Stefano Toppo

Prof. Stefano Toppo

University of Padova
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

31Years (1996-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
29 August 2010 in Nature Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Riccardo VelascoRiccardo Velasco
Riccardo Velasco
AZAndrey Zharkikh
Andrey Zharkikh
JAJason Affourtit
Jason Affourtit
ADAmit Dhingra
Amit Dhingra
ACAlessandro Cestaro
Alessandro Cestaro
RVRoberto Viola
Roberto Viola

27 January 2013 in Nature Methods
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PRPredrag Radivojac
Predrag Radivojac
WCWyatt T Clark
Wyatt T Clark
TOTal Ronnen Oron
Tal Ronnen Oron
ASAlexandra M Schnoes
Alexandra M Schnoes
TWTobias Wittkop
Tobias Wittkop
IFIddo Friedberg
Iddo Friedberg
A report on the results of the first large-scale community-based critical assessment of protein function annotation (CAFA) experiment. Automated annotation of protein function is challenging. As the number of sequenced genomes rapidly grows, the overwhelming majority of protein products can only be annotated computationally. If computational predictions are to be relied upon, it is crucial that the accuracy of these methods be high. Here we report the results from the first large-scale community-based critical assessment of protein function annotation (CAFA) experiment. Fifty-four methods representing the state of the art for protein function prediction were evaluated on a target set of 866 proteins from 11 organisms. Two findings stand out: (i) today's best protein function prediction algorithms substantially outperform widely used first-generation methods, with large gains on all types of targets; and (ii) although the top methods perform well enough to guide experiments, there is considerable need for improvement of currently available tools.

19 December 2007 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Riccardo VelascoRiccardo Velasco
Riccardo Velasco
AZAndrey Zharkikh
Andrey Zharkikh
MTMichela Troggio
Michela Troggio
DCDustin A. Cartwright
Dustin A. Cartwright
ACAlessandro Cestaro
Alessandro Cestaro
RVRoberto Viola
Roberto Viola
Worldwide, grapes and their derived products have a large market. The cultivated grape species Vitis vinifera has potential to become a model for fruit trees genetics. Like many plant species, it is highly heterozygous, which is an additional challenge to modern whole genome shotgun sequencing. In this paper a high quality draft genome sequence of a cultivated clone of V. vinifera Pinot Noir is presented. We estimate the genome size of V. vinifera to be 504.6 Mb. Genomic sequences corresponding to 477.1 Mb were assembled in 2,093 metacontigs and 435.1 Mb were anchored to the 19 linkage groups (LGs). The number of predicted genes is 29,585, of which 96.1% were assigned to LGs. This assembly of the grape genome provides candidate genes implicated in traits relevant to grapevine cultivation, such as those influencing wine quality, via secondary metabolites, and those connected with the extreme susceptibility of grape to pathogens. Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) distribution was consistent with a diffuse haplotype structure across the genome. Of around 2,000,000 SNPs, 1,751,176 were mapped to chromosomes and one or more of them were identified in 86.7% of anchored genes. The relative age of grape duplicated genes was estimated and this made possible to reveal a relatively recent Vitis-specific large scale duplication event concerning at least 10 chromosomes (duplication not reported before). Sanger shotgun sequencing and highly efficient sequencing by synthesis (SBS), together with dedicated assembly programs, resolved a complex heterozygous genome. A consensus sequence of the genome and a set of mapped marker loci were generated. Homologous chromosomes of Pinot Noir differ by 11.2% of their DNA (hemizygous DNA plus chromosomal gaps). SNP markers are offered as a tool with the potential of introducing a new era in the molecular breeding of grape.

30 June 2020 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Enrico LavezzoEnrico Lavezzo
Enrico Lavezzo
EFElisa Franchin
Elisa Franchin
CCConstanze Ciavarella
Constanze Ciavarella
GCGina Cuomo-Dannenburg
Gina Cuomo-Dannenburg
Luisa BarzonLuisa Barzon
Luisa Barzon
Andrea CrisantiAndrea Crisanti
Andrea Crisanti

7 September 2016 in Genome Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YJYuxiang Jiang
Yuxiang Jiang
TOTal Ronnen Oron
Tal Ronnen Oron
WCWyatt T. Clark
Wyatt T. Clark
ABAsma R. Bankapur
Asma R. Bankapur
DDDaniel D’aNdrea
Daniel D’aNdrea
PRPredrag Radivojac
Predrag Radivojac
A major bottleneck in our understanding of the molecular underpinnings of life is the assignment of function to proteins. While molecular experiments provide the most reliable annotation of proteins, their relatively low throughput and restricted purview have led to an increasing role for computational function prediction. However, assessing methods for protein function prediction and tracking progress in the field remain challenging. We conducted the second critical assessment of functional annotation (CAFA), a timed challenge to assess computational methods that automatically assign protein function. We evaluated 126 methods from 56 research groups for their ability to predict biological functions using Gene Ontology and gene-disease associations using Human Phenotype Ontology on a set of 3681 proteins from 18 species. CAFA2 featured expanded analysis compared with CAFA1, with regards to data set size, variety, and assessment metrics. To review progress in the field, the analysis compared the best methods from CAFA1 to those of CAFA2. The top-performing methods in CAFA2 outperformed those from CAFA1. This increased accuracy can be attributed to a combination of the growing number of experimental annotations and improved methods for function prediction. The assessment also revealed that the definition of top-performing algorithms is ontology specific, that different performance metrics can be used to probe the nature of accurate predictions, and the relative diversity of predictions in the biological process and human phenotype ontologies. While there was methodological improvement between CAFA1 and CAFA2, the interpretation of results and usefulness of individual methods remain context-dependent.

1 November 2009 in Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
STStefano Toppo
Stefano Toppo
LFLeopold Flohé
Leopold Flohé
FUFulvio Ursini
Fulvio Ursini
Stefano VaninStefano Vanin
Stefano Vanin
MMMatilde Maiorino
Matilde Maiorino