Renske Kruizinga

Dr. Renske Kruizinga

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
10 August 2015 in Psycho-Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RKRenske Kruizinga
Renske Kruizinga
IHIris D. Hartog
Iris D. Hartog
MJMarc Jacobs
Marc Jacobs
JDJoost G. Daams
Joost G. Daams
MSMichael Scherer‐Rath
Michael Scherer‐Rath
HLHanneke W. M. Van Laarhoven
Hanneke W. M. Van Laarhoven

26 September 2017 in Journal of Health Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
IHIris Hartog
Iris Hartog
MSMichael Scherer-Rath
Michael Scherer-Rath
RKRenske Kruizinga
Renske Kruizinga
JNJustine Netjes
Justine Netjes
Jose HenriquesJose Henriques
Jose Henriques
HLHanneke van Laarhoven
Hanneke van Laarhoven
Falling seriously ill is often experienced as a life event that causes conflict with people’s personal goals and expectations in life and evokes existential questions. This article presents a new humanities approach to the way people make meaning of such events and how this influences their quality of life. Incorporating theories on contingency, narrative identity, and quality of life, we developed a theoretical model entailing the concepts life event, worldview, ultimate life goals, experience of contingency, narrative meaning making, narrative integration, and quality of life. We formulate testable hypotheses and describe the self-report questionnaire that was developed based on the model.

1 March 2018 in Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RKRenske Kruizinga
Renske Kruizinga
MSMichael Scherer-Rath
Michael Scherer-Rath
HSHans J.B.A.M. Schilderman
Hans J.B.A.M. Schilderman
CPChristina M. Puchalski
Christina M. Puchalski
HLHanneke H.W.M. van Laarhoven
Hanneke H.W.M. van Laarhoven

4 August 2017 in European Journal of Cancer Care
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Bella VivatBella Vivat
Bella Vivat
TYT.E. Young
T.E. Young
JWJ. Winstanley
J. Winstanley
JAJ.I. Arraras
J.I. Arraras
KBK. Black
K. Black
OGOn behalf of the EORTC Quality of Life Group
On behalf of the EORTC Quality of Life Group

1 November 2014 in Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EOErik Olsman
Erik Olsman
WDWendy Duggleby
Wendy Duggleby
CNCheryl Nekolaichuk
Cheryl Nekolaichuk
DWDick Willems
Dick Willems
JGJudith Gagnon
Judith Gagnon
CLCarlo Leget
Carlo Leget

20 December 2016 in Palliative and Supportive Care
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RKRenske Kruizinga
Renske Kruizinga
IHIris D. Hartog
Iris D. Hartog
MSMichael Scherer-Rath
Michael Scherer-Rath
HSHans Schilderman
Hans Schilderman
HLHanneke Van Laarhoven
Hanneke Van Laarhoven
Objective: Throughout their lives, people are confronted with unexpected life events, which can be difficult to incorporate into their life narratives. Such a confrontation can result in an experience of contingency. Different ways of relating to contingency have been described by Wuchterl: denying, acknowledging, and “encounter with the Other.” In the present article, we aim to trace these theoretical distinctions in real-life experiences of patients.Method: We analyzed 45 interviews using the constant comparative method with a directed content analysis approach in the Atlas.ti coding program. The interviews originated from a randomized controlled trial evaluating an assisted reflection on life events and ultimate life goals. Seven spiritual counselors from six hospitals in the Netherlands conducted the interviews from July of 2014 to March of 2016. All 45 patients had advanced cancer.Results: We found four different modes into which relating to contingency can be classified: denying, acknowledging, accepting, and receiving. With denying, patients did not mention any impact of the life event on their lives. In acknowledging, the impact was recognized and a start was made to incorporate the event into their life. In accepting, patients went through a process of reinterpretation of the event. In receiving, patients talked about receiving insights from their illness and living a more conscious life.Significance of results: Our study is the first to investigate the different ways of relating to contingency in clinical practice. The defined modes will improve our understanding of the various ways in which cancer patients relate to their disease, allowing caregivers to better target and shape individual care.