Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a common chronic condition in the elderly. However, the earlier CAD begins, the stronger its impact on lifestyle and costs of health and social care. The present study analyzes clinical and angiographic features and the outcome of very young patients undergoing coronary angiography due to suspected CAD, including a nested case-control study of ≤40-year-old patients referred for coronary angiography. Patients were divided into two groups: cases with significant angiographic stenosis, and controls with non-significant stenosis. Of the 19,321 coronary angiographies performed in our center in a period of 10 years, 504 (2.6%) were in patients ≤40 years. The most common cardiovascular risk factors for significant CAD were smoking (OR 2.96; 95% CI 1.65–5.37), dyslipidemia (OR 2.18; 95% CI 1.27–3.82), and family history of CAD (OR 1.95; 95% CI 1.05–3.75). The incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) at follow-up was significantly higher in the cases compared to controls (HR 2.71; 95% CI 1.44–5.11). Three conventional coronary risk factors were directly related to the early signs of CAD. MACE in the long-term follow-up is associated to dyslipidaemia and hypertriglyceridemia. Focusing efforts for the adequate control of CAD in young patients is a priority given the high socio-medical cost that this disease entails to society.

Coronary artery disease is a chronic disease with an increased expression in the elderly. However, different studies have shown an increased incidence in young subjects over the last decades. The prediction of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in very young patients has a significant impact on medical decision-making following coronary angiography and the selection of treatment. Different approaches have been developed to identify patients at a higher risk of adverse outcomes after their coronary anatomy is known. This is a prognostic study of combined data from patients ≤40 years old undergoing coronary angiography (n = 492). We evaluated whether different machine learning (ML) approaches could predict MACE more effectively than traditional statistical methods using logistic regression (LR). Our most effective model for long-term follow-up (60 ± 27 months) was random forest (RF), obtaining an area under the curve (AUC) = 0.79 (95%CI 0.69–0.88), in contrast with LR, obtaining AUC = 0.66 (95%CI 0.53–0.78, p = 0.021). At 1-year follow-up, the RF test found AUC 0.80 (95%CI 0.71–0.89) vs. LR 0.50 (95%CI 0.33–0.66, p < 0.001). The results of our study support the hypothesis that ML methods can improve both the identification of MACE risk patients and the prediction vs. traditional statistical techniques even in a small sample size. The application of ML techniques to focus the efforts on the detection of MACE in very young patients after coronary angiography could help tailor upfront follow-up strategies in such young patients according to their risk of MACE and to be used for proper assignment of health resources.

Background. The main cause of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is coronary artery obstruction due to atherosclerotic plaque growth or thrombus formation secondary to plaque rupture or erosion. However, there is a subgroup of patients with signs and symptoms suggestive of ACS but without relevant coronary artery obstruction on coronary angiography. This population is defined as myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA). The present study analyzes the clinical features and outcomes of very young patients with a diagnosis of MINOCA. Method. Nested case-control study of 40-year-old patients referred for coronary angiography due to clinical suspicion of ACS. Patients were divided into three groups: patients with obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD), patients diagnosed with MINOCA, and controls with non-coronary artery disease. Results. Of 19,321 coronary angiographies performed in our center in a period of 10 years, 408 (2.1) were in patients 40 years old, and MINOCA was identified in 32 (21) patients. The cardiovascular risk factors for obstructive CAD and MINOCA were very similar. The incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) at follow-up was significantly higher in the MINOCA (HR 4.13 (95CI 1.2213.89) and obstructive CAD (HR 4.59 (95CI 1.9010.99) patients compared to controls. Cocaine use HR 14.58 (95CI 3.0869.02), family history of CAD HR 6.20 (95CI 1.4027.43), and depression HR 5.16 (95CI 1.0625.24) were associated with a poor outcome in the MINOCA population. Conclusion. Very young patients with MINOCA had a poor prognosis at long-term follow-up, similar to patients with obstructive CAD. Focusing efforts on secondary prevention is essential in this population.

Background: Nowadays, good clinical practice should be established in human research. Patient’s rights and autonomy must be respected above the interest of the researcher, making mandatory to raise patient’s awareness on the implications of participating in a clinical study. Contrary to popular belief, this is not always the case. This means that, after signing the informed consent form, some patients have difficulties understanding their responsibilities as participants.Materials and methods: This study is a prospective, multicenter, non-randomized controlled trial comparative survey conducted on patients enrolled in a clinical trial to evaluate and improve their understanding after an educational intervention was applied to the research staff.Results: Females were underrepresented in the clinical trials performed in this study, 21.5%. Most of the participants had a low educational level (74.4%). Around 5 and 10% of the research participants were not aware they were part of a clinical study, and more 24% just trusted in the medical decision to be enrolled. After the interventional education, the following items: “given time and resolution of the patient doubts” (p-value = 0.003), “enough written information” (p-value = 0.006), “explanation of the risks of participating in the study,” (p-value = 0.047) and understanding of the information provided to them showed an improvement regarding the study in which they were participating.Conclusion: The research participants understanding of their involvement in clinical trials is limited. An educational intervention on the research team can improve the process of empowerment and transit of information.

Introduction: ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is one of the most prevalent presentations in young patients. It is essential to emphasise that each minute of delay in providing medical care is negatively correlated to the patient’s prognosis. The present study was carried out to evaluate the ischaemia-reperfusion times in patients ≤40 years of age versus individuals >40 years of age and their association with mortality and major adverse cardiac event (MACE) over the long term. Methods: A retrospective, multicentre cohort study was carried out in 6799 patients diagnosed with STEMI. Two groups were established: patients diagnosed with STEMI and aged >40 years, and patients diagnosed with STEMI and aged ≤40 years. Results: The patients in the young group had a significantly sooner electrocardiographic diagnosis than the patients >40 years of age. A delay was observed in females, with a relative risk (RR) of 1.21 (95% CI 1.13 to 1.30) (p<0.001). Presenting dyspnoea (RR 1.76, 95% CI 1.5 to 2.06) (p<0.001) or going to a hospital without haemodynamics (RR 1.55, 95% CI 1.45 to 1.67) (p<0.001) was related to increased delay. The occurrence of MACE in the first year of follow-up was related to different risk factors, along with a delay in healthcare (HR 1.25, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.54) (p<0.042). Conclusion: This study shows that young patients with STEMI tend to receive a sooner diagnosis than older individuals. Delays in healthcare represent one of the main factors related to the occurrence of MACE and non-event-free survival.