Po-Chien Wu

Dr. Po-Chien Wu

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
IHI-Hsin Huang
I-Hsin Huang
PWPo-Chien Wu
Po-Chien Wu
ELEn-Yuan Lin
En-Yuan Lin
CCChien-yu Chen
Chien-yu Chen
YKYi-No Kang
Yi-No Kang
We aimed to evaluate the response rate of migraines by using anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (anti-CGRP) for patients with migraines. We searched three main medical databases up to 29 March 2019. No restriction on language and publication time were applied. Eligible trials included randomized clinical trials investigating a 50%, 75%, and 100% response rate of migraine patients after anti-CGRP intervention. The collected data were dichotomous, and risk ratios (RRs) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to present the quantitative synthesis results. The systematic review identified 16 eligible randomized clinical trials (RCTs) with 9439 patients. Eight of the 16 trials with 2516 patients reported a 50% response rate, and the pooled results showed a significant benefit from anti-CGRP. However, the effects seem to gradually reduce from the first month (RR 1.99, 95% CI 1.59 to 2.49) to the third month (RR 1.48, 95% CI 1.26 to 1.75) of treatment. The magnitude of effect was influenced by the type of anti-CGRP, according to the test for differences between subgroups (I-square = 53%). The funnel plots and Egger’s tests did not show serious small study effects in the results. In conclusion, the current evidences confirmed that anti-CGRP treatment can reduce migraine pain in the short term (within three months), but the long-term effect should be investigated in the future. Moreover, its effects may be influenced by the type and dose of anti-CGRP. Therefore, future studies should make direct comparisons among anti-CGRP medications.

17 March 2022 in Dermatology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PWPo-Chien Wu
Po-Chien Wu
SMSheng-Hsiang Ma
Sheng-Hsiang Ma
YHYa-Yun Huang
Ya-Yun Huang
JCJin-Yu Chang
Jin-Yu Chang
YCYun-Ting Chang
Yun-Ting Chang
YDYing-Xiu Dai
Ying-Xiu Dai
Background: Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin disease with potential systemic involvement. Some evidence suggests an increased risk of dry eye in patients with psoriasis. However, the relationship between these two conditions remains unclear. The aim of our study is to investigate the association between psoriasis and dry eye disease. Methods: This meta-analysis was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020199445) and adhered to MOOSE checklist and PRISMA guidance for all processes. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were searched for studies examining the association between psoriasis and dry eye disease from inception to December 13, 2020. The primary outcome was the prevalence of dry eye disease in patients with psoriasis relative to controls. The secondary outcomes were the Schirmer I test score, tear film breakup time (TBUT), and ocular surface disease index (OSDI). The risk of bias of the selected studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Results: The meta-analysis showed a significant association between dry eye disease and psoriasis (OR, 8.49; 95% CI, 3.34–21.58). Moreover, patients with psoriasis had a significantly lower Schirmer I test score (MD, −2.80; 95% CI, −4.07 to −1.52), shorter TBUT (MD, −4.12; 95% CI, −5.22 to −3.02), and higher OSDI (MD, 20.15; 95% CI, 6.24–34.05; p < 0.01), compared to controls. Conclusions: The current evidence supports an association between dry eye disease and psoriasis. These results suggest ophthalmologic assessment for the early recognition and management of dry eye in patients with psoriasis.

1 January 2021 in The Spine Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MWMeng-Huang Wu
Meng-Huang Wu
PWPo-Chien Wu
Po-Chien Wu
CLChing-Yu Lee
Ching-Yu Lee
YLYen-Kuang Lin
Yen-Kuang Lin
THTsung-Jen Huang
Tsung-Jen Huang
YHYi-Hung Huang
Yi-Hung Huang

14 July 2022 in Archives of Dermatological Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PWPo-Chien Wu
Po-Chien Wu
CWChun-Ying Wu
Chun-Ying Wu
YLYing-Syuan Lyu
Ying-Syuan Lyu
YCYun-Ting Chang
Yun-Ting Chang
CWChen-Yi Wu
Chen-Yi Wu

