Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is successfully used in patients with advanced prostatic cancer, but there are many concerns about its systemic side effects, especially due to advanced age and frequent comorbidities in most patients. In patients treated with ADT there are metabolic changes involving the glycaemic control and lipid metabolism, increased thrombotic risk, an increased risk of myocardial infarction, severe arrhythmia and sudden cardiac death. Still, these adverse effects can be also due to the subsequent hypogonadism. Men with heart failure or coronary artery disease have a lower level of serum testosterone than normal men of the same age, and hypogonadism is related to higher cardiovascular mortality. Many clinical studies compared the cardiovascular effects of hypogonadism post orchiectomy or radiotherapy with those of ADT but their results are controversial. However, current data suggest that more intensive treatment of cardiovascular risk factors and closer cardiological follow-up of older patients under ADT might be beneficial. Our paper is a narrative review of the literature data in this field.

Worsening chronic heart failure (HF) is responsible for recurrent hospitalization and increased mortality risk after discharge, irrespective to the ejection fraction. Symptoms and signs of pulmonary and systemic congestion are the most common cause for hospitalization of acute decompensated HF, as a consequence of increased cardiac filling pressures. The elevated cardiac filling pressures, also called hemodynamic congestion, may precede the occurrence of clinical congestion by days or weeks. Since HF patients often have comorbidities, dyspnoea, the main symptom of HF, may be also caused by respiratory or other illnesses. Recent studies underline the importance of the diagnosis and treatment of hemodynamic congestion before HF symptoms worsen, reducing hospitalization and improving prognosis. In this paper we review the role of integrated evaluation of biomarkers and imaging technics, i.e., echocardiography and pulmonary ultrasound, for the diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of congestion in HF patients.

Acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) represents a major healthcare burden, with residual congestion at discharge being a critical determinant of poor outcomes. Despite its prognostic significance, the assessment of decongestion status before discharge remains suboptimal, highlighting the need for a more comprehensive evaluation approach. This descriptive review synthesizes current evidence on congestion assessment methods in ADHF, focusing on their role in discharge decision-making and prognostic value. We describe various evaluation tools, including clinical examination, biomarkers, imaging techniques, and congestion scores, presenting their integration into a practical assessment algorithm. A comprehensive algorithm for congestion assessment before discharge is presented, incorporating multimodal evaluation techniques, with the aim of highlighting the practical utility of various assessment methods in guiding treatment decisions and determining optimal discharge timing. Integration of multiple parameters provides superior accuracy in evaluating decongestion status compared to single-method approaches. A standardized, multimodal approach to congestion assessment before discharge is essential for optimal ADHF management. The proposed assessment algorithm, combining clinical, biochemical, and imaging parameters, offers a practical framework for more reliable discharge decision-making, potentially improving patient outcomes.

Background. Patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) have five times higher risk of stroke than the general population. Anticoagulation (ACO) in NVAF is a class I indication after assessing the CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores. However, in the real world, NVAF patients receive less ACO than needed due to patients’ comorbidities that can be assessed by the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI). The use of non-antivitamin K anticoagulants (NOAC) has improved the decision to anticoagulate. Objective. We analyzed the factors influencing the ACO prescribing decision in NVAF patients in the real world and the changes induced by the introduction of NOAC. Method. We carried out an observational retrospective cross-sectional study that included consecutive patients with permanent NVAF and CHA2DS2-VASc ≥ 2, admitted to a community hospital between 2010–2011 (group 1, 286 patients), when only vitamin K antagonists (VKA) were used, and 2018–2019 (group 2, 433 patients), respectively. We calculated CHA2DS2-VASc, HAS-BLED, and CCI and recorded the ACO decision and the use of VKA or NOAC in group 2. We compared the calculated scores between ACO and non-anticoagulated (nonACO) patients in both groups and between groups. Results. A 31.5% share of patients in group 1 and 12.9% in group 2 did not receive ACO despite a CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥ 2. In group 1, nonACO patients had higher HAS-BLED and CCI scores than the ACO patients, but their CHA2DS2-VASc scores were not significantly different. Old age, dementia, severe chronic kidney disease, neoplasia, and anemia were the most frequent reasons not to prescribe anticoagulants. In group 2, more nonACO patients had dementia, diabetes mellitus, and higher HAS-BLED than ACO patients. Moderate-severe CKD, neoplasia with metastasis, liver disease, anemia, and diabetes mellitus were statistically significantly more frequent in nonACO patients from group 1 than those from group 2. In group 2, 55.7% of ACO patients received NOAC. Conclusions. In real-world clinical practice, the decision for anticoagulation in NVAF is influenced by patient age, comorbidities, and risk of bleeding, and many patients do not receive anticoagulants despite a high CHA2DS2-VASc score. The use of NOAC in the past few years has improved treatment decisions. At the same time, the correct diagnosis, treatment, and surveillance of comorbidities have cut down the risk of bleeding and allowed anticoagulant use according to guidelines.

Cardiovascular complications increasingly challenge survivors of urological cancers, given the cardiotoxicity of therapies such as androgen deprivation, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitors, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and chemotherapy. This narrative review addresses the complex crosstalk between urological cancer treatment and cardiovascular disease. It summarizes cardiovascular toxicities linked to major antineoplastic agents, explores underlying mechanisms including metabolic and immune-mediated effects, and proposes strategies for surveillance, diagnosis, and management. Highlighting the need for multidisciplinary collaboration, it outlines future directions for research to optimize cardiovascular outcomes in this high-risk population. The increasing complexity of cardiovascular care in patients with urological malignancies highlights the need for closer collaboration between cardiologists, urologists, and oncologists, with uro-cardio-oncology emerging as an important multidisciplinary field.

We present the case of a patient with heart failure with reduced left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction, diagnosed in the first instance by echocardiography and further on by more accurate cardiac magnetic resonance imaging with LV non-compaction (LVNC). Blood tests showed high erythrocyte and hematocrit levels, inappropriate in this setting, whilst Janus Kinase 2V617F mutation was absent, erythropoietin level was slightly increased, and arterial O2 pressure level was normal. At the time of diagnosis, the patient had mild renal impairment, and abdominal echography revealed bilateral polycystic kidney disease (PKD). The patient had one son who fulfilled the echocardiographic criteria for LVNC and had bilateral renal cysts revealed by abdominal ultrasound. The genes responsible for autosomal dominant PKD (ADPKD) development are PKD1, on chromosome 16, coding for polycystin 1 and PKD2, on chromosome 4, coding for polycystin 2. There are some experimental data which suggest that polycystins might play an important role in cardiac development and hence PKD1 and PKD2 mutations may be involved in primary cardiomyopathies. These data could explain this particular association between LVNC and ADPKD. To date, there are only a few isolated cases reported, and only one shows this association in more than one member of the same family. Further genetic testing in the few reported cases would presumably elucidate whether this finding is the result of complex genetic synergy or just a simple coincidence.