Marcus Saile

Mr. Marcus Saile

University of Hohenheim
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
5 July 2022 in Agronomy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AAAlicia Allmendinger
Alicia Allmendinger
MSMichael Spaeth
Michael Spaeth
MSMarcus Saile
Marcus Saile
Gerassimos PeteinatosGerassimos Peteinatos
Gerassimos Peteinatos
RGRoland Gerhards
Roland Gerhards
Site-specific weed control offers a great potential for herbicide savings in agricultural crops without causing yield losses and additional weed management costs in the following years. Therefore, precision weed management is an efficient tool to meet the EU targets for pesticide reduction. This review summarizes different commercial technologies and prototypes for precision patch spraying and spot spraying. All the presented technologies have in common that they consist of three essential parts. (1) Sensors and classifiers for weed/crop detection, (2) Decision algorithms to decide whether weed control is needed and to determine a suitable type and rate of herbicide. Usually, decision algorithms are installed on a controller and (3) a precise sprayer with boom section control or single nozzle control. One point that differs between some of the techniques is the way the decision algorithms classify. They are based on different approaches. Green vegetation can be differentiated from soil and crop residues based on spectral information in the visible and near-infrared wavebands (“Green on Brown”). Those sensors can be applied for real-time on/off control of single nozzles to control weeds before sowing after conservation tillage and in the inter-row area of crops. More sophisticated imaging algorithms are used to classify weeds in crops (“Green on Green”). This paper will focus on Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) for plant species identification. Alternatively, the position of each crop can be recorded during sowing/planting and afterward herbicides can be targeted to single weeds or larger patches of weeds if the economic weed threshold is exceeded. With a standardized protocol of data communication between sensor, controller and sprayer, the user can combine different sensors with different sprayers. In this review, an ISOBUS communication protocol is presented for a spot sprayer. Precision chemical weed control can be realized with tractor-mounted sprayers and autonomous robots. Commercial systems for both classes will be introduced and their economic and environmental benefits and limitations will be highlighted. Farmers ask for robust systems with less need for maintenance and flexible application in different crops.

27 August 2021 in Agronomy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BZBeate Zimmermann
Beate Zimmermann
ICIngrid Claß-Mahler
Ingrid Claß-Mahler
Moritz Von CosselMoritz Von Cossel
Moritz Von Cossel
Iris LewandowskiIris Lewandowski
Iris Lewandowski
JWJan Weik
Jan Weik
EBEnno Bahrs
Enno Bahrs
The search for approaches to a holistic sustainable agriculture requires the development of new cropping systems that provide additional ecosystem services beyond biomass supply for food, feed, material, and energy use. The reduction of chemical synthetic plant protection products is a key instrument to protect vulnerable natural resources such as groundwater and biodiversity. Together with an optimal use of mineral fertilizer, agroecological practices, and precision agriculture technologies, a complete elimination of chemical synthetic plant protection in mineral-ecological cropping systems (MECSs) may not only improve the environmental performance of agroecosystems, but also ensure their yield performance. Therefore, the development of MECSs aims to improve the overall ecosystem services of agricultural landscapes by (i) improving the provision of regulating ecosystem services compared to conventional cropping systems and (ii) improving the supply of provisioning ecosystem services compared to organic cropping systems. In the present review, all relevant research levels and aspects of this new farming concept are outlined and discussed based on a comprehensive literature review and the ongoing research project “Agriculture 4.0 without Chemical-Synthetic Plant Protection”.

15 September 2018 in Agriculture
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ASAlexandra Schappert
Alexandra Schappert
MMMiriam Messelhäuser
Miriam Messelhäuser
MSMarcus Saile
Marcus Saile
Gerassimos PeteinatosGerassimos Peteinatos
Gerassimos Peteinatos
RGRoland Gerhards
Roland Gerhards
The utilization of an effective stubble management practice can reduce weed infestation before and in the following main crop. Different strategies can be used, incorporating mechanical, biological, and chemical measures. This study aims at estimating the effects of cover crop (CC) mixtures, various stubble tillage methods, and glyphosate treatments on black-grass, volunteer wheat and total weed infestation. Two experimental trials were conducted in Southwestern Germany including seven weed management treatments: flat soil tillage, deep soil tillage, ploughing, single glyphosate application, dual glyphosate application, and a CC mixture sown in a mulch-till and no-till system. An untreated control treatment without any processing was also included. Weed species were identified and counted once per month from October until December. The CC mixtures achieved a black-grass control efficacy of up to 100%, whereas stubble tillage and the single glyphosate treatment did not reduce the black-grass population, on the contrary it induced an increase of black-grass plants. The dual glyphosate application showed, similar to the CC treatments, best results for total weed and volunteer wheat reduction. The results demonstrated, that well developed CCs have a great ability for weed control and highlight that soil conservation systems do not have to rely on chemical weed control practices.