5 December 2020 in Sexual Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PWPo-Chien Wu
Po-Chien Wu
CHChun-Shan Hung
Chun-Shan Hung
YKYi-No Kang
Yi-No Kang
CWChien Chih Wu
Chien Chih Wu
Introduction Clomipramine is effective in treating premature ejaculation, a common form of male sexual dysfunction that affects individual's mental health and quality of life, but its optimal dosage remains controversial. Aim In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and optimal dose of clomipramine for treating premature ejaculation among men. Methods Eligible studies of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were identified from the date of inception to June 21, 2020. We conducted the study according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Data of the study characteristics, intravaginal latency ejaculatory time (IELT), adverse events, success rate, and satisfaction rate of clomipramine vs placebo were extracted and analyzed. The risk ratio and mean difference were used for quantitatively analyzing binary outcomes and continuous outcomes. The standardized mean difference was applied to the outcome of satisfaction rate. The Mantel–Haenszel method was used for meta-analysis under random-effects model. To assess dose effect of clomipramine, a meta-regression analysis was performed. Main Outcome Measures The primary outcomes were the IELT and adverse events, and the secondary outcomes were the success rate and satisfaction rate of clomipramine treatment relative to the placebo. Results A total 14 randomized controlled trials with 710 patients were included for quantitative analysis. Clomipramine significantly increased the IELT compared with the placebo (mean difference: 1.47, 95% CI: 0.73–2.21). However, clomipramine was associated with higher risks of overall adverse events and adverse events in the nervous and respiratory systems. Significant dosage effects on the IELT (estimate: 0.0637, 95% CI: 0.0074–0.12) and a slightly increasing slope on adverse events were revealed. Conclusion Clomipramine increased the IELT and yielded greater satisfaction than the placebo, and the higher dose results in a superior IELT without leading to higher risk of adverse events under a dosage of 50-mg clomipramine. Wu P-C, Hung C-S, Kang Y-N, et al. Tolerability and Optimal Therapeutic Dosage of Clomipramine for Premature Ejaculation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sex Med 2021;9:100283.

1 June 2021 in Annals of Medicine & Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JWJeng-Cheng Wu
Jeng-Cheng Wu
PWPo-Chien Wu
Po-Chien Wu
YKYi-No Kang
Yi-No Kang
TTTing-En Tai
Ting-En Tai
To investigate the outcomes of laparoendoscopic single-site adrenalectomy (LESS-A) compared to multi-port laparoendoscopic adrenalectomy (m-LA). Studies comparing LESS-A with m-LA were identified from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library before June 2020. Post-operative pain, resumption outcomes, and perioperative outcomes were analyzed. We conducted meta-analyses using the Mantel-Haenszel method with random-effects model. Subset analyses were conducted according to peritoneal and retroperitoneal approaches. A small study effect was illustrated using funnel plots and Egger's test. One randomized controlled trial (RCT) and nineteen retrospective cohort studies involving 1554 patients were included for analyzed. Pooled analysis showed that LESS-A had significantly lower postoperative pain scores (MD −0.77, 95%CI −1.45 to −0.10) and less pain medication used (RR 0.74, 95%CI 0.60 to 0.91) compared to m-LA. Besides, LESS-A had significantly shorter hospital stays (MD −0.75, 95%CI −1.18 to −0.33), shorter duration of oral intake resumption (MD −0.33, 95%CI −0.60 to −0.06), and better cosmetic satisfaction (SMD 1.15, 95%CI 0.21 to −2.09). As for perioperative outcomes, LESS-A led to significant longer operative time (MD 13.43, 95%CI 4.08 to 22.77). No significant differences were observed in terms of the remaining perioperative outcomes. LESS-A is associated with less post-operative pain and quicker recovery duration. However, the longer operative time of LESS-A compared with m-LA is a drawback.