It is yet not known whether the variation in knee orthotics pressure would lead to changes in muscle activity during-sit-to-stand postural transition in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). Participants in this analytical study were patients with knee OA. The research design was a cross-sectional study. They were enrolled in the study through a sample of convenience method. The primary outcome measure was surface electromyography for measuring muscle activity while changing knee orthotics pressure during sit-to-stand motion. Data were summarized with mean and standard deviation while Friedman’s test was performed for multiple comparison of variables, at a significance level of p = 0.05. Seven elderly patients with knee osteoarthritis (mean age 71.4 ± 11.8 years) participated in the study. Moderate orthotics (7.3 mmHg) led to a significant increase in the percentage maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) of tibialis anterior compared to that obtained without orthotics. Rectus femoris, vastus medialis, vastus lateralis, and biceps femoris tended to increase the % MVC with an increase in wearing pressure. It was therefore concluded that the muscle activity during sit-to-stand motion could be increased in patients with knee osteoarthritis by wearing flexible orthotics with varying pressure.
1 January 2021 in Journal of Physical Therapy Science
[Purpose] To investigate the effects of a flexible brace, by analyzing whether its usage; the difference in wearing pressure could change the joint position sensation in healthy participants; and develop a flexible knee brace for patients with knee osteoarthritis. [Participants and Methods] The study included eight healthy males with 14 knee joints (mean age, 22.0 ± 3.1 years). To measure joint position sense, an “angle reproduction test” was performed in three experimental conditions: 1) participants not wearing the brace, 2) the brace was secured with an appropriate force, and 3) the brace was fully secured using hook-and-loop fasteners. [Results] No significant difference was observed among groups comprising of those not wearing, those wearing with the standard force, and those wearing with the tight force. When the maximum hook-and-loop fastener was squeezed, the sensory error in joint position was maximized at both 30° and 60° flexion. [Conclusion] Joint position sense improvement was confirmed to be poor by orthosis, and an error occurred in the joint position sense by increasing the wearing pressure in orthosis. In future, measurements should be performed on patients with knee osteoarthritis who have decreased joint position sense and verify the effect of different wearing pressures verified.
[Purpose] We compared a knee orthosis developed with a focus on fitting pressure with the orthoses of patients with knee osteoarthritis, to examine whether the fitting pressure increased or not, and to compare the patients’ subjective evaluations of the two orthoses. [Participants and Methods] The subjects were 20 patients (8 males and 12 females) with knee osteoarthritis. First, we measured the pressure when the newly developed orthosis was worn and compared it with the pressure when the existing orthosis was worn. Then the patients reported their subjective evaluations of the difficulty of wearing, breathability, appearance, weight and wearing feeling of their existing orthosis and the newly developed orthosis on a Visual Analogue Scale. [Results] There was a significant difference in the pressure applied between the existing and newly developed orthoses. There were no significant differences in the patients’ subjective evaluations. [Conclusion] The pressure applied for the newly developed orthosis could be set higher than that of patients’ existing orthoses, but there were no differences in the patients’ subjective evaluations.