Thomas Lee Sutton

Dr. Thomas Lee Sutton

Oregon Health & Science University
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
8 September 2023 in Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JFJennifer M. Finan
Jennifer M. Finan
Thomas Lee SuttonThomas Lee Sutton
Thomas Lee Sutton
Dan A DixonDan A Dixon
Dan A Dixon
JBJonathan Brody
Jonathan Brody
The RNA-binding protein human antigen R (HuR) is a well-established regulator of gene expression at the posttranscriptional level. Its dysregulation has been implicated in various human diseases, particularly cancer. In cancer, HuR is considered “active” when it shows increased subcellular localization in the cytoplasm, in addition to its normal nuclear localization. Cytoplasmic HuR plays a crucial role in stabilizing and enhancing the translation of prosurvival mRNAs that are involved in stress responses relevant to cancer progression, such as hypoxia, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. In general, due to HuR's abundance and function in cancer cells compared with normal cells, it is an appealing target for oncology research. Exploiting the principles underlying HuR's role in tumorigenesis and resistance to stressors, targeting HuR has the potential for synergy with existing and novel oncologic therapies. This review aims to explore HuR's role in homeostasis and cancer pathophysiology, as well as current targeting strategies, which include silencing HuR expression, preventing its translocation and dimerization from the nucleus to the cytoplasm, and inhibiting mRNA binding. Furthermore, this review will discuss recent studies investigating the potential synergy between HuR inhibition and traditional chemotherapeutics.

11 August 2022 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Thomas Lee SuttonThomas Lee Sutton
Thomas Lee Sutton
RPResident Kamalesh Patel
Resident Kamalesh Patel
AAAshley Anderson
Ashley Anderson
SBStephen G. Bowden
Stephen G. Bowden
Riley M WhalenRiley M Whalen
Riley M Whalen
MWMelissa H. Wong
Melissa H. Wong
Cancer remains a significant cause of mortality in developed countries, due in part to difficulties in early detection, understanding disease biology, and assessing treatment response. If effectively harnessed, circulating biomarkers promise to fulfill these needs through non-invasive “liquid” biopsy. While tumors disseminate genetic material and cellular debris into circulation, identifying clinically relevant information from these analytes has proven difficult. In contrast, cell-based circulating biomarkers have multiple advantages, including a source for tumor DNA and protein, and as a cellular reflection of the evolving tumor. While circulating tumor cells (CTCs) have dominated the circulating cell biomarker field, their clinical utility beyond that of prognostication has remained elusive, due to their rarity. Recently, two novel populations of circulating tumor-immune hybrid cells in cancer have been characterized: cancer-associated macrophage-like cells (CAMLs) and circulating hybrid cells (CHCs). CAMLs are macrophage-like cells containing phagocytosed tumor material, while CHCs can result from cell fusion between cancer and immune cells and play a role in the metastatic cascade. Both are detected in higher numbers than CTCs in peripheral blood and demonstrate utility in prognostication and assessing treatment response. Additionally, both cell populations are heterogeneous in their genetic, transcriptomic, and proteomic signatures, and thus have the potential to inform on heterogeneity within tumors. Herein, we review the advances in this exciting field.

