To address the current lack of dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance imaging (DSC–MRI)-based radiomics to predict isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutations in gliomas, we present a multicenter study that featured an independent exploratory set for radiomics model development and external validation using two independent cohorts. The maximum performance of the IDH mutation status prediction on the validation set had an accuracy of 0.544 (Cohen’s kappa: 0.145, F1-score: 0.415, area under the curve-AUC: 0.639, sensitivity: 0.733, specificity: 0.491), which significantly improved to an accuracy of 0.706 (Cohen’s kappa: 0.282, F1-score: 0.474, AUC: 0.667, sensitivity: 0.6, specificity: 0.736) when dynamic-based standardization of the images was performed prior to the radiomics. Model explainability using local interpretable model-agnostic explanations (LIME) and Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) revealed potential intuitive correlations between the IDH–wildtype increased heterogeneity and the texture complexity. These results strengthened our hypothesis that DSC–MRI radiogenomics in gliomas hold the potential to provide increased predictive performance from models that generalize well and provide understandable patterns between IDH mutation status and the extracted features toward enabling the clinical translation of radiogenomics in neuro-oncology.

Purpose: Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation and 1p19q codeletion status are important for managing glioma patients. However, current practice dictates invasive tissue sampling for histomolecular classification. We investigated the current value of dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MR perfusion imaging as a tool for the non-invasive identification of these biomarkers. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Medline, and Embase up to 2023 was performed, and meta-analyses were conducted. We removed studies employing machine learning models or using multiparametric imaging. We used random-effects standardized mean difference (SMD) and bivariate sensitivity-specificity meta-analyses, calculated the area under the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and performed meta-regressions using technical acquisition parameters (e.g., time to echo [TE], repetition time [TR]) as moderators to explore sources of heterogeneity. For all estimates, 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are provided. Results: Sixteen eligible manuscripts comprising 1819 patients were included in the quantitative analyses. IDH mutant (IDHm) gliomas had lower rCBV values compared to their wild-type (IDHwt) counterparts. The highest SMD was observed for rCBV_mean, rCBV_max, and rCBV 75^th percentile (SMD≈ − 0.8, 95% CI ≈ [− 1.2, − 0.5]). In meta-regression, shorter TEs, shorter TRs, and smaller slice thicknesses were linked to higher absolute SMDs. When discriminating IDHm from IDHwt, the highest pooled specificity was observed for rCBV_mean (82% [72, 89]), and the highest pooled sensitivity (i.e., 92% [86, 93]) and AUC (i.e., 0.91) for rCBV 10^th percentile. In the bivariate meta-regression, shorter TEs and smaller slice gaps were linked to higher pooled sensitivities. In IDHm, 1p19q codeletion was associated with higher rCBVmean (SMD = 0.9 [0.2, 1.5]) and rCBV 90^th percentile (SMD = 0.9 [0.1, 1.7]) values. Conclusions: Identification of vascular signatures predictive of IDH and 1p19q status is a novel promising application of DSC perfusion. Standardization of acquisition protocols and post-processing of DSC perfusion maps are warranted before widespread use in clinical practice.

Purpose: Surveillance of patients with high-grade glioma (HGG) and identification of disease progression remain a major challenge in neurooncology. This study aimed to develop a support vector machine (SVM) classifier, employing combined longitudinal structural and perfusion MRI studies, to classify between stable disease, pseudoprogression and progressive disease (3-class problem).Methods: Study participants were separated into two groups: group I (total cohort: 64 patients) with a single DSC time point and group II (19 patients) with longitudinal DSC time points (2-3). We retrospectively analysed 269 structural MRI and 92 dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion (DSC) MRI scans. The SVM classifier was trained using all available MRI studies for each group. Classification accuracy was assessed for different feature dataset and time point combinations and compared to radiologists’ classifications.Results: SVM classification based on combined perfusion and structural features outperformed radiologists’ classification across all groups. For the identification of progressive disease, use of combined features and longitudinal DSC time points improved classification performance (lowest error rate 1.6%). Optimal performance was observed in group II (multiple time points) with SVM sensitivity/specificity/accuracy of 100/91.67/94.7% (first time point analysis) and 85.71/100/94.7% (longitudinal analysis), compared to 60/78/68% and 70/90/84.2% for the respective radiologist classifications. In group I (single time point), the SVM classifier also outperformed radiologists’ classifications with sensitivity/specificity/accuracy of 86.49/75.00/81.53% (SVM) compared to 75.7/68.9/73.84% (radiologists).Conclusion: Our results indicate that utilisation of a machine learning (SVM) classifier based on analysis of longitudinal perfusion time points and combined structural and perfusion features significantly enhances classification outcome (pvalue= 0.0001).