Jennifer Schneider

Dr. Jennifer Schneider

University of Newcastle (Australia)
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

44Years (1983-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
12 July 2018 in British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CLCatherine J. Lucas
Catherine J. Lucas
PGPeter Galettis
Peter Galettis
Jennifer SchneiderJennifer Schneider
Jennifer Schneider
There is increasing interest in the use of cannabinoids for disease and symptom management, but limited information available regarding their pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics to guide prescribers. Cannabis medicines contain a wide variety of chemical compounds, including the cannabinoids delta‐9‐tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), which is psychoactive, and the nonpsychoactive cannabidiol (CBD). Cannabis use is associated with both pathological and behavioural toxicity and, accordingly, is contraindicated in the context of significant psychiatric, cardiovascular, renal or hepatic illness. The pharmacokinetics of cannabinoids and the effects observed depend on the formulation and route of administration, which should be tailored to individual patient requirements. As both THC and CBD are hepatically metabolized, the potential exists for pharmacokinetic drug interactions via inhibition or induction of enzymes or transporters. An important example is the CBD‐mediated inhibition of clobazam metabolism. Pharmacodynamic interactions may occur if cannabis is administered with other central nervous system depressant drugs, and cardiac toxicity may occur via additive hypertension and tachycardia with sympathomimetic agents. More vulnerable populations, such as older patients, may benefit from the potential symptomatic and palliative benefits of cannabinoids but are at increased risk of adverse effects. The limited availability of applicable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic information highlights the need to initiate prescribing cannabis medicines using a ʻstart low and go slowʼ approach, carefully observing the patient for desired and adverse effects. Further clinical studies in the actual patient populations for whom prescribing may be considered are needed, to derive a better understanding of these drugs and enhance safe and optimal prescribing.

1 July 2015 in Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SHSusan Hua
Susan Hua
EMEllen Marks
Ellen Marks
Jennifer SchneiderJennifer Schneider
Jennifer Schneider
SKSimon Keely
Simon Keely
Colon targeted drug delivery is an active area of research for local diseases affecting the colon, as it improves the efficacy of therapeutics and enables localized treatment, which reduces systemic toxicity. Targeted delivery of therapeutics to the colon is particularly advantageous for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), which includes ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. Advances in oral drug delivery design have significantly improved the bioavailability of drugs to the colon; however in order for a drug to have therapeutic efficacy during disease, considerations must be made for the altered physiology of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract that is associated with GI inflammation. Nanotechnology has been used in oral dosage formulation design as strategies to further enhance uptake into diseased tissue within the colon. This review will describe some of the physiological challenges faced by orally administered delivery systems in IBD, the important developments in orally administered nano-delivery systems for colon targeting, and the future advances of this research. Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) poses a significant problem for a large number of patients worldwide. Current medical therapy mostly aims at suppressing the active inflammatory episodes. In this review article, the authors described and discussed the various approaches current nano-delivery systems can offer in overcoming the limitations of conventional drug formulations.

28 June 2018 in British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LDLaura M. Dryburgh
Laura M. Dryburgh
NBNanthi Bolan
Nanthi Bolan
CGChristopher Grof
Christopher Grof
PGPeter Galettis
Peter Galettis
Jennifer SchneiderJennifer Schneider
Jennifer Schneider
JMJennifer Helen Martin
Jennifer Helen Martin

1 January 2013 in Frontiers in Pharmacology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
KIKaterina S. Iwaszkiewicz
Katerina S. Iwaszkiewicz
Jennifer SchneiderJennifer Schneider
Jennifer Schneider
SHSusan Hua
Susan Hua
Mechanisms of endogenous pain control are significant. Increasing studies have clearly produced evidence for the clinical usefulness of opioids in peripheral analgesia. The immune system uses mechanisms of cell migration not only to fight pathogens but also to control pain and inflammation within injured tissue. It has been demonstrated that peripheral inflammatory pain can be effectively controlled by an interaction of immune cell-derived opioid peptides with opioid receptors on peripheral sensory nerve terminals. Experimental and clinical studies have clearly shown that activation of peripheral opioid receptors with exogenous opioid agonists and endogenous opioid peptides are able to produce significant analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects, without central opioid mediated side effects (e.g., respiratory depression, sedation, tolerance, dependence). This article will focus on the role of opioids in peripheral inflammatory conditions and the clinical implications of targeting peripheral opioid receptors.

26 October 2015 in British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KOKate O'hara
Kate O'hara
IWIan M. R. Wright
Ian M. R. Wright
Jennifer SchneiderJennifer Schneider
Jennifer Schneider
AJAlison L. Jones
Alison L. Jones
JMJennifer Helen Martin
Jennifer Helen Martin