23 July 2014 in Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SPSagar Patel
Sagar Patel
JGJ. Alex Grizzell
J. Alex Grizzell
RHRosalee Holmes
Rosalee Holmes
RZRoss Zeitlin
Ross Zeitlin
RSRosalynn Solomon
Rosalynn Solomon
VMValentina Echeverria Moran
Valentina Echeverria Moran
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is associated with cognitive and non-cognitive symptoms for which there are currently no effective therapies. We have previously reported that cotinine, a natural product obtained from tobacco leaves, prevented memory loss and diminished amyloid-β (Aβ) plaque pathology in the transgenic 6799 mice (Tg6799 mice) when treated prior to the development of the pathology. We have also shown that cotinine reduces depressive-like behavior in normal and chronically stressed C57BL/6 mice. Here, we extend our previous studies by investigating the effects of cotinine on the progression of AD-like pathology, depressive-like behavior, and the mechanisms underlying its beneficial effects in the Tg6799 mice when left untreated until after a more advanced stage of the disease’s development. The results show that vehicle-treated Tg6799 mice displayed an accentuated loss of working memory and an abundant Aβ plaque pathology that were accompanied by higher levels of depressive-like behavior as compared to control littermates. By contrast, prolonged daily cotinine treatment, withheld until after a mid-level progression of AD-like pathology, reduced Aβ levels, Aβ plaques, and depressive-like behavior as well as dramatically improved working memory in Tg6799 mice to levels no different from control littermates. The beneficial effects of cotinine were accompanied by an increase in the expression of the active form of protein kinase B (Akt) and the postsynaptic density protein 95 (PSD95) in the hippocampi and frontal cortices of Tg6799 mice. This suggests that cotinine halts the progression of AD-like pathology while reducing depressive-like behavior by stimulating signaling pathways supporting synaptic plasticity in Tg6799 mice. The potential use of cotinine to treat cognitive and non-cognitive symptoms of AD is discussed.

1 June 2021 in The American Journal of Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Thomas Lee SuttonThomas Lee Sutton
Thomas Lee Sutton
KBKevin G. Billingsley
Kevin G. Billingsley
BWBrett S. Walker
Brett S. Walker
CEC. Kristian Enestvedt
C. Kristian Enestvedt
EDElizabeth N. Dewey
Elizabeth N. Dewey
SMSkye C. Mayo
Skye C. Mayo

30 October 2020 in Journal of Surgical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Thomas Lee SuttonThomas Lee Sutton
Thomas Lee Sutton
ASAlexander Schlitt
Alexander Schlitt
SGStuart K. Gardiner
Stuart K. Gardiner
NJNathalie Johnson
Nathalie Johnson
JGJennifer R. Garreau
Jennifer R. Garreau

29 July 2021 in Clinical Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ASAshwyn K. Sharma
Ashwyn K. Sharma
JTJorge de la Torre
Jorge de la Torre
NINikki IJzerman
Nikki IJzerman
Thomas Lee SuttonThomas Lee Sutton
Thomas Lee Sutton
BZBeiqun Zhao
Beiqun Zhao
JSJason Keith Sicklick
Jason Keith Sicklick
Purpose: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) commonly arise in different regions of the stomach and are driven by various mutations (most often in KIT, PDGFRA, and SDHx). We hypothesized that the anatomic location of gastric GIST is associated with unique genomic profiles and distinct driver mutations. Experimental Design: We compared KIT versus non-KIT status with tumor location within the National Cancer Database (NCDB) for 2,418 patients with primary gastric GIST. Additionally, we compiled an international cohort (TransAtlantic GIST Collaborative, TAGC) of 236 patients and reviewed sequencing results, cross-sectional imaging, and operative reports. Subgroup analyses were performed for tumors located proximally versus distally. Risk factors for KIT versus non-KIT tumors were identified using multivariate regression analysis. A random forest machine learning model was then developed to determine feature importance. Results: Within the NCDB cohort, non-KIT mutants dominated distal tumor locations (P < 0.03). Proximal GIST were almost exclusively KIT mutant (96%) in the TAGC cohort, whereas 100% of PDGFRA and SDH-mutant GIST occurred in the distal stomach. On multivariate regression analysis, tumor location was associated with KIT versus non-KIT mutations. Using random forest machine learning analysis, stomach location was the most important feature for predicting mutation status. Conclusions: We provide the first evidence that the mutational landscape of gastric GIST is related to tumor location. Proximal gastric GIST are overwhelmingly KIT mutant, irrespective of morphology or age, whereas distal tumors display non-KIT genomic diversity. Anatomic location of gastric GIST may therefore provide immediate guidance for clinical treatment decisions and selective confirmatory genomic testing when resources are limited.