Ankit Sinha

Dr. Ankit Sinha

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
15 March 2023 in The Surgeon
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ASAnkit Sinha
Ankit Sinha
AWAlexander West
Alexander West
NVNikhil Vasdev
Nikhil Vasdev
PSPrasanna Sooriakumaran
Prasanna Sooriakumaran
ARAbhay Rane
Abhay Rane
MMMichael McKirdy
Michael McKirdy

13 October 2022 in The Surgeon
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AMAnja Mattson
Anja Mattson
ASAnkit Sinha
Ankit Sinha
INIke Njere
Ike Njere
NBNitinkumar Borkar
Nitinkumar Borkar
CSC.K. Sinha
C.K. Sinha

23 February 2022 in Current Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ASAnkit Sinha
Ankit Sinha
AWAlexander West
Alexander West
JHJohn Hayes
John Hayes
Jeremy Yuen Chun TeohJeremy Yuen Chun Teoh
Jeremy Yuen Chun Teoh
KDKarel Decaestecker
Karel Decaestecker
NVNikhil Vasdev
Nikhil Vasdev
Introduction: Detection of lymph node status in bladder cancer significantly impacts clinical decisions regarding its management. There is a wide range of detection modalities for this task, including lymphoscintigraphy, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, single-photon emission computed tomography, positron emission tomography, and fluoroscopy. We aimed to study the pre- and intraoperative detection modalities of sentinel lymph nodes in urinary bladder cancer. Method: This narrative review was performed by searching the PubMed and EMBASE libraries using the following search terms: (“Transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder” OR “urothelial cancer” OR “urinary bladder cancer” OR “bladder cancer”) AND ((“sentinel lymph node”) OR (“lymphatic mapping”) OR (“lymphoscintigraphy”) OR (“lymphangiography”) OR (“lymph node metastases”)). Studies analysing the effectiveness and outcomes of sentinel lymph node detection in bladder cancer were included, while non-English language, duplicates, and non-article studies were excluded. After analysing the libraries and a further manual search of bibliographies, 31 studies were included in this paper. We followed the RAMESES publication standard for narrative reviews to produce this paper. Results: Of the 31 studies included, 7 studies included multiple detection methods; 5 studies included lymphoscintigraphy; 5 studies included computed tomography and/or single-photon emission computed tomography; 5 studies included fluoroscopy; 4 studies included magnetic resonance imaging; and 5 studies included positron emission tomography. Discussion: Anatomical, radioactive, and functional detection modalities have been studied independently and in combination. The consensus is that preoperative detection with imaging helps guide surgical management and intraoperative detection methods help capture any lymph nodes that may have been missed. Each of these types of detection represent their own set of benefits and drawbacks, but there is currently limited evidence to support any change in overall practice to replace conventional staging.


1 February 2025 in The Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ASAnkit Sinha
Ankit Sinha
AMA Mattson
A Mattson
INI Njere
I Njere
CSCk Sinha
Ck Sinha
Introduction: Paediatric laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is performed by both paediatric and adult surgeons. The aim of this review was to compare outcomes at paediatric centres (PCs) and adult centres (ACs). Methods: A literature search was conducted, in accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, for papers published between January 2000 and December 2020. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata® version 16 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, US). Results: A total of 92 studies involving 74,852 paediatric LCs met the inclusion criteria. Over half (59%) of the LCs were performed at ACs. No significant differences were noted in the male-to-female ratio, mean age or mean body mass index between PCs and ACs. The main indications were cholelithiasis (34.1% vs 34.4% respectively, p=0.83) and biliary dyskinesia (17.0% vs 23.5% respectively, p<0.01). There was no significant difference in the median inpatient stay (2.52 vs 2.44 days respectively, p=0.89). Bile duct injury was a major complication (0.80% vs 0.37% respectively, p<0.01). Reoperation rates (2.37% vs 0.74% respectively, p<0.01) and conversion to open surgery (1.97% vs 4.74% respectively, p<0.01) were also significantly different. Meta-analysis showed no significant difference in overall complications (p=0.92). Conclusions: The number of LCs performed, intraoperative cholangiography use and conversion rates were higher at ACs whereas bile duct injury and reoperation rates were higher at PCs. Despite a higher incidence of bile duct injury at PCs, the incidence at both PCs and ACs was <1%. In complex cases, a joint operation by both paediatric and adult surgeons might be a better approach to further improve outcomes. Overall, LC was found to be a safe operation with comparable outcomes at PCs and ACs.

6 April 2021 in Eye
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ASAnkit Sinha
Ankit Sinha
VNVictoria Nowak
Victoria Nowak
FBFion Bremner
Fion Bremner