Rumiana Bojilova

Dr. Rumiana Bojilova

National Institute of Geophysics, Geodesy and Geography, Sofia, Sofia-Grad, Bulgaria
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
30 October 2024 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RBRumiana Bojilova
Rumiana Bojilova
PMPlamen Mukhtarov
Plamen Mukhtarov
DPDora Pancheva
Dora Pancheva
The main idea of the present study is to investigate in detail the time evolution of the spatial inhomogeneities connected with the ionospheric response to the geomagnetic storm registered in the period of 10–11 May 2024. The obtained ionospheric anomalies represented by the relative deviations of the global Total Electron Content (TEC) data have been utilized in the analysis. The used global TEC data have been converted to a coordinate system with a modip latitude and geographical longitude. In addition to the maps illustrating the global spatial distribution of the geomagnetically forced ionospheric anomalies, a presentation of the observed longitudinal structures by sinusoidal approximation has also been used. The resulting positive and negative responses have been studied depending on the magnetic latitude, local times and the behavior of the geomagnetic activity parameters during the considered event. The interpretation takes into account the known mechanisms for the effect of the geomagnetic storm on the electron density. A special attention is focused on the differences in the two hemispheres at high and mid latitudes, where a simultaneous direct impact of the particle precipitation and the change in the temperature regime of the neutral atmosphere has been assumed. The low-latitude response as a result of the Equatorial Ionization Anomaly (EIA) associated with Disturbed Dynamo Electric Fields (DDEFs) and its relationship with local time has also been considered.

16 March 2024 in Advances In Space Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DPDora Pancheva
Dora Pancheva
PMPlamen Mukhtarov
Plamen Mukhtarov
RBRumiana Bojilova
Rumiana Bojilova

23 March 2023 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RBRumiana Bojilova
Rumiana Bojilova
PMPlamen Mukhtarov
Plamen Mukhtarov
The present work examines the spatial and temporal distribution of positive and negative TEC anomalies on the global and regional scale. To study the local response of the ionosphere, foF2 data from ground ionosonde stations and TEC data from Madrigal and CODE databases have been used. The relative deviation, which also determines the type of TEC response during geomagnetic storms on 3 and 4 February 2022, is considered. In the present study, the regions of positive and negative TEC anomalies and their evolution during storms are examined in detail. As a result of the study, estimates of the following were obtained: (i) the location of the sectors of the polar regions, in where the particle precipitation from the solar wind is observed, (ii) the mid-latitude regions, in which the mechanism of influence of the O/N2 ratio dominates, and (iii) the region around the equator, in which the influence of the electric field dominates. An attempt was made to determine which mechanism of influence of geomagnetic storms on the ionospheric electron density is dominant in different regions. The following main mechanisms are considered: (a) the additional ionization from the particles’ precipitation, (b) the change of the ratio of atomic oxygen (O) to molecular nitrogen (N2) due to the heating of the neutral air, and (c) the influence on the equatorial ionospheric anomaly.

12 April 2024 in Atmosphere
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DPDora Pancheva
Dora Pancheva
PMPlamen Mukhtarov
Plamen Mukhtarov
RBRumiana Bojilova
Rumiana Bojilova
This paper presents climatological features of the longitudinal structures WN4, WN3, and WN2 and their drivers observed in the lower thermospheric temperatures and in the ionospheric TEC. For this purpose, two long-term data sets are utilized: the satellite SABER/TIMED temperature measurements, and the global TEC maps generated with the NASA JPL for the interval of 2002–2022. As the main drivers of the longitudinal structures are mainly nonmigrating tides, this study first investigates the climatology of those nonmigrating tides, which are the main contributors of the considered longitudinal structures; these are nonmigrating diurnal DE3, DE2, and DW2, and semidiurnal SW4 and SE2 tides. The climatology of WN4, WN3, and WN2 structures in the lower thermosphere reveals that WN4 is the strongest one with a magnitude of ~20 K observed at 10° S in August, followed by WN2 with ~13.9 K at 10° S in February, and the weakest is WN3 with ~12.4 K observed over the equator in July. In the ionosphere, WN3 is the strongest structure with a magnitude of 5.9 TECU located at −30° modip latitude in October, followed by WN2 with 5.4 TECU at 30 modip in March, and the last is WN4 with 3.7 TECU at −30 modip in August. Both the climatology of the WSA and the features of its drivers are investigated as well.

28 July 2023 in Universe
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RBRumiana Bojilova
Rumiana Bojilova
PMPlamen Mukhtarov
Plamen Mukhtarov
A study of the behavior of the main characteristics of the ionosphere over Europe during the 26–28 February 2023 ionospheric storm was carried out in this present work. The additional influence of sudden stratospheric warming on the ionosphere was considered. The behavior of the critical frequency of the ionosphere foF2 (characterizing the maximum electron density), the peak height of the F2-layer (hmF2), and Total Electron Content (TEC) were investigated through their relative deviations from the quiet conditions. The behavior of the TEC over Europe showed the geographic latitudinal dependence of the response. The variability in the ionospheric critical frequency was represented by the data of 10 ionospheric stations for vertical sounding located in two groups: (i) near the prime meridian and (ii) near the 25° E meridian. Some differences were found in the response compared to the TEC response, which was explained by the different responses of the top maximum region and bottom maximum region. The peak height of the F2 layer varied strongly during the storm, which was due to the forced drift of ionospheric plasma induced by additional electric fields. The present detailed analysis of the ionospheric response shows that the considered storm exhibited characteristic features inherent in the winter season but with some manifestations of reactions in equinox conditions.

2 July 2019 in Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RBRumiana Bojilova
Rumiana Bojilova
PMPlamen Mukhtarov
Plamen Mukhtarov