Topical ophthalmic drug delivery targeting the posterior segment of the eye has become a key area of interest due to its non-invasive nature, safety, ease of application, patient compliance, and cost-effectiveness. However, achievement of effective drug bioavailability in the posterior ocular segment is a significant challenge due to unique ocular barriers, including precorneal factors and anatomical barriers, like the cornea, the conjunctiva, and the sclera. Successful ocular drug delivery systems require increased precorneal residence time and improved corneal penetration to enhance intraocular bioavailability. A promising strategy to overcome these barriers is incorporating drug penetration enhancers (DPEs) into formulations. These compounds facilitate drug delivery by improving permeability across otherwise impermeable or poorly permeable membranes. At the ocular level, they act through three primary mechanisms: breaking tear film stability by interfering with the mucous layer; disrupting membrane components such as phospholipids and proteins; and loosening epithelial cellular junctions. DPEs offer significant potential to improve bioavailability and therapeutic outcomes, particularly for drugs targeting the posterior segment of the eye. This review is focused on analyzing the current literature regarding the use of penetration enhancers in topical ocular drug delivery, highlighting their mechanisms of action and potential to revolutionize ophthalmic treatments.

A 12-year-old male neutered domestic shorthair cat underwent rhinoscopy due to inspiratory dyspnoea and stertor. Rhinoscopy showed signs of chronic rhinitis and a multinodular nasopharyngeal mucosa. A marked infiltrate of macrophages that contained intracellular parasitic forms morphologically compatible with Leishmania amastigotes were observed on histopathological examination of nasal and nasopharyngeal biopsies. PCR from nasal tissue was positive for Leishmania infantum DNA, confirming the diagnosis of granulomatous rhinitis secondary to this parasite. Two eyelid nodules were identified 2 weeks later. Fine-needle aspiration revealed Leishmania amastigotes within macrophages and in the background. Allopurinol therapy was started, but 5 days later the cat developed dermatological signs compatible with a cutaneous adverse drug reaction. The drug was discontinued and meglumine antimoniate prescribed. Twenty-five days later, the cat presented with acute kidney injury and meglumine antimoniate was discontinued. Despite clinical improvement after fluid therapy, mild azotaemia persisted. The cat was subsequently treated with nucleotides and active hexose correlated compounds (N-AHCC). Four months later upper respiratory signs were exacerbated. A relapse of granulomatous rhinitis was suspected and miltefosine therapy started. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) worsened during miltefosine treatment, having improved under fluid therapy. Since then, the cat has been treated with N-AHCC and renal diet and at the time of writing shows stable CKD with no recurrence of respiratory signs. This case describes Leishmania infantum as a cause of granulomatous rhinitis in a cat without cutaneous lesions, reporting the alternative use of N-AHCC and miltefosine when allopurinol seemed to have induced a cutaneous rash and there was acute kidney injury (AKI) after meglumine antimoniate therapy.