Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a public health problem worldwide. We aimed to estimate the CKD prevalence in Spain and to examine the impact of the accumulation of cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF). We performed a nationwide, population-based survey evaluating 11,505 individuals representative of the Spanish adult population. Information was collected through standardised questionnaires, physical examination, and analysis of blood and urine samples in a central laboratory. CKD was graded according to current KDIGO definitions. The relationship between CKD and 10CVRF was assessed (age, hypertension, general obesity, abdominal obesity, smoking, high LDL-cholesterol, low HDL-cholesterol, hypertriglyceridaemia, diabetes and sedentary lifestyle). Prevalence of CKD was 15.1% (95%CI: 14.3-16.0%). CKD was more common in men (23.1% vs 7.3% in women), increased with age (4.8% in 18-44 age group, 17.4% in 45-64 age group, and 37.3% in ≥65), and was more common in those with than those without cardiovascular disease (39.8% vs 14.6%); all P<.001. CKD affected 4.5% of subjects with 0-1CVRF, and then progressively increased from 10.4% to 52.3% in subjects with 2 to 8-10CVRF (P trend <.001). CKD affects one in seven adults in Spain. The prevalence is higher than previously reported and similar to that in the United States. CKD was particularly prevalent in men, older people and people with cardiovascular disease. Prevalence of CKD increased considerably with the accumulation of CVRF, suggesting that CKD could be considered as a cardiovascular condition.

Hypertension is the most important risk factor for global disease burden. Detection and management of hypertension are considered as key issues for individual and public health, as adequate control of blood pressure levels markedly reduces morbidity and mortality associated with hypertension. Aims of these practice guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension of the Spanish Society of Hypertension include offering simplified schemes for diagnosis and treatment for daily practice, and strategies for public health promotion. The Spanish Society of Hypertension assumes the 2018 European guidelines for management of arterial hypertension developed by the European Society of Cardiology and the European Society of Hypertension, although relevant aspects of the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines and the 2020 International Society of Hypertension guidelines are also commented. Hypertension is defined as a persistent elevation in office systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mmHg, and assessment of out-of-office blood pressure and global cardiovascular risk are considered of key importance for evaluation and management of hypertensive patients. The target for treated blood pressure should be < 130/80 for most patients. The treatment of hypertension involves lifestyle interventions and drug therapy. Most people with hypertension need more than one antihypertensive drug for adequate control, so initial therapy with two drugs, and single pill combinations are recommended for a wide majority of hypertensive patients.

Many patients are hypertensive at the medical settings but show normal blood pressure out of the doctor's office, and are classified as white‐coat hypertensives. On the other hand, many patients with controlled hypertension at the clinic show ambulatory blood pressure levels above the thresholds considered for an adequate blood pressure control, known as having masked hypertension. Using data from the Spanish Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring Registry (Spanish ABPM Registry), a national program developed to promote the use of the ambulatory technique for hypertension management in daily practice, we have reviewed the main strengths of this approach, that is the ability to detect discrepancies of blood pressure status with respect to office blood pressure measurement, and to better assess accurate rates of hypertension control. White‐coat hypertension within patients with elevated office blood pressure, and masked hypertension within office‐controlled patients affected one of three patients in each office status. On the other hand, rates of ambulatory blood pressure control (50%) doubled those of office blood pressure control (25%), still remaining half the patients uncontrolled. We think that a systematic use of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, and strategies to improve blood pressure control constitute key priorities in hypertension management.

Conventional blood pressure (BP) measurement in clinical practice is the most used procedure for the diagnosis and treatment of hypertension (HT), but is subject to considerable inaccuracies due to, on the one hand, the inherent variability of the BP itself and, on the other hand biases arising from the measurement technique and conditions, Some studies have demonstrated the prognosis superiority in the development of cardiovascular disease using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). It can also detect "white coat" hypertension, avoiding over-diagnosis and over-treatment in many cases, as well detecting of masked hypertension, avoiding under-detection and under-treatment. ABPM is recognised in the diagnosis and management of HT in most of international guidelines on hypertension. The present document, taking the recommendations of the European Society of Hypertension as a reference, aims to review the more recent evidence on ABPM, and to serve as guidelines for health professionals in their clinical practice and to encourage ABPM use in the diagnosis and follow-up of hypertensive subjects. Requirements, procedure, and clinical indications for using ABPM are provided. An analysis is also made of the main contributions of ABPM in the diagnosis of "white coat" and masked HT phenotypes, short term BP variability patterns, its use in high risk and resistant hypertension, as well as its the role in special population groups like children, pregnancy and elderly. Finally, some aspects about the current situation of the Spanish ABPM Registry and future perspectives in research and potential ABPM generalisation in clinical practice are also discussed.

BACKGROUND: Resistant hypertension is characterized by elevated blood pressure (BP) despite using 3 antihypertensive agents. Ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) detects the presence of white-coat resistant hypertension (24-hour BP <130/80 mm Hg). The aim of the study was to evaluate risks of death in resistant hypertension compared with controlled hypertension, as well as in ABPM-confirmed (24-hour BP ≥130 or 80 mm Hg), versus white-coat resistant hypertension. METHODS: We selected 8146 patients with controlled hypertension (office BP <140/90 mm Hg while being treated with ≤3 antihypertensive drugs) and 8577 with resistant hypertension (BP ≥140 or ≥90 mm Hg while being treated with ≥3 drugs). All-cause and cardiovascular mortalities (median follow-up, 9.7 years) were compared between groups, as well as between patients with white-coat (3289) and ABPM-confirmed (5288) resistant hypertension. Hazard ratios (HRs) from Cox models after adjustment for clinical confounders were used for comparisons. RESULTS: Compared with controlled hypertension, resistant hypertension was associated with an increased risk in all-cause (HR, 1.21 [95% CI, 1.12–1.30]) and cardiovascular mortalities (HR, 1.33 [95% CI, 1.17–1.51]) in confounder-adjusted models. Compared with white-coat, ABPM-confirmed resistant hypertension was associated with an increased risk of all-cause (HR, 1.45 [95% CI, 1.32–1.60]) and cardiovascular (HR, 1.68 [95% CI, 1.43–1.98]) mortalities. When ABPM-confirmed and white-coat resistant hypertension were separately compared with controlled hypertension, only the former was associated with an increased risk of death and cardiovascular death (HR, 1.36 [95% CI, 1.26–1.48] and 1.56 [95% CI, 1.36–1.79]), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: ABPM-confirmed resistant hypertension is associated with an increased risk of death and cardiovascular death with respect to both controlled hypertension and white-coat resistant hypertension.