higher rates of telehealth services ( p < .05). Controlling for covariates, we observed 75.2% and 23.1% increased use of telehealth services among Hispanics and other race groups, respectively, compared to Whites. Patients who commuted more than 30 minutes to health facilities were slightly less likely to use telehealth services [OR: 0.994 (0.991,0.998)]. Racial minorities (Blacks and Hispanics) with mental disorders were more likely to use telehealth service when compared to Whites. Discussion: We found that among patients being treated for ACSCs, the use of telehealth services was highly prevalent in Hispanic patients in general and were more pronounced among both Hispanics and Black patients who have mental disorders.