Katharine Tibbetts

Prof. Katharine Tibbetts

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
12 December 2012 in Physical Review A
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KTKatharine Tibbetts
Katharine Tibbetts
CBConstantin Brif
Constantin Brif
MGMatthew D. Grace
Matthew D. Grace
ADAshley Donovan
Ashley Donovan
DHDavid L. Hocker
David L. Hocker
HRHerschel Rabitz
Herschel Rabitz
Generating a unitary transformation in the shortest possible time is of practical importance to quantum information processing because it helps to reduce decoherence effects and improve robustness to additive control field noise. Many analytical and numerical studies have identified the minimum time necessary to implement a variety of quantum gates on coupled-spin qubit systems. This work focuses on exploring the Pareto front that quantifies the tradeoff between the competitive objectives of maximizing the gate fidelity F and minimizing the control time T. In order to identify the critical time T* below which the target transformation is not reachable, as well as to determine the associated Pareto front, we introduce a numerical method of Pareto front tracking (PFT). We consider closed two- and multiqubit systems with constant interqubit coupling strengths and each individual qubit controlled by a separate time-dependent external field. Our analysis demonstrates that unit fidelity (to a desired numerical accuracy) can be achieved at any T≥T* in most cases. However, the optimization search effort rises superexponentially as T decreases and approaches T*. Furthermore, a small decrease in control time incurs a significant penalty in fidelity for T<T*, indicating that it is generally undesirable to operate below the critical time. We investigate the dependence of the critical time T* on the coupling strength between qubits and the target gate transformation. Practical consequences of these findings for laboratory implementation of quantum gates are discussed.

29 August 2017 in The Journal of Physical Chemistry A
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
VMVictoria K Meader
Victoria K Meader
MJMallory G. John
Mallory G. John
CRCollin J. Rodrigues
Collin J. Rodrigues
KTKatharine Tibbetts
Katharine Tibbetts

8 April 2015 in Nano Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BTBehzad Tangeysh
Behzad Tangeysh
KTKatharine Tibbetts
Katharine Tibbetts
JOJohanan H. Odhner
Johanan H. Odhner
BWBradford B. Wayland
Bradford B. Wayland
RLRobert J. Levis
Robert J. Levis

2 November 2018 in Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CRCollin J. Rodrigues
Collin J. Rodrigues
JBJulian A. Bobb
Julian A. Bobb
MJMallory G. John
Mallory G. John
SFSergey P. Fisenko
Sergey P. Fisenko
MEM. Samy El-Shall
M. Samy El-Shall
KTKatharine Tibbetts
Katharine Tibbetts
Irradiation of aqueous [AuCl4]− with 532 nm, 8 ns pulses produces uniform 5 nm Au nanoparticles through surface plasmon-mediated photothermal autocatalytic growth, in contrast to the large polydisperse particles formed with 800 nm, 30 fs pulses.

29 July 2019 in The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LBLaysa M. Frias Batista
Laysa M. Frias Batista
VMVictoria K Meader
Victoria K Meader
KRKatherine Romero
Katherine Romero
KKKarli Kunzler
Karli Kunzler
FKFariha Kabir
Fariha Kabir
KTKatharine Tibbetts
Katharine Tibbetts

14 August 2013 in The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BTBehzad Tangeysh
Behzad Tangeysh
KTKatharine Tibbetts
Katharine Tibbetts
JOJohanan H. Odhner
Johanan H. Odhner
BWBradford B. Wayland
Bradford B. Wayland
RLRobert J. Levis
Robert J. Levis