5 August 2024 in Plants
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AAAlicia Allmendinger
Alicia Allmendinger
MSMichael Spaeth
Michael Spaeth
MSMarcus Saile
Marcus Saile
Gerassimos PeteinatosGerassimos Peteinatos
Gerassimos Peteinatos
RGRoland Gerhards
Roland Gerhards
Spot spraying can significantly reduce herbicide use while maintaining equal weed control efficacy as a broadcast application of herbicides. Several online spot-spraying systems have been developed, with sensors mounted on the sprayer or by recording the RTK-GNSS position of each crop seed. In this study, spot spraying was realized offline based on georeferenced unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) images with high spatial resolution. Studies were conducted in four maize fields in Southwestern Germany in 2023. A randomized complete block design was used with seven treatments containing broadcast and spot applications of pre-emergence and post-emergence herbicides. Post-emergence herbicides were applied at 2–4-leaf and at 6–8-leaf stages of maize. Weed and crop density, weed control efficacy (WCE), crop losses, accuracy of weed classification in UAV images, herbicide savings and maize yield were measured and analyzed. On average, 94% of all weed plants were correctly identified in the UAV images with the automatic classifier. Spot-spraying achieved up to 86% WCE, which was equal to the broadcast herbicide treatment. Early spot spraying saved 47% of herbicides compared to the broadcast herbicide application. Maize yields in the spot-spraying plots were equal to the broadcast herbicide application plots. This study demonstrates that spot-spraying based on UAV weed maps is feasible and provides a significant reduction in herbicide use.

18 June 2022 in Agronomy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MSMarcus Saile
Marcus Saile
MSMichael Spaeth
Michael Spaeth
RGRoland Gerhards
Roland Gerhards
Due to the increasing number of herbicide-resistant weed populations and the resulting yield losses, weed control must be given high priority to ensure food security. Integrated weed management (IWM) strategies, including reduced herbicide application, sensor-guided mechanical weed control and combinations thereof are indispensable to achieve this goal. Therefore, this study examined combinations of pre- and post-emergence herbicide applications with sensor-based harrowing and hoeing in cereals by conducting five field experiments at two locations in Southwestern Germany from 2019 to 2021. Each experiment contained an untreated control and a single post-emergence herbicide treatment as a comparison to these IWM treatments. The effects of the different IWM approaches on weed control efficacy (WCE), crop density, and grain yield were recorded. All experiments were set up in a randomized complete block design with four repetitions. Pre-emergence herbicide application combined with one-time harrowing and subsequent hoeing (Pre-Herb + Harr + Hoe) achieved the highest WCE (100%), followed by an approach of WCE (95%) for two-times hoeing. In contrast, a single pre-emergence herbicide application achieved the worst result with an average WCE of 25%. Grain yield was equal between all treatments in between 6 t ha−1 and 10 t ha−1, except for a single pre-emergence herbicide application, which achieved a 2.5 t ha−1 higher grain yield in winter wheat in 2021 that averaged 11 t ha−1, compared to the combination of Pre-Herb + Harr + Hoe that averaged 8.5 t ha−1. The results showed that it is possible to reduce and replace herbicides while achieving equivalent yield and WCE.

8 December 2020 in Agronomy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MSMichael Spaeth
Michael Spaeth
JMJannis Machleb
Jannis Machleb
Gerassimos PeteinatosGerassimos Peteinatos
Gerassimos Peteinatos
MSMarcus Saile
Marcus Saile
RGRoland Gerhards
Roland Gerhards
Harrowing is mostly applied with a constant intensity across the whole field. Heterogeneous field conditions such as variable soil texture, different crop growth stages, variations of the weed infestation level, and weed species composition are usually not considered during the treatment. This study offers a new approach to sensor-based harrowing which addresses these field variations. Smart harrowing requires the continuous adaptation of the treatment intensity to maintain the same level of crop selectivity while ensuring a high weed control efficacy. Therefore, a harrow was equipped with a sensor-system to automatically adjust the angle of the harrow tines based on a newly developed decision algorithm. In 2020, three field experiments were conducted in winter wheat and spring oats to investigate the response of the weed control efficacy and the crop to different harrowing intensities, in Southwest Germany. In all experiments, six levels of crop soil cover (CSC) were tested. The CSC determines the balance between crop damage and weed removal. Each experiment contained an untreated control and an herbicide treatment as a comparison to the harrowing treatments. The results showed an increase in the weed control efficacy (WCE) with an increasing CSC threshold. Difficult-to-control weed species such as Cirsium arvense L. and Galium aparine L. were best controlled with a CSC threshold of 70%. However, 70% CSC caused up to 50% crop biomass loss and up to 2 t·ha−1 of grain yield reduction. With a CSC threshold of 20% it was possible to control up to 98% of Thlaspi arvense L. The highest crop biomass, grain yield, and selectivity were achieved with an CSC threshold of 20–25% at all locations. With this harrowing intensity, grain yields were higher than in the herbicide plots and a WCE of 68–98% was achieved. Due to the rapid adjustment of tine angle, the new sensor-based harrow allows users to apply the most selective harrowing intensity in every location of the field. Therefore, it can achieve equal weed control efficacies as using herbicide applications.