Fiona Cramp

Prof. Fiona Cramp

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

27Years (2000-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
14 November 2012 in Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FCFiona Cramp
Fiona Cramp
JBJames Byron-Daniel
James Byron-Daniel
Cancer-related fatigue is recognised as an important symptom associated with cancer and its treatment. A number of studies have investigated the effects of physical activity in reducing cancer-related fatigue. This is an updated version of the original Cochrane review published in The Cochrane Library (2008, Issue 1). The original review identified some benefits of physical activity on fatigue in cancer both during and after adjuvant treatment. We identified a number of limitations in the evidence, providing clear justification for an updated review. To evaluate the effect of exercise on cancer-related fatigue both during and after cancer treatment. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (Issue 1, 2011), MEDLINE (1966 to March 2011), EMBASE (1980 to March 2011), CINAHL (1982 to March 2011), British Nursing Index (January 1984 to March 2011), AMED (1985 to March 2011), SIGLE (1980 to March 2011) and Dissertation Abstracts International (1861 to March 2011) using key words. We also searched reference lists off all studies identified for inclusion and relevant reviews. In addition, we handsearched relevant journals and contacted experts in the field of cancer-related fatigue. We sought and included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated the effect of exercise on cancer-related fatigue in adults. Two review authors independently assessed the risk of bias of studies and extracted data based upon predefined criteria. Where data were available we performed meta-analyses for fatigue using a random-effects model. For this update we identified a total of 56 studies (4068 participants) for inclusion (28 from the original search and 28 from the updated search), with the majority carried out in participants with breast cancer (28 studies). A meta-analysis of all fatigue data, incorporating 38 comparisons, provided data for 1461 participants who received an exercise intervention and 1187 control participants. At the end of the intervention period exercise was seen to be statistically more effective than the control intervention (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.37 to -0.17). Benefits of exercise on fatigue were observed for interventions delivered during or post-adjuvant cancer therapy. In relation to diagnosis, we identified benefits of exercise on fatigue for breast and prostate cancer but not for those with haematological malignancies. Finally, aerobic exercise significantly reduced fatigue but resistance training and alternative forms of exercise failed to reach significance. The findings of the updated review have enabled a more precise conclusion to be made in that aerobic exercise can be regarded as beneficial for individuals with cancer-related fatigue during and post-cancer therapy, specifically those with solid tumours. Further research is required to determine the optimal type, intensity and timing of an exercise intervention.

1 May 2006 in European Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GPGillian Prue
Gillian Prue
JRJ. Rankin
J. Rankin
JAJ. Allen
J. Allen
JGJ. Gracey
J. Gracey
FCFiona Cramp
Fiona Cramp

23 April 2008
Verified
Reference Entry
Open access
PDF file
FCFiona Cramp
Fiona Cramp
JDJames Daniel
James Daniel
Background Cancer‐related fatigue is now recognised as an important symptom associated with cancer and its treatment. A number of studies have investigated the effects of physical activity in reducing cancer‐related fatigue with no definitive conclusions regarding its effectiveness. Objectives To evaluate the effect of exercise on cancer‐related fatigue both during and after cancer treatment. Search methods The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (CENTRAL/CCTR), MEDLINE (1966 to July 2007), EMBASE (1980 to July 2007), CINAHL (1982 to July 2007), British Nursing Index (January 1984 to July 2007), AMED (1985 to July 2007), SIGLE (1980 to July 2007), and Dissertation Abstracts International (1861 to July 2007) were all searched using key words. Reference lists off all studies identified for inclusion and relevant reviews were also searched. In addition, relevant journals were hand searched and experts in the field of cancer‐related fatigue were contacted. Selection criteria Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated the effect of exercise on cancer‐related fatigue in adults were included. Data collection and analysis Two review authors independently assessed the methodological quality of studies and extracted data based upon predefined criteria. Where data were available meta‐analyses were performed for fatigue using a random‐effects model. Main results Twenty‐eight studies were identified for inclusion (n = 2083 participants), with the majority carried out on participants with breast cancer (n = 16 studies; n = 1172 participants). A meta‐analysis of all fatigue data, incorporating 22 comparisons provided data for 920 participants who received an exercise intervention and 742 control participants. At the end of the intervention period exercise was statistically more effective than the control intervention (SMD ‐0.23, 95% Confidence Interval (CIs) ‐0.33 to ‐0.13). Authors' conclusions Exercise can be regarded as beneficial for individuals with cancer‐related fatigue during and post cancer therapy. Further research is required to determine the optimal type, intensity and timing of an exercise intervention.

15 May 2015 in Supportive Care in Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MGMultinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer Fatigue Study Group–Biomarker Working Group
Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer Fatigue Study Group–Biomarker Working Group
LSLeorey N. Saligan
Leorey N. Saligan
KOKarin Olson
Karin Olson
KFKristin Filler
Kristin Filler
DLDavid Larkin
David Larkin
KMKaren Mustian
Karen Mustian

4 September 2010 in Rheumatology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SHSarah Hewlett
Sarah Hewlett
TCTrudie Ann Chalder
Trudie Ann Chalder
ECErnest Choy
Ernest Choy
FCFiona Cramp
Fiona Cramp
BDBev Davis
Bev Davis
JKJohn Kirwan
John Kirwan
An under-acknowledged patient concern requires a new approach

20 May 2013 in Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
OMOllie Minton
Ollie Minton
ABAnn Berger
Ann Berger
ABAndrea Barsevick
Andrea Barsevick
FCFiona Cramp
Fiona Cramp
MGMartine Goedendorp
Martine Goedendorp
PSPatrick C. Stone
Patrick C. Stone