Teresa Margarida Cunha

Dr. Teresa Margarida Cunha

Instituto Portugues de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

32Years (1995-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
5 December 2016 in European Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MBM. Bazot
M. Bazot
NBN. Bharwani
N. Bharwani
CHC. Huchon
C. Huchon
KKK. Kinkel
K. Kinkel
Teresa Margarida CunhaTeresa Margarida Cunha
Teresa Margarida Cunha
ARAnd Andrea G. Rockall
And Andrea G. Rockall
Endometriosis is a common gynaecological condition of unknown aetiology that primarily affects women of reproductive age. The accepted first-line imaging modality is pelvic ultrasound. However, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly performed as an additional investigation in complex cases and for surgical planning. There is currently no international consensus regarding patient preparation, MRI protocols or reporting criteria. Our aim was to develop clinical guidelines for MRI evaluation of pelvic endometriosis based on literature evidence and consensus expert opinion. This work was performed by a group of radiologists from the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR), experts in gynaecological imaging and a gynaecologist expert in methodology. The group discussed indications for MRI, technical requirements, patient preparation, MRI protocols and criteria for the diagnosis of pelvic endometriosis on MRI. The expert panel proposed a final recommendation for each criterion using Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine (OCEBM) 2011 levels of evidence. Key Points • This report provides guidelines for MRI in endometriosis. • Minimal and optimal MRI acquisition protocols are provided. • Recommendations are proposed for patient preparation, best MRI sequences and reporting criteria.

3 January 2020 in JAMA Network Open
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ITIsabelle Thomassin-Nagarra
Isabelle Thomassin-Nagarra
EPEdouard Poncelet
Edouard Poncelet
AJAurelie Jalaguier-Coudray
Aurelie Jalaguier-Coudray
AGAdalgisa Guerra
Adalgisa Guerra
LFLaure S. Fournier
Laure S. Fournier
ARAnd Andrea G. Rockall
And Andrea G. Rockall
Adnexal masses are common, resulting in a significant clinical workload related to diagnostic imaging, surgery, and pathology.1,2 Most adnexal masses are benign, and most masses can be accurately categorized as benign or malignant on ultrasonography.3,4 However, between 18% and 31% of adnexal masses remain indeterminate following ultrasonography using International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) Simple Rules or other ultrasonography scoring systems.3,4 Moreover, this prevalence may be an underestimation, given that many studies only report the cases with available surgical reference standards.4 There are very limited data on patients who undergo only imaging and clinical follow-up. In a prospective external validation of the IOTA Simple Rules5 among 666 women, 362 women (54.4%) underwent surgery, 309 of whom (85.4%) had benign masses. The authors reported that, among 304 patients (45.6%) who underwent expectant management, 71 patients (23.4%) experienced disappearance of the mass, and 233 (76.6%) had a persistent mass on imaging follow-up that was considered benign after 1 year of follow-up.

10 November 2010 in European Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CBCorinne Balleyguier
Corinne Balleyguier
ESE. Sala
E. Sala
Teresa Margarida CunhaTeresa Margarida Cunha
Teresa Margarida Cunha
ABA. Bergman
A. Bergman
Boris BrkljacicBoris Brkljacic
Boris Brkljacic
KKK. Kinkel
K. Kinkel

11 July 2018 in European Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
NSNourgaret Stephanie
Nourgaret Stephanie
MHMariana Horta
Mariana Horta
ESEvis Sala
Evis Sala
YLYulia Lakhman
Yulia Lakhman
ITIsabelle Thomassin-Naggara
Isabelle Thomassin-Naggara
RFRosemarie Forstner
Rosemarie Forstner

21 October 2016 in European Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RFRosemarie Forstner
Rosemarie Forstner
ITIsabelle Thomassin-Naggara
Isabelle Thomassin-Naggara
Teresa Margarida CunhaTeresa Margarida Cunha
Teresa Margarida Cunha
KKKaren Kinkel
Karen Kinkel
Gabriele MasselliGabriele Masselli
Gabriele Masselli
ARAnd Andrea G. Rockall
And Andrea G. Rockall
An update of the 2010 published ESUR recommendations of MRI of the sonographically indeterminate adnexal mass integrating functional techniques is provided. An algorithmic approach using sagittal T2 and a set of transaxial T1 and T2WI allows categorization of adnexal masses in one of the following three types according to its predominant signal characteristics. T1 'bright' masses due to fat or blood content can be simply and effectively determined using a combination of T1W, T2W and FST1W imaging. When there is concern for a solid component within such a mass, it requires additional assessment as for a complex cystic or cystic-solid mass. For low T2 solid adnexal masses, DWI is now recommended. Such masses with low DWI signal on high b value image (e.g. > b 1000 s/mm2) can be regarded as benign. Any other solid adnexal mass, displaying intermediate or high DWI signal, requires further assessment by contrast-enhanced (CE)T1W imaging, ideally with DCE MR, where a type 3 curve is highly predictive of malignancy. For complex cystic or cystic-solid masses, both DWI and CET1W—preferably DCE MRI—is recommended. Characteristic enhancement curves of solid components can discriminate between lesions that are highly likely malignant and highly likely benign. Key Points • MRI is a useful complementary imaging technique for assessing sonographically indeterminate masses. • Categorization allows confident diagnosis in the majority of adnexal masses. • Type 3 contrast enhancement curve is a strong indicator of malignancy. • In sonographically indeterminate masses, complementary MRI assists in triaging patient management.

6 January 2015 in Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PSPedro Santos
Pedro Santos
Teresa Margarida CunhaTeresa Margarida Cunha
Teresa Margarida Cunha
Